Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 11, 2016

Tea Party Freshman Puts D.C. Speed Cameras in the Cross Hairs

House Republicans have shown their interest in micromanaging the municipal affairs of Washington, D.C., time and again. The range of their interests may soon get stretched again.

For the past two decades, these crusades have been all about making the nation’s capital a sort of social policy Petri dish in which to experiment on such hot-button issues as charter schools, gun control, abortion rights, medical marijuana and needle exchanges for drug addicts.

Now, the shifting interests of the House GOP’s tea party generation are about to land on a new target: The city’s speed cameras.

Rep. Kerry Bentivolio, a conservative freshman from the outer Detroit suburbs, is known best around town as the new congressman with the quirkiest résumé, which includes stints as a reindeer rancher and Santa Claus impersonator. But he’s about to introduce, as one of his first bills, a measure that would turn off the legions of cameras around the city that document drivers speeding and running red lights, and which generate about $90 million a year in ticket payments in the process.

At first blush, seeking a federal rewrite of one local traffic ordinance would seem about the farthest thing imaginable from small-government conservatism. But there’s also a widening libertarian streak in the House Republican Conference, and these members say the cameras are a pernicious Big Brother intrusion into everyday life that could lead to improper government snooping into our lives and already guarantee a lack of due process for motorists. Legislation to restrict their use has been enacted in a dozen states.

(Bentivolio says personal animus has nothing to do with it, because he doesn’t even have a car in Washington and so hasn’t received any grainy photos and tickets in the mail.)

So far, only two other tea party types have signed on to the bill, Steve Stockman of Texas and David Schweickert of Arizona, suggesting not much of a groundswell of support. But, if the appropriations bill that covers the federal payments to the capital city comes before the House this year (which at this point looks unlikely), offering an amendment to block any spending on D.C. speed cameras would probably be permitted.

And a lopsided majority of Republicans, eager to take a stand for civil liberties without annoying anyone at city halls in their own districts, could vote for it. It would then be up to the Senate to laugh off the idea, which is very likely.

This was the topic of my most recent appearance on WAMU, the NPR station in Washington. You can listen here or read about it here.

  • heviduty

    Someone needs to address these cameras nationwide. The are just a trap to fleese the public for more money. The ones who are getting 11/2 the money is the camera companys, not a good deal for citizens or the government.

  • Sandra Victor

    Bentivolio’s got a point though if not very strong. The cameras do take up a lot of budget and generate a lot of revenue for the government but the drivers do not benefit from this very much, except that because of following the speed limits they’d stay away from lethal accidents and injuries. I agree with Bentivolio partially as I think the cameras should be cut-down so the cost of camera expense and maintenance would come down; but I believe that some of the cameras should still be put in practice to offer better security to the general public.

    Sandra V.

    • TRonJ

      Its hard to go anywhere fast in DC much less at lethal speeds. These photo-cams are there to generate money, that’s all. And from the looks of DC roads, they aren’t putting the money to good use anyway.

  • SammyBaxter

    What about getting the federal gov’t out of our lives? How is this a federal issue??

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...