Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 7, 2016

Boehner, Cantor Back Syria Strike

Speaker John A. Boehner and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor have backed President Barack Obama’s plan to strike Syria, giving the president a major lift as the White House conducts an all-out push to get lawmakers on board ahead of votes expected next week.

Boehner emerged from a White House briefing on Syria with Obama this morning prepared to, in his words, “support the president’s call to action.”

“And I believe my colleagues should support the president’s call to action,” the Ohio Republican added. He joined Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who had already backed a strike against Syria.

“The use of these [chemical] weapons has to be responded to and only the United States has the capability and capacity to stop Assad and warn others around the world that this type of behavior will not be tolerated,” Boehner said.

Cantor also released a statement Tuesday morning that said he intends to “vote to provide the President of the United States the option to use military force in Syria.”

“While the authorizing language will likely change, the underlying reality will not,” the Virginia Republican said, also noting that “there are differing opinions on both sides of the aisle” and “it is up to President Obama to make the case to Congress and to the American people that this is the right course of action, and I hope he is successful in that endeavor.”

While some in Congress have criticized Obama’s drawing of a “red line” with Syria on chemical weapons, Cantor stood by it.

“A failure to act when acting is in America’s interests and when a red line has been so clearly crossed will only weaken our ability to use diplomacy, economic pressure, and other non-lethal tools to remove Assad and deter Iran and other aggressors,” he said.

Pelosi reiterated her support for military action and said she would seek to persuade other lawmakers to do the same to take on Bashar al-Assad.

“People say, ‘Well, he killed 100,000 people. What’s the difference with this 1,400?’ With this 1,400, he crossed a line with using chemical weapons. President Obama did not draw the red line. Humanity drew it decades ago, 170-some countries supporting the convention on not using chemicals — chemical warfare.”

She said that the United States needed “to send a very clear message to those who have weapons of mass destruction of any variety that — that they should forget about using them.”

“Members have to decide are they willing — do they want to ignore the fact that this humanitarian disaster took place or not? And then there’s the larger issue of Syria’s behavior if they get away with it.”

Exactly what lawmakers will be voting on, however, isn’t yet clear. Obama told reporters as he sat down with lawmakers this morning that he was willing to negotiate on the test of the authorization to use force, up to a point.

And the whipping operation still won’t be a slam dunk, as noted by Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck.

“Everyone understands that it is an uphill battle to pass a resolution, and the speaker expects the White House to provide answers to members’ questions and take the lead on any whipping effort,” Buck said. “All votes authorizing the use of military force are conscience votes for members, and passage will require direct, continuous engagement from the White House.”

  • phillyfanatic

    The Speaker makes a fine pt. on the economy and then with Cantor shows why the Pub wussies are stupid. He supports our Putin on the Potomac in his Manhood strike against Assad while both Pubs like McCain and the Speaker and Obama simply refuse to know that the REBELS are just more Islamists like Al Q , Hamas, Hez. The Pubs should just vote against the war act. So what that Obama blames Pubs; while no Dem comes out except that silly old rag, Pelosi, to support this Naif in the WH.

  • Lowell

    It has NOT even been debated yet! What do they have on these RINOs???????????

  • Cameiros

    Surprise, surprise…a right winger voting for war.
    Will wonders never cease.
    I futilely look forward to the day when a conservative advocates for peace.

  • Grizzld

    I wrote my congressman to vote NO. Obama created the problem, let him solve it by himself. The UN bailed, the Brits bailed, Germany bailed, NATO bailed, the Arab League also bailed, so what happened to all the blather by democrats about getting allies. Bush was criticized for having willing allies but now democrats are content to have NO allies? This is not leadership, it is amateur hour by a laurel and hardy team of nitwits like Clinton and Kerry! lobbing missiles into empty buildings is utterly meaningless because Syria has already moved their stuff out of the targeted areas. Is Obama prepared to fight a regional war if Syria retaliates as I am sure they would? If Obama could be trusted I would feel different but he is a hypocrite of the worst sort and now Pelosi has joined as madam hypocrite in the House. Remember all this in 2014, and Vote for NO democrats.

  • OldmanRick

    Idiots all. Here we go into another non war with thousands of troops and material still trapped in that landlocked manure pile called Afghanistan. Yep, the country with Iran to the east and our good, old ally – Pakistan – to the west. And the only way out is fly or drive if the other bordering countries give a transit permit.

    BTW, how did Libya work out for the local folks and Benghazi for our guys?

    Yep, the crybaby eunuch, will cave and support the bombing of Syria along with the rest of his rino trolls. What a bunch of self serving, groveling idiots. What is sad is that this crowd of buffoons doesn’t have to do the fighting, bleeding, and dying. What is even more particularly galling is that this entire fiasco is going down so the brat can save political face for his origin asinine statement.

  • HongryHawg

    Hey, Boehner! Where’s your proof that Assad was responsible? Oh, I see. You’re taking Kerry’s word for it. You pathetic traitor. obama likes old white men. Are you his current squeeze?

  • John Allegro

    If we are free to respond to the fleeting circumstances we are constantly faced with, it will be impossible for another person to judge the merits of our choices and efforts correctly.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...