Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 30, 2015

‘Good Ideas’ Are Point of EPA Carbon Emissions Hearings, McCarthy Says

EPA Administrator Testifies At Senate Hearing On Carbon Pollution Standards

McCarthy. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

“We expect good feedback from these sessions,” EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told reporters Monday about this week’s listening sessions on the agency’s proposal to regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants. “No good ideas should be off the table.”

The four hearings, part of the EPA’s effort to collect public comment about the proposal, are in Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Denver and Pittsburgh.

The agency met with 60 business groups in first 25 business days since the rule was announced June 2 and has received 300,000 comments so far, McCarthy said. The agency also met with states and partnerships of states to discuss the proposal.

“Flexibility is the key to this” and there has been “overwhelming support for that type of approach,” McCarthy said without mentioning the nine states that have joined in a lawsuit against the rule.

That flexibility has also been an ongoing cause for confusion.

“States are looking to EPA to sit down with them individually and identify where their individual standards came from,” she said. Some think the states are limited to the types of theoretical actions the EPA used to calculate reduction levels. “That’s not the limitation, that’s how the standard was set,” she said. “States have the opportunity to use whatever strategy they can reasonably justify.”

CQ Roll Call’s Lauren Gardner has more on feedback on the rule (subscription).

Comments (14)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. colsooonscoorner

    July 28, 2014
    5:46 p.m.

    EPA is a political robot of obumma.

  2. Mona

    July 28, 2014
    7:07 p.m.

    The states should be telling the EPA to butt out.

  3. Quintis Arrius

    July 29, 2014
    11:14 a.m.

    Since I happen to be made of 18.5 % carbon, I really resent being singled out by the EPA, those greasy carbonphobes!
    But seriously:The POINT of power plants is to generate power, not to limit carbon emissions. Power plant emissions, if they really kill people through their “emissions” would soon have no customer base, so they are ultimately self-regulating.
    I would LOVE to see the EPA take their tiresome braying about carbon emission regulations to China. I would enjoy that reality show.

  4. ceithor

    July 29, 2014
    1:12 p.m.

    You are obviously too young to remember the acid rain problems back in the 70s. The EPA put stricter rules in place for emissions of nitric and sulfuric acid particles, most of which come from coal plants. Once the rules were in place, the problem has pretty much gone away. So glad you mentioned China because that is what we would look like without “tiresome braying about carbon emission regulations…” Personally, I like having the paint stay on my car.

  5. stopcronycapitalism

    July 30, 2014
    8:50 p.m.

    EPA is out of control. They do things like drive the last lead smelter out of this country which puts 125 people out of work and leaving the US dependent upon countries like China for lead that is produced with no environmental protections. Like the environment doesn’t include the entire world! What are they thinking? Instead of developing more environmentally positive means of using low cost, reliable coal to generate electricity they want to throw it out and force us to pay for high cost, unreliable wind energy. These people are hell bent to destroy our economy in the name of pollution control. Put a halter on them.

  6. gomer

    Aug. 4, 2014
    8:28 a.m.

    Corporations care about the air you breath.

  7. Mona

    Aug. 10, 2014
    1:40 a.m.

    I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not, but they breathe the same air we do.

  8. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    1:12 p.m.

    Enjoyed reading this, very good stuff, thanks.

  9. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    7:02 a.m.

    Very interesting points you have remarked, regards for posting.

  10. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    11:47 p.m.

    I’d have to examine with you here. Which is not one thing I usually do! I take pleasure in reading a post that may make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!

  11. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    4:35 a.m.

    Great – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related info ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, website theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Nice task.

  12. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    4:29 p.m.

    It’s best to take part in a contest for among the finest blogs on the web. I will recommend this site!

  13. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    4:28 p.m.

    Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and precise effort to make a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and in no way appear to get something done.

  14. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    4:30 a.m.

    You are my breathing in, I have few web logs and rarely run out from to post .

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...