Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 10, 2016

Air Force Tries to Save Cash, Congress Won’t Let It

An A-10 Thunderbolt is parked on a tarmac in the Czech Republic where it was taking part in joint NATO military exercises in 2012.   AFP PHOTO/ RADEK MICA         (Radek Mica/AFP/GettyImages)

An A-10 Thunderbolt parked on a tarmac in the Czech Republic where it was taking part in joint NATO military exercises in 2012. AFP PHOTO/ RADEK MICA (Radek Mica/AFP/GettyImages)

Everywhere Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James turns to cut her budget, Congress puts up a roadblock. Trying to get rid of the A-10: “So far it’s not gone over tremendously well,” she said. A proposal to shutter bases via the Base Realignment and Closure process: “I would give that zero probability of passing this year.” The notion of slicing aircraft here and there: “That hasn’t gone over very well either.”

It leaves James with few options of her own choosing, she told defense reporters at a breakfast Wednesday, along with some alternatives she doesn’t want — and a future she views as unrealistic.

The main thing she can do is keep advancing her message, she said.

“Part of our duty is, we have to keep telling the story,” she said.

The story of the A-10, James said, is this: “We love the A-10. It’s been a terrific aircraft. Given the budget situation we face, given the age, given the survivability, given the other aircraft we have, we feel on balance it needs to be retired. It will save billions of dollars if we retire it.”

The Senate and House Armed Services panels, in their fiscal 2015 defense authorization bills, moved to block the retirement of the A-10, also known as the “Warthog,” a close-air support plane for ground forces used to attack tanks and other enemy ground targets. The House’s version of the annual defense spending bill, being considered on the floor Wednesday, did not block the Defense Department’s A-10 plans, but there could be an amendment that renews the fight to do so in that legislation.

“What we have said to the opponents of the proposal is, if we’re not allowed to retire the A-10, please, please, please you must give us the money to add back,” James said. “And by the way, when you find the money, don’t take it out of readiness. We really really need to get our readiness levels up.”

The Senate authorization bill would take the money out of operations and maintenance — which equals readiness, she said. The House authorization bill has said it should come  out of the war-related Overseas Contingency Account, but James wasn’t sure if that would hold up.

And the need for cuts is real thanks to budget caps put in place in 2011 and the related sequestration that cuts budgets across-the-board.

“Members on the defense committees are very pro-defense. There are people who still say we’re going to get rid of sequestration, it’s going to work out,” James said. “I want to be hopeful too. My job is, I’ve also got to be realistic broadly about this.”

(Side note: The Quadrennial Defense Review released this year by the department has been criticized as unrealistic for projecting spending that goes $115 billion — through fiscal 2016 to 2019 — beyond what the department could spend under current law.)

If Congress doesn’t retire the A-10, one alternative, James said, would be to “take a few aircraft here, a few aircraft there.” But, she said, “We have some of that as well in the fy15 budget. That hasn’t gone over very well either.”

While she doesn’t anticipate Congress embracing the BRAC process this year, she said the Pentagon is likely to continue making the argument.

“As a person who came out of business, the last things a corporation would do is spend money on facilities that are no longer no longer needed,” she said. “You would never, never, never run a business this way. I realize government is not a business. But there are certain principles make good common sense.”

Comments (43)

  1. pitch1934

    June 18, 2014
    7:41 p.m.

    What does the Air Force have that can replace the “Warthog”?

  2. J.R. Davis

    June 18, 2014
    11:49 p.m.

    If you want to win wars against armies with tanks, quickly, with minimal loss of blood and treasure, you need the A-10.

  3. Frank Oliveri

    June 19, 2014
    2:40 p.m.

    one of the big savings benefits lost when cutting a little here and a little there is that it leaves in place an entire logistical and support infrastructure that costs hundreds of millions to continue. If you go after an old plane, like the A-10, (not judging whether one should or shouldn’t) which is more expensive to maintain because the supplier base is limited for old aircraft parts, is you not only lose the aircraft costs, you lose all the costs associated with it, ie, training apparatus, suppliers, spare parts, etc. Maintaining some jets in the end costs takes from other areas, such as more modern jets or readiness or modernization.

  4. Frank Oliveri

    June 19, 2014
    2:48 p.m.

    the military increasingly relies on weapons, rather than airframes, when it comes to knocking out tanks, or providing close air support. AF Chief of Staff Gen. Welsh has argued that putting certain types of precision weapons on fast moving jets, whether it’s an F-16, and F-15E, a B-1B bomber, or F/A-18s, among others, enable them to kill tanks and provide close air support very effectively. A-10s have only flown a relatively small portion of close air support missions in Afghanistan. In the 1991 war, one of the most effective tank killers in the US arsenal was the F-111, a Vietnam era, fast-moving, somewhat maneuverable jet. Nonetheless, the A-10 is a great fighter with a very specialized capability, and it enjoys very strong support in Congress. It comes down to priorities and tradeoffs, when one considers the budget limitations.


    June 19, 2014
    11:43 p.m.


    • Richard Contreras

      June 24, 2014
      5:44 p.m.

      Dude, the Dems control the Senate in the United States. Were you thinking of some other country?

    • Ray Prescott

      June 24, 2014
      9:13 p.m.

      And why do they need such long term unemployment? Laziness, no jobs, communist at the helm?

  6. Greenie Beanie

    June 20, 2014
    2:45 a.m.

    Among others, Darwin used Adam Smith’s work on morals, conduct, and character to develop his theories regarding biological evolution.

  7. rdlynn

    Oct. 25, 2014
    4:09 p.m.

    Weapons systems like the A-10 must be cut to save more important and productive programs such as welfare, food stamps, destruction of the medical system, mass immigration to transform America and end White Privilege, and many more programs to build the egalitarian utopian state.

  8. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    8:17 a.m.

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

  9. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:27 a.m.

    Outstanding post, I believe website owners should acquire a lot from this web site its real user genial.

  10. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    5:16 a.m.

    Good write-up, I am regular visitor of one’s site, maintain up the nice operate, and It is going to be a regular visitor for a lengthy time.

  11. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    7:42 a.m.

    Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Therefore let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!

  12. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    1:49 p.m.

    Awsome info and straight to the point. I am not sure if this is actually the best place to ask but do you guys have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thank you :)

  13. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    3:58 a.m.

    I enjoy what you guys are usually up too. Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve added you guys to my own blogroll.

  14. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    4:54 a.m.

    Some really fantastic articles on this web site, regards for contribution.

  15. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    3:21 a.m.

    Very interesting topic, appreciate it for posting. “I am not an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world.” by Socrates.

  16. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    4:57 a.m.

    Hello, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, superb blog!

  17. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    10:08 a.m.

    I always was interested in this subject and still am, regards for posting.

  18. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    1:42 p.m.

    You made some clear points there. I looked on the internet for the subject matter and found most guys will consent with your website.

  19. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    11:41 p.m.

    It is truly a nice and useful piece of info. I?¦m glad that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  20. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    12:33 a.m.

    Hello, i feel that i saw you visited my website thus i came to “go back the choose”.I am trying to find issues to enhance my site!I guess its adequate to make use of a few of your ideas!!

  21. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    9:26 p.m.

    Great ?V I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task..

  22. Anonymous

    July 26, 2015
    12:16 a.m.

    Some truly wonderful articles on this internet site, regards for contribution.

  23. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    5:53 a.m.

    I am always searching online for articles that can assist me. Thanks!

  24. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    3:12 p.m.

    Good day very nice website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds also…I am satisfied to find so many helpful info here in the publish, we’d like work out more strategies in this regard, thank you for sharing. . . . . .

  25. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    4:55 p.m.

    Good blog! I truly love how it is easy on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified when a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your RSS which must do the trick! Have a nice day!

  26. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    9:51 a.m.

    Hello there, You’ve done a fantastic job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this site.

  27. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    11:35 a.m.

    Hmm it looks like your site ate my first comment (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any points for first-time blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

  28. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    12:07 p.m.

    Wow! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a totally different subject but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Outstanding choice of colors!

  29. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    2:47 p.m.

    I truly appreciate this post. I¦ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thx again

  30. Anonymous

    Aug. 4, 2015
    4:57 a.m.

    pSQC7r Well I definitely liked studying it. This information provided by you is very useful for good planning.

  31. Anonymous

    Aug. 6, 2015
    4:09 a.m.

    I am typically to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your web site and preserve checking for brand spanking new information.

  32. Anonymous

    Aug. 6, 2015
    7:55 a.m.

    Fantastic blog! Do you have any tips and hints for aspiring writers? I’m planning to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I’m completely confused .. Any ideas? Thanks a lot!

  33. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    4:22 a.m.

    Thanks for another magnificent article. The place else may just anybody get that kind of information in such an ideal approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m at the look for such information.

  34. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    6:32 a.m.

    Hello there, You have done a great job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this web site.

  35. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    6:26 p.m.

    Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so any support is very much appreciated.

  36. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    10:09 p.m.

    You made some first rate points there. I looked on the internet for the problem and found most people will go along with with your website.

  37. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    6:05 p.m.

    I got what you mean , thanks for posting.Woh I am pleased to find this website through google.

  38. Emiko Faylor

    Aug. 26, 2015
    1:38 a.m.

    What are you saying, man? I realize everyones got their own view, but really? Listen, your blog is neat. I like the energy you put into it, specially with the vids and the pics. But, come on. Theres gotta be a better way to say this, a way that doesnt make it seem like everyone here is stupid!

  39. Linh Casbeer

    Aug. 30, 2015
    9:32 p.m.

    Howdy sir?you have a really nice blog layout ???

  40. Anonymous

    Sept. 3, 2015
    6:13 a.m.

    NivE2w I really liked your blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on

  41. desene animate pentru copii

    Sept. 9, 2015
    9:51 p.m.

    Im obliged for the blog article.Really thank you! Great.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...