Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 2, 2015

House Skirts LNG Filibuster

For a fleeting moment, a California lawmaker played with the idea of a filibuster Thursday, as he pushed for a requirement that exports of liquefied natural gas be shipped by U.S. flagged vessels. After the chairwoman told Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., that debate on a point of order was not timed and could continue as long as it was on the issue, you could see the wheels turning.

“Did the chairwoman say that the time is unlimited as long as I speak to the subject?” he asked, laughing. It was after 5 p.m. and the House was in its second day of debate on the Energy-Water spending bill. Garamendi had previously floated the proposal, Bloomberg reports, to prop up the nation’s shipping industry.

“If we fail to take steps along the way to secure the maritime industry, we will see it disappear,” Garamendi said before running out of time to speak about his amendment. Energy-Water Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, raised a point of order, giving Garamendi another chance to talk. After briefly pondering the filibuster, he acquiesced.

“I’ll yield back, we’ll come back at this in a proper way,” he said. subscribers can read more coverage of the spending bill here.

Comments (5)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Yankee Mike Bravo

    July 16, 2014
    3:55 a.m.

    Transporting LNG out of U.S. ports has serious implications for national security. Allowing foreign-flagged ships to handle that much explosive materials would be sheer madness. Go get ‘em, Garamendi!

  2. Gunnar René Øie

    July 22, 2014
    3:05 p.m.

    Making LNG exports more difficult and expensive would not improve national security. Quite to the contrary – it would just contribute to your allies’ dependence on gas from countries like Russia. Obviously US legal standards regarding safety and the environment should apply to both US and non-US flagged vessels which export LNG from the US.

    This would simply be an attempt to establish a monopoly to try to help the US economy, but the impact might actually be negative in the final analysis.

  3. geo

    July 23, 2014
    8:19 a.m.

    This topic strife and wars that took place in and around the world are
    caused by a simple misunderstanding is reflected in the definition of
    what God is Muslim and the other gods of other religions, the God of the
    Muslims is not like anything is Hearing and like me like I am the God
    of Jesus Christ, I am Father Son Holy Spirit My dad solution in my body
    and I need 12 for a messenger to follow the low this evrything

  4. Libertylover143

    July 24, 2014
    11:37 a.m.

    I worked as an Engineer on American flag LNG ships for 9 years in the Far East. It is a very dangerous cargo and easy to explode without the help of terrorists and with just a little help from a evil person you could easily flatten a city. KEEP ALL OUR LNG SHIPS AMERICAN FLAG.

  5. Gunnar René Øie

    July 25, 2014
    12:38 p.m.

    Signed, the AFL-CIO? Do you have any evidence that, say, Norwegian, Danish or Japanese operators are less safe than US ones?

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...