Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 28, 2015

What the Pentagon Might Recommend to Congress on Acquisition Overhaul Next Year

Congress is going to look very closely as soon as next year’s defense policy bill at overhauling how the Defense Department spends its massive budget on hardware and services. On Tuesday, the department official tasked with generating recommendations for Capitol Hill hinted at what the Pentagon does and does not want.

Likely in: bolstering the acquisition workforce, streamlining the current system. Likely out: a totally rewritten set of rules, separate rules governing purchases of information technology.

Andrew Hunter, executive secretary of the Warfighter Senior Integration Group and director of the Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell, said during a panel discussion hosted by the Brookings Institution that the department isn’t expected to make recommendations until next year. House Armed Services Vice Chairman William M. “Mac” Thornberry, the Texas Republican leading the effort and the favorite to take the full committee’s gavel next year, has said the overhaul would be a “several years” process.

Hunter said the top thing Congress could do would be to permanently get rid of sequestration, the mandated across-the-board cuts put in place in 2011, but added that he realized that was a “pie in the sky” hope. But beyond that, he said Congress should maintain the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund, created to answer the cutbacks of the 1990s and since used to improve the training of defense acquisition personnel.

Although the subject of the Brookings discussion was primarily about how the Defense Department can keep paces with rapid changes in information technology, Hunter rejected the idea that there should be a separate set of rules for purchasing IT, given existing statutes that have become ossified over time.

“If we create a separate system for any individual commodity or product, say IT for example, we run the risk that we create a separate new, rigid and inflexible system,” he said. “We need to have that flexibility to cover the entire set of equipment, goods and services the department needs to buy.”

And overall, Hunter said, “An entirely brand new set of rules or a slew of new rules would be unhelpful. We really do think streamlining the rule set and  flexibility and tailoring is the way to go.”

Other changes being looked at, Hunter said, include cutting down from four potentially applicable acquisition oversight systems to one, addressing the burden of checklists that must be met at certain milestones in a program’s acquisition process and eliminating certain rigid statutory requirements that create a “presumption of error or almost bad faith” on the part of the department.

Jon Etherton, senior fellow at the National Defense Industrial Association, said it might not necessarily be the case that legislation is the best answer for what ails Pentagon acquisition, and Hunter outlined several initiatives the department has taken up on its own to improve acquisition. Tom Sisti, senior director and chief legislative counsel for SAP America, noted that many of the same acquisition problems that exist today — like the need for a trained workforce and smart business processes — seem to come up again and again.

Comments (13)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    11:56 a.m.

    Really Appreciate this article, how can I make is so that I get an alert email whenever you make a new article?

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  2. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    6:24 a.m.

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

    http://despedidasdesolteraz.weebly.com/blog

  3. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    4:27 p.m.

    Some times its a pain in the ass to read what people wrote but this site is really user friendly! .

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  4. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    3:03 a.m.

    I have been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or blog posts on this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website. Studying this info So i?¦m glad to exhibit that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I such a lot indubitably will make sure to do not disregard this site and provides it a glance on a constant basis.

    http://jmccred1.hospedagemdesites.ws/wiki/index.php?title=Auto_Insurance_For_Low_Mileage_Drivers

  5. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    8:17 a.m.

    Saved as a favorite, I really like your blog!

    http://lowcostautoquotes.com/lowest-auto-insurance.html

  6. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    11:36 a.m.

    Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Nowadays bloggers publish just about gossips and net and this is actually irritating. A good website with interesting content, that is what I need. Thank you for keeping this website, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.

    http://split.us

  7. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    8:18 p.m.

    Outstanding post, I conceive people should larn a lot from this weblog its real user genial.

    https://bestplumbers.com

  8. Anonymous

    July 26, 2015
    12:25 a.m.

    It?¦s in point of fact a nice and useful piece of info. I am happy that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

    http://www.brownpapertickets.com/profile/1166915

  9. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    4:22 a.m.

    Wonderful work! This is the type of info that should be shared around the internet. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my web site . Thanks =)

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  10. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    6:11 p.m.

    I appreciate your piece of work, regards for all the informative blog posts.

    http://brookereviews.com/product/david-andrews-diabetes-destroyer-review-10-features-you-should-know/

  11. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    1 p.m.

    I rattling glad to find this site on bing, just what I was looking for : D as well bookmarked.

    http://przedszkole-roza.pl/

  12. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    12:26 p.m.

    My brother recommended I may like this web site. He used to be entirely right. This submit actually made my day. You cann’t imagine just how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thank you!

    http://www.consultdustry.com/send-resume/

  13. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    5:32 p.m.

    I like this web blog very much so much good info .

    http://topcheapinsurance.com/companies-insurance-united-states.html

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...