Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 14, 2016

Capitol Police Chief: We Are Not the ‘Media Police’

Dine reassured journalists in the wake of press-police run-in that future media encounters will be better handled. (Photo By Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call)

Dine reassured journalists in the wake of press-police run-in that future media encounters will be better handled. (Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Capitol Police Chief Kim C. Dine clarified that his officers are not the “media police,” following a March 28 police-press run-in that nearly resulted in the arrest of a journalist.

Dine also apologized for the incident, in which an officer briefly detained BloombergBNA’s Ari Natter and demanded Natter’s driver’s license and Social Security number, after the reporter allegedly jostled the cop while trying to ask Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy a question.

In an April 10 meeting with Heather Rothman, chairwoman of the Executive Committee of Periodical Correspondents, and press gallery staff, Dine said he wished the incident had been better handled, according to sources in attendance.

News of Natter’s brush with law enforcement raised concerns among congressional reporters that police might interfere with their attempts to interact with the high-profile officials who are escorted around the Capitol by security details. Some questioned whether police “actions could have a chilling effect on future police-media interactions,” Rothman said.

Dine assured reporters that Capitol Police don’t care who is asking questions or what they are trying to ask, as long as they are a credentialed member of the press. He said his department’s job is to provide security and help move people around the Hill.

“The meeting went well and was very productive,” Dine said in an email to CQ Roll Call. Capitol Police fulfills “many roles in our status as a unique police agency and some of the most important things we do is protect the rights of citizens to express themselves and protect the freedom of the press as we go about our duties protecting and serving the legislative process.

“Our folks do this on practically a daily basis almost always with skill, tact and diplomacy,” he continued. “As such, we in fact are committed to excellence in our officers’ daily interactions with members, staff, our media partners, and the public. I, too, pledge to continue to work together.”

Dine also reiterated the contents of a February memo on interacting with the media, in which he notified officers that members of the media are permitted in an area closer than the general public that should safely afford a view of the scene, without interfering with law enforcement operations. He also emphasized that reporters need to make sure they have their press credentials on them at all times and visible.

In the wake of what Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance W. Gainer described as a “kerfuffle,” Rothman said she felt “pleased and reassured that Capitol Police views this as an isolated situation and that [Dine] wishes it had been handled differently.”

“We opened up a line of communication that wasn’t necessarily there in the past,” she said.

  • darthgidget

    the pres should not be so arrogant when they are on the hill either. They don’t have greater rights than anyone else, but are afforded better access. still doesn’t mean they can push people around. I remember Wolf Blitzer telling the security forces at Langley AFB to move out of his way when the first tac fighter wing returned from desert storm. He said they were in the way of his shot. His solution was they should move in front of some other reporter’s shot. They re there to provide security and keep the press and others away from the jets when they parked. I told the dog handler to stand where she was and release her dog if wolf crossed the line.

  • Alice Boxstrom

    Recognizing our own ignorance of the unseen complexities around us is an important awareness associated with the argument for liberty.

  • Jon Johnston

    Although we may respect the values of those we disagree with, we have no moral obligation to tolerate those who work to undermine liberty.

  • Alexis Bannister

    Carelessly using the word “democracy” is dangerous because it implies that democracy’s potential good mandates its continuous expansion.

  • Robert Price Rifkin

    in doubt, make it up. This seems to be the mantra of the New Republican Party,
    as it looks down the barrel of a 2016 election it fears more than Mothra. My
    discuss all things politics and publishing, if you want to read more.

    few weeks ago, Hillary Clinton released her new autobiography and the
    collective reaction of the Republican pundits was a kind of quaking queasiness.
    You know, that old sinking feeling… Immediately the spin machine was pushed
    into first gear and we had the following news, delivered just days after the
    book release:

    Choices is a colossal failure. The book, which had decent sales during its
    first day (though disappointing, considering everyone expected nothing less
    than sales of one billion plus, out of the gate) plummeted in the days after
    its Tuesday publication. All indications are that “Hard Choices” will be a
    phenomenal disaster for its publisher, and for Hillary Clinton, who was obviously
    using the book as a finger-in-the-wind sort of test for her viability as a 2016

    did the pundits base these conclusions on? Fantasy. Wishful thinking. Nonsense.
    Now, a few days later, what is the truth about the performance of “Hard
    Choices?” Check out the New York Times Bestseller List. “Hard Choices?” Number
    one. Is Hillary Clinton still the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in
    2016? Ask the Republican pundits. Probably not…

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...