Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 7, 2016

Boehner: Sequester Will Stay Until Obama Offers Smarter Cuts


(Douglas Graham/CQ Roll Call)

Speaker John A. Boehner came before the mics on Thursday, and he made one thing clear: The sequester is here to stay until the White House gets serious about spending cuts.

“Sequestration is going to remain in effect until the president agrees to cuts and reforms that will allow us to remove it,” the Ohio Republican said to reporters in his weekly news conference. “The president insisted on the sequester none of us wanted, none of us like it, there are smarter ways to cut spending. The House has moved twice over the last year and a half to replace the sequester, and we saw no action in the United States Senate.

Boehner’s remarks came a day after GOP leadership made the startling decision to pull from the floor, mid-consideration, an appropriations bill funding transportation and housing programs. Boehner on Thursday morning reiterated the official party line, that the choice was because of scheduling concerns, not concerns that there weren’t enough Republican votes to bring the measure over the finish line.

But that talking point has run in conflict with speculation from fellow Republicans, including those on the Appropriations Committee, who say there was not adequate GOP support — from conservatives who said the bill didn’t cut deeply enough and from more moderate Republicans who couldn’t stomach cuts to key programs on which constituents in their districts rely, from Amtrak to Community Development Block Grants.

Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., released on Wednesday an uncharacteristically scathing statement, saying that the measure lacked the sufficient numbers of votes — which, above all else, reflected that the House had made a clear choice: “sequestration — and its unrealistic and ill-conceived discretionary cuts — must be brought to an end.”

“I met with the chairman yesterday and his committee,” Boehner said. “Look, the appropriators, they’ve had a tough job over the last couple of years. And they have taken a lot of tough votes in their committee. So I understand the frustration.”

Boehner wouldn’t comment more specifically about the substance of the conversation, or whether he expressed any displeasure with Rogers and other appropriators who cited a whip issue at the heart of the decision to pull the bill.

Those who voiced this assessment on Wednesday evening include Transportation-HUD Subcommittee Chairman Tom Latham, R-Iowa, and subcommittee members Tom Cole, R-Okla., and Charlie Dent, R-Pa.

  • shok2sys

    Herein lies the problem of federal deficit spending. Both sides use FEDERAL spending to bolster their state re-election prospects regardless of whether the line item represents a NATIONAL priority. The fact is both sides have killed and are in the process of eating the federal cash cow. Idiocracy at it’s finest.

  • vikings55

    Boehner has to know that he is exceptionally terrible at this job. Why go through all this embarrassment and stress. Some people are just suckers for punishment.

    • hepette

      we are the suckers for having to spend 55 MILLION taxpayer money to repeal obamacare 38 times!!!insanity=doing the same thing over and over while expecting different results.

      • Saler

        Actually it is 40 times now.

        • hepette

          yes you are correct………

  • wygit

    He sounds like a guy beating his wife while saying “Stop making me do this!”

  • wildrover4

    Obama is not going to propose the entitlement reform that Republicans want. Boeher will lose the defense hawks before the next round of sequestration kicks in.

  • DrSquishy

    Republicans can kiss it. There won’t be any cuts to entitlements until there is more revenue.


    • hepette

      ALL dems must vote in every election…including local elections

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...