Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
November 26, 2014

Boehner Works Behind the Scenes on ‘Grand Bargain’

boehner 126 091813 445x321 Boehner Works Behind the Scenes on Grand Bargain

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

House Republicans continued with the piecemeal government funding approach Thursday, even as chatter turned to whether Speaker John A. Boehner could finally pull off a “grand bargain” on government spending and the debt limit.

On Wednesday, the Ohio Republican met with groups of GOP lawmakers who want to pass a clean CR to reopen the government. Boehner and the lawmakers discussed the possibility of a “grand bargain” — a new one that would raise the debt ceiling, fund the government, address the sequester and extract concessions on Obamacare.

But later Wednesday night, the speaker met with President Barack Obama, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell at the White House. And the negotiations — or lack thereof — seemed to have left a sour taste in the mouth of Republicans.

“The president reiterated one more time he will not negotiate,” Boehner said just after the White House meeting.

While it’s clear leaders were unable to immediately find a solution to reopen the government, the meeting, which lasted more than an hour, covered the CR and the debt limit, which expires Oct. 17. National Review’s Robert Costa also reported that Boehner brought up the idea of a “grand bargain” at the White House Wednesday evening.

Costa quoted a Democratic source as saying:

“Boehner raised the prospect of a grand bargain-type deal at the White House meeting and was laughed at because everyone feels like they’ve heard this song and dance before. The general feeling is, if he’s really ready to make some tough choices — read, revenue — then great. But the history of this from where we sit is Boehner talking a big game, then bailing as soon as he runs into the inevitable resistance from a certain faction in his caucus.”

Previous attempts by Boehner to craft a broad budget deal with the president have been swatted down by conservative elements of the House GOP.

This time could be different — if Boehner is willing to buck the tea party wing of the House GOP conference. On Thursday, The New York Times reported that Boehner has assured some GOP lawmakers he will not allow the U.S. to default on its debt — a scenario that would likely have catastrophic consequences for U.S. economy and the world.

As The New York Times reported, one Republican lawmaker said Boehner has said he would allow a debt ceiling increase to pass with a majority of Democratic votes:

“The lawmaker, who spoke on the condition of not being named, said Mr. Boehner indicated he would be willing to violate the so-called Hastert rule if necessary to pass a debt limit increase. The informal rule refers to a policy of not bringing to the floor any measure that does not have a majority of Republican votes.”

GOP aides cautioned that Boehner has long said he would not allow a debt default, and that he also will still demand concessions from the White House to pass an increase in the debt limit.

But still the partisan rhetoric and warfare continued.

On the Senate floor Thursday, Reid said that Boehner privately told him weeks ago he wanted a clean CR at the current funding levels — just the legislation Democrats are insisting on now.

Also on Thursday, Cantor criticized the president for his “my way or the highway” stance.

“We should sit down and have a discussion,” the Virginia Republican told reporters at a morning news conference. “But because there is an insistence on no negotiations, no talking, my way or the highway, we are here.”

While walking down a hallway, Cantor said he found it “unbelievable” that Obama “would call Speaker Boehner and others over to the White House just to let them know that he wouldn’t negotiate.”

Despite apparent behind the scenes maneuvering, the House voted 265-160 on a GOP bill that would pay military reserve personnel during the shutdown. It’s the fourth mini-continuing-resolution the House has passed, in addition to a bill that was signed by Obama to pay active duty military personnel.

While Democrats assented to military pay bill, they appear resolute in not allowing Republicans to fund only the popular pieces of the government in an effort to mitigate the effects of a shutdown — in reality and politically.

The ranking Democrat of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, summed up why Democrats agreed to paying the military during a shutdown, but not funding other important pieces of government.

“The troops are getting shot at,” Smith said. “They’re actually at war.”

Connor O’Brien contributed to this report.

  • GraceD

    You cannot trust Boehner. Look how he walked away from the Grand Bargin before? Was it 2011?

  • Jeffrey Lebowski

    It’s looking more and more likely that this ends for Speaker Boehner the way it did for the Black Knight in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.” After King Arthur’s superior swordplay reduces the Black Knight to a mere stump of a man, the Black Knight says, “All right, we’ll call it a draw.”

  • Mike N

    The time for negotiation is past. They had 4 years to negotiate over Obamacare. If we give any ground this time, they will do this every time. No more.

  • pitch1934

    Forget negotiating “grand” bargains, orange man. Get the budget on the table. You know that enough representatives have come to their senses. do it. Get the clean budget passed.

  • tpartynitwit

    You want a bargain? Go to a friggin’ yard sale you Teatards!

  • John

    I completely understand the need to forswear negotiating on the CR and the debt limit–to do so would institutionalize government by crisis and negotiation through hostage-taking.

    However, I see one way to ‘negotiate on the debt ceiling’ without actually negotiating its dollars and cents, the real danger.

    How ’bout trading a permanent ‘McConnell Clause’ for some of the more realistic reforms the Republicans desire so much (and which, admittedly, could improve the country’s long term financial problems, if achieved in a fair and balanced manner) ? This particular hostage is forever rescued; the opposition party (whichever it happens to be in the future) forever retains its ability to voice debt-limit dissent; and the current crisis evaporates, with both sides able to claim ‘victory’ (though in reality it’s the American economy and American people who will have won).

    • thereasonableprogressive

      I’m not sure I totally understand your plan, but it seems to me the debt ceiling should be raised without any strings attached. Preventing the government from meeting it’s basic obligations is sort of a political weapon of mass destruction that should be banned outright.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...