Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 7, 2016

Did Pakistan Let Haqqani Network Slip Away on Purpose? (Official Says “No”)

Pakistani schoolchildren stand at the spot where Nasiruddin Haqqani, a senior leader of the feared militant Haqqani network, was assassinated at an Afghan bakery in the Bhara Kahu area on the outskirts of Islamabad on Nov. 11. AAMIR QURESHI (Aamir Quereshi AFP/Getty Images)

Pakistani schoolchildren stand at the spot where Nasiruddin Haqqani, a senior leader of the feared militant Haqqani network, was assassinated at an Afghan bakery in the Bhara Kahu area on the outskirts of Islamabad on Nov. 11. AAMIR QURESHI (Aamir Quereshi AFP/Getty Images)

Leaders in Pakistan have declared it of late, both publicly and privately: The country is going after all militants, even the Haqqani network, an organization that U.S. military officials have deemed a de facto arm of the Pakistan intelligence agency ISI.

Some have raised doubts about whether that’s actually happening, though, pointing to evidence that Haqqani network militants have merely shifted elsewhere, with the complicity of Pakistan. A senior Pakistani official insisted Thursday that Pakistan wants the Haqqani network destroyed, but that to a certain degree it’s in the hands of Afghanistan, NATO and the United States.

“I’m a little amused by these remarks,” the official said, speaking with a small group of reporters under condition of anonymity. “For anyone who knows the terrain, 50,000 on an average cross each day 2,600 kilometers of border, unmanned and unmonitored. Here I see with all your technology and resources that you have not been able to secure your border,” the official said, referring to the current influx of undocumented and unaccompanied minors.

“No. 2, for weeks and months it was being debated in Pakistan publicly that if the dialogue process fails the government will go into military operations,” the official continued. “The Haqqani or others were prepared to flee the country. Third, when they were fleeing, what was the the leadership of the U.S. and NATO and ISAF [International Security Assistance Force] doing? Did we tell them not to take these people out? In fact, sir, we requested the Americans to help us take them out when they were fleeing and if they were fleeing.”

The official said that Pakistan warned U.S. officials early on, as they were preparing military options, that some militants might flee.

“You have the technology, you have the means, you are sitting across the border, please take them out,” the official said. “Please eliminate them. you’d be doing us and yourselves a great good. Please do not permit these people to disappear. Take them out, eliminate them, capture them. We use the terminology used by many people in the past: There should be a hammer and anvil. the Pakistan hammer saw no evidence of the anvil on the other side.”

It makes no sense, the official said, for Pakistan to risk so many lives and spend so much money just to “let them escape,” and that “militants, whatever hue and color they may be, are a threat to Pakistan.”

Despite the gripes in both directions, over those issues and U.S. drone strikes, “U.S.-Pakistan relations are no longer in the headlines,” and that “pleases us immensely,” the official said. The tensions from 2011 and 2012 are behind the countries and they’re strengthening bilateral relations, the official said.

Comments (14)

  1. چھوٹا ڈریگن ®

    July 25, 2014
    10:49 p.m.

    Finally someone is drilling some sense to the Americans. All the US has done so far is to accuse Pakistan of XYZ fantasies. The fact is that ISAF despite all of its resources is sitting like a bride on her first night. Pakistan has been asking ISAF to engage the cross border movement of terrorists, however ISAF has chosen not to respond because blaming Pakistan is more easier than fighting militants.

  2. anObserver

    July 29, 2014
    5:23 a.m.

    There is no such thing as ‘legitimacy’ left in Pakistan. This is not a single country. The only way to ‘solve’ some of its problems would be to ‘decentralize’ control. Divide Pakistan into smaller countries – each with their own destinies. Long term, I think the people of Pakistan (taking everybody, not just the city folks in the South) would be happier.
    Of course the ruling elite does not want this. The US does not want this – today they can negotiate & blame a single so called ‘government’.

  3. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    2:42 p.m.

    I like this web blog so much, saved to favorites.

  4. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    5:50 a.m.

    I am often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

  5. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    11:08 a.m.

    Appreciating the hard work you put into your site and in depth information you offer. It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed material. Wonderful read! I’ve saved your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  6. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    10:24 p.m.

    Keep working ,fantastic job!

  7. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    7:35 p.m.

    Hiya, I am really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is actually annoying. A good website with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web-site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.

  8. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    9:05 a.m.

    Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.

  9. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    2:15 p.m.

    Hello my loved one! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and include approximately all significant infos. I?¦d like to look extra posts like this .

  10. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    1:24 p.m.

    very nice put up, i definitely love this website, carry on it

  11. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    9:58 a.m.

    Spot on with this write-up, I truly think this web site wants much more consideration. I’ll in all probability be again to read rather more, thanks for that info.

  12. Anonymous

    Aug. 6, 2015
    9:11 a.m.

    Some times its a pain in the ass to read what blog owners wrote but this site is very user friendly! .

  13. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    7:51 a.m.

    Very interesting info!Perfect just what I was looking for!

  14. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    6:07 p.m.

    Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with a few pics to drive the message home a bit, but instead of that, this is wonderful blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...