Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
April 23, 2014

For Camp’s Tax Overhaul Plan, ‘Dead on Arrival’ May Be Beside the Point

camp 179 022614 445x296 For Camps Tax Overhaul Plan, Dead on Arrival May Be Beside the Point

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

What is the point of launching a trial balloon that has already been fatally shot full of holes?

That was the rhetorical question of the day Wednesday, when House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp ceremonially unveiled his plan for the biggest tax overhaul in three decades. The Michigan Republican did so hours after his extensively leaked idea — and the entire topic of an IRS rulebook rewrite — had been marked as a 2014 legislative dead letter by both of his party’s top congressional leaders.

There actually were strategic, selfish and political rationales for Camp to go ahead with his lonely news conference.

Bipartisan support for the concept of a top-to-bottom tax code revamp has been building steadily for more than a decade, but until now no one with the power to get the process started has even attempted a comprehensive stab at the problem. So Camp will get some unavoidable credit, and some tactical advantage, by being the credible lawmaker willing to make the first move.

The debate is probably going to take years to finish, but someone had to start it. And by volunteering to be that guy, his “chairman’s mark” will be the paper against which all future opening bids are going to get compared. As a result, the Michigan Republican’s concepts for simplifying the rate structure and curbing the clutter of tax breaks have a relatively decent chance of making it into whatever bill inevitably moves later in the decade.

If reconfiguring the 7,000 pages of filing instructions has to begin as something of a game of 52-card pickup, then the person who first scatters the deck across the room starts with some advantage.

As a personal matter, he really has nothing to lose. Because of House GOP term limits, from which he’s not going to be given an exemption, Camp has to turn in his gavel at the end of the year. That means he is nearly out of time for wrapping up the project on which he’s been laboring for three years. And once his partner in the effort, Max Baucus, relinquished the Senate Finance chairmanship to become ambassador to China, there was no reason to delay any longer. Camp wasn’t going to find a new Democratic partner in time to unveil a bipartisan starting point.

As a matter of campaign-season positioning, Camp may have also done many of his fellow Republicans something of a favor.

To be sure, there is some needless danger in getting all specific about such a hot-button topic as taxes in an election year when there’s no realistic hope of a resolution.

But there are several political upsides to Camp’s big (and extraordinarily detailed) reveal. The Joint Committee on Taxation summary and “scoring” runs to more than 18 pages of footnotes and tables in tiny type. (Despite hundreds of changes shifting trillions of dollars, the bottom line is that the bill would generate only $3 billion more in revenue during the next decade than the status quo.)

The GOP leadership’s decision to sidecar the tax debate aligns with its strategy for the midterms, which is to do little more than badmouth the president and especially his health care law. But some candidates will conclude they need to be in favor of bold new ideas, not just against Obama, and for them the Camp plan could be just the ticket.

They can point to a JCT estimate that its reforms would add at least 1 point to the rate of annual economic growth for the next decade — while at the same time reducing taxes and simplifying accounting life for the vast majority of Americans. (The top individual rate would drop to 25 percent from 39.6 percent, the standard deduction and the child tax credit would go up and plenty of other loopholes would be tightened or closed. The end result, the JCT estimates, is that the number of filers who itemize would drop to 5 percent from about 35 percent.)

Beyond that, the chairman’s plan includes just enough of the proposals President Barack Obama has been pushing to neutralize a good bit of the Democratic campaign rhetoric about the GOP being the party of the rich. That leaves the Republicans to ponder whether they really want to campaign on the notion that a tax rewrite should raise hundreds of billions in new revenue to meet long-term budget goals. (The richest 1 percent of workers would face a 10 percent surtax on their salaries. Another surtax would be levied on the nation’s six biggest banks. A wrinkle that permits investment managers to avoid most income taxes would be scrapped. Tax breaks for company jets would be curbed. More than $100 billion in corporate taxes would be dedicated to overdue public works projects.)

And if all of that proves unpersuasive, there’s this somewhat-cynical-sounding but entirely true benefit for the capital’s economy: The Camp bill may be properly cited as The Tax Lobbyists’ Full Employment and Economic Stimulus Act of 2014.

Even though the measure is highly unlikely to make it onto the House floor — and will struggle to get a majority from the roster of 23 Republicans and 16 Democrats during its not-going-to-be-scheduled-anytime-soon markup at Ways and Means — law firms and K Street shops will generate countless billable hours just by parsing the bill’s language and coming up with strategies for preserving all the niche deductions, exclusions and exemptions that have only theoretically been placed in jeopardy.

Working indefinitely to prevent something bad from happening to a client is the lifeblood of the advocacy industry, and Camp’s official opening of this tax debate has made sure that dozens of those costly crusades will last for years.

  • Andre Leonard

    Nice to think about tax reform, but our two party monopoly government needs to feed the machine that pays their corporate handlers.

    We did not get to $17 trillion in debt by having thrifty and prudent stewards of the public’s fiscal trust.

  • One Thirsty Bear

    At least most Americans can finally agree that Obama is the problem.

  • rsubber

    So, $3 billion in net new tax revenue over the next decade.

    $3 billion is more or less peanuts when we think about the money we need to spend for infrastructure repairs, environmental cleanup and protection, education, health care, national defense…..

    What happened to all the talk about “reducing the national deficit” and
    “reducing the national debt”?

    We can’t put our national government and our national economy on
    sounder footing without spending more money, and that means raising taxes. I
    know it. You know it. We’re not going to “fix” the national debt by sending some
    welfare cheats, and some Social Security cheats, and some corporate bad guys to jail.

    This “tax reform” proposal is a charade.

    It’s a talking point for politicians who are heading out on the campaign trail.
    More on my blogs:
    Barley Literate
    History: Bottom Lines

  • Maurice D Murphy

    A cynical attitude with a great deal of egotism doesn’t do the commentator any favor. Such a know-it-all stance is not what we need now in this discussion.

  • Bundle Up

    Here we find a delusional Nancy Pelosi desperately attempting to defend Hussein Obama’s lies about your medical care: http://youtu.be/gw3yoyIw3oM

  • Henry Ko
  • Herb Smith

    it doesn’t matter how many in Congress want some kind of comprehensive top-to-bottom tax reform. It’s not going to happen because there’s no chance of enough compromising of principles to get a majority behind all the details of any single comprehensive plan. Tax reform can only be done piecemeal or not at all. Do it one or two loopholes at a time. Or find someway to do it like BRAC.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...