Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
April 24, 2014

Lois Lerner’s Gambit Has Guaranteed She’ll Talk — Some Day

Room 2154 of the Rayburn Building was the scene of the most publicly electrifying, if not illuminating, moment so far in the IRS controversy — a widely televised staging of a recurring set piece in American political theater.

By the time Lois Lerner was sworn in at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing Wednesday, a clattering symphony of cameras at her feet, everyone in the room knew the essence of what was coming next. She had served notice the night before that she would invoke her constitutional right against self-incrimination and decline to answer questions about her work as head of the IRS office that decides which organizations deserve tax-exempt status. That would be the office that applied an especially strict review to tea party and other conservative groups.

But before taking the Fifth, she broke from the playbook ever so briefly. “I have not done anything wrong,” Lerner read from a paper before her. “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other committee.”

That categorical 17-second statement was played over and over on cable news for hours, allowing Lerner to control the IRS scandal headline of the day. But sneaking it into the script also infuriated her congressional inquisitors, who are sure to make a fevered search for contradictory evidence an essential part of the committee’s coming months of tax agency oversight.

Lawmakers really don’t like being outfoxed in their own house, especially by a previously anonymous bureaucrat acting with the help of a lawyer renowned for defending the scandal-tarred. (William W. Taylor III’s most infamous recent client was Dominique Strauss-Kahn.) So if they find reason to believe Lerner did act improperly in any of the ways she denies, she can count on Congress to dump on her like the proverbial ton of bipartisan bricks.

Members of Congress look to be on pretty solid ground with their complaints that Lerner and other senior IRS officials — including Douglas Shulman, who ran the agency until last fall and has come off as loquaciously unrepentant in his two turns as a Hill witness this week — were not at all forthcoming last year. Lawmakers and their aides had inquired about reports they had heard during the run-up to the 2012 elections, mainly from tea party groups back home, that their tax-exempt applications were being unfairly singled out for purgatory until after the elections.

From blacklisted screenwriter Lillian Hellman in 1952 to disgraced slugger Mark McGwire in 2005, prominent Americans have been taking the Fifth on the Hill in the hope of wriggling free of public opprobrium, congressional scrutiny and federal prosecution. Almost always, they do so without creating any rhetorical opening that could get them into even deeper hot water than where they started.

It’s a whole lot safer that way. Congress as an institution may be in record low regard, and its prospects for major legislative achievement may be receding by the day. But not telling lawmakers the whole truth and nothing but is still a federal crime, whether witnesses are formally sworn in or not. And the courses of several promising careers, as well as of a few profitable companies, have been altered by such perjury investigations.

In a settlement with the government that included a $4.5 billion fine, one of the 14 felonies that BP executives admitted to last year was lying to Congress about the amount of oil discharged into the Gulf of Mexico during the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. Also last year, federal prosecutors spent 10 weeks in trial seeking to prove that fabled pitcher Roger Clemens had lied to House Oversight during a nationally televised hearing in February 2008, when he denied using steroids and human growth hormone. (He was acquitted.)

The executives of seven major tobacco companies saw their careers falter and their businesses suffer after they declared together, under oath before House Energy and Commerce in 1994, that they believed nicotine was not addictive. They were never indicted. Two years earlier, though, CIA official Clair George was convicted of lying to Congress about the Iran-Contra affair. Michael Deaver was convicted in 1987 of lying to Energy and Commerce about how quickly he spun through the revolving door between the Reagan White House and K Street. In 1973, Richard Helms was convicted of lying to lawmakers about his efforts as CIA director to engineer election fraud in Chile.

At a federal courthouse, Lerner would have opened herself up to cross-examination by taking the stand to profess her hands were clean. She ticked off the lawyer-lawmakers on the Oversight Committee all the more by exploiting a wrinkle in the rules that allowed her to have it both ways this time. They have already signaled they’ll use the trump card at their disposal, which is a grant of immunity that will compel her to set down her Fifth Amendment shield.

She’s made herself into more of a Hill celebrity than she could have imagined when she began her career as a civil-service lawyer 34 years ago.

  • Stan Welli

    This testy exchange was reminiscent of the one on July 27, 1989 when former IRS Commissioner Lawrence Gibbs and Deputy Commissioner Mike Murphy appeared at hearings convened by the Commerce, Consumer and Monetary Affairs Sub Committee of the House Government Operations Committee. The subject was the Congressional investigation of IRS Senior Employee Misconduct Problems.

    In his testimony, Deputy Commissioner Murphy was glib and condescending, in effect, a prototype of Messrs. Doug Shulman and Steve Miller in the current hearings. But Committee Chairman Doug Barnard (D-Georgia) would have none of it and laid into Murphy.

    ” . . . I cannot believe that you would come before this committee today and gloss over as you so eloquently have done, 12 months of our subcommittee’s investigation. I just cannot imagine that. . . . All you have done is repeat everything we have said, and at the same time, depict that career attitude of the IRS that ‘We can do no wrong.’

    “Mr. Murphy, I am just astounded that you would come to this committee with this report and completely ignore what has been said in the last three days.

    ” . . . Now, let me just say, it’s hard for me to sit here and listen to you Mr. Murphy, because the fact is you have just completely glossed over our findings–the IRS world that you describe is a world where wrongdoers are systematically punished and whistleblowers are applauded. That is a world I don’t recognize, not from our investigations. It’s like the Land of Oz and you are the Wizard. It’s not a real world that you describe today.

    “The real world is where employees throughout your agency are afraid to come forward to report wrongdoing or to cooperate in investigations of their superiors because of fear of retaliation. The real world of the IRS is where if you are not a team player, you are off the team.”

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...