Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 30, 2014

Democrats Request CBO Analysis of Ryan Budget’s Impact on Poverty

hoyer093013 445x296 Democrats Request CBO Analysis of Ryan Budgets Impact on Poverty

(CQ Roll Call File Photo)

The latest Ryan budget is no more likely than its predecessors to become law. But as with those those earlier documents, this year’s spending blueprint is giving both parties plenty of election-year ammunition.

Democrats, looking for some policy heft to leverage their political talking points, have asked the Congressional Budget Office to analyze the impact on poverty of Budget Chairman Paul D. Ryan’s fiscal 2015 budget.

“Our budgets serve as an important tool for expressing Congress’s level of support for domestic anti-poverty initiatives and prioritizing investments in opportunity,” Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., and Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., wrote in a Monday letter to CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf. “Such an analysis will aid Members of Congress in making an informed decision on whether Chairman Ryan’s budget will improve or worsen the state of poverty in America.”trans Democrats Request CBO Analysis of Ryan Budgets Impact on Poverty

Citing cuts to “public education, home heating and rental assistance, nutrition assistance, health and other critical investments,” Hoyer and Lee, the chairwoman of the Democratic Whip Task Force on Poverty, Income Inequality and Opportunity suggested that the CBO report “include a projection of individual and family incomes that would decrease below the poverty threshold and increase above the poverty threshold as a result of policy changes proposed in Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution.”

The Wisconsin Republican’s budget is due to come to the House floor this week, where it’s expected to pass — albeit with some defections from within the GOP rank and file. As is tradition, the House is also due to hold symbolic votes on a series of alternative budgets sponsored by various factions within the chamber, including the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the conservative Republican Study Committee.

Read Hoyer and Lee’s full letter to CBO below:

Dear Director Elmendorf:

We write to you to request that the Congressional Budget Office prepare an analysis of the impact on poverty in our country under the budget resolution reported out of the House Budget Committee on April 2, 2014 by Chairman Paul Ryan. Our budgets serve as an important tool for expressing Congress’s level of support for domestic anti-poverty initiatives and prioritizing investments in opportunity. Such an analysis will aid Members of Congress in making an informed decision on whether Chairman Ryan’s budget will improve or worsen the state of poverty in America.

An analysis of how Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution would affect poverty in our nation would help Congress understand the full impact its severe domestic spending cuts would have on the most vulnerable Americans. Specifically, funding for nondefense discretionary accounts, a category of spending that includes public education, home heating and rental assistance, nutrition assistance, health, and other critical investments, would be dramatically reduced by Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution. The budget resolution would shift Medicare costs onto seniors, restrict funding for a Medicaid program that largely benefits lower income seniors, and repeal the Affordable Care Act’s supports currently allowing low and middle income Americans to get health insurance. These and other policies will undoubtedly impact millions of Americans living in or near poverty today. If possible, the report may include a projection of individual and family incomes that would decrease below the poverty threshold and increase above the poverty threshold as a result of policy changes proposed in Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution.

At the same time, reduced investments in policies that help middle class families stay afloat could lead to an increase in the number of people who may need to rely on countercyclical safety net programs. Congress would benefit from an accounting of these costs when considering Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution.

Understanding the constraints under which the CBO functions, should completing such an analysis be impractical, we would appreciate a better understanding of the scope of analysis the CBO can provide on poverty with regard to policy proposals of this magnitude.

With that said, we ask that you look carefully at what Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution would do for those Americans who face hunger and homelessness, especially children, our veterans, and the elderly. Such an analysis of the broader costs of adopting the policies in Chairman Ryan’s budget resolution would help Congress understand precisely what is at stake for the most vulnerable Americans.

Sincerely yours,

Steny H. Hoyer, Democratic Whip

Barbara Lee, Chair, Democratic Whip Task Force on Poverty, Income Inequality, and Opportunity

  • semby

    From the party who has increased poverty ten fold; I find this rich.

  • dangerclose

    House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) new budget plan takes from the poor and gives to the rich. Ryan’s new budget savages the poor and middle class by cutting five trillion dollars of spending from the federal budget over the next ten years to “claim” balance in fiscal year 2024.

    The Ryan budget repeals the Affordable Care Act (taking away coverage from millions of Americans who just attained it), ends traditional Medicare (coverts it into block grants and sends it to the states), ends most of Medicaid (Ryan’s budget cuts $732 billion from Medicaid on top of the cuts from repealing the Affordable Care Acts Medicaid expansion), terminates the Children’s Health Insurance Program, cuts food aid provided through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by at least $135 billion (coverts it into block grants and sends it to the states), and cuts Pell Grants for low-income college students by more than $125 billion. Ryan’s budget also cuts at least $500 billion from low income programs including the Earned Income Tax Credit, the low income component of the Child Tax Credit, the school lunch program and other child nutrition programs, and Supplemental Security Income (which aids the very poor whom are elderly or have serious disabilities).

    The spending cuts while cruel would bring the budget to balance if not for Ryan’s tax cut proposals. His new budget lowers the top individual income tax rate to 25 percent, eliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax, cuts the top corporate rate to 25 percent, and repeals health reform’s revenue provisions. According to Tax Policy Center analysis these tax cuts would likely cost about $5 trillion over ten years.

    Claiming a balanced budget is not the same as achieving one and Representative Ryan’s plan does not come close. Ryan’s new budget shows these tax cuts as having zero costs (using fraudulent dynamic scoring), does not explain how they would be offset, and still claims to balance the budget within ten years. Apparently dishonesty knows no bounds.

  • Fresh Mountain Air

    Here we find a brief overview of the Obama regime’s lies about the 2013 sequester: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/341553/obama-caught-lying-about-sequester-deroy-murdock

    • dangerclose

      THESE ARE THE FACTS! CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS SHUTDOWN THE GOVERNMENT, THREATENED THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES, THREATENED DEFAULT ON U.S. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS, CAUSED THE LOSE OF THE UNITED STATES AAA CREDIT RATING, AND FORCED DOLLAR PER DOLLAR SPENDING
      CUTS FOR NEW BORROWING. THESE FACTS ARE TRUTHFUL AND THEY PROVE THAT CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SEQUESTER!!!

  • Scoop Jaxson

    It is Harry Reid who is refused to compromise.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...