Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
October 22, 2014

DC Vote Presses Senators on Autonomy, Citing Support for NFL Name Change

marchonwashington 004 082313 440x287 DC Vote Presses Senators on Autonomy, Citing Support for NFL Name Change

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

The 50 senators advocating a name change for the Washington Redskins out of respect for tribal sovereignty are being asked to take a stand on behalf of the District’s quest for greater autonomy.

DC Vote sent a letter on May 23 urging each senator to support three pieces of legislation to advance D.C. autonomy, including the “New Columbia Admission Act,” a bill to grant the District statehood that is sponsored by Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Thomas R. Carper, D-Del.

The May 22 letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell claims the city’s football team is “on the wrong side of history.”

DC Vote Executive Director Kimberly Perry hopes senators recognize that a similar logic applies to the plight of the disenfranchised citizens of the District, who have no voting representation on Capitol Hill. 

“Congress can put the United States on the right side of history,” Perry said in a release. “We hope the Senators who feel compelled to weigh in on this issue will also take the time to consider how the unjust denial of democracy in the capital of the United States looks to people around the world.”

The full text of the letter is below:

Dear Senator,

Thank you so much for your recent initiative to weigh in on the naming of the Washington DC football team. It has been an important, yet provocative issue for the District of Columbia.

It is always inspiring when members of Congress rally behind an important issue. We would like to draw your attention to another pressing issue concerning the people of the District of Columbia.

The 646,000 DC residents are full American citizens that pay federal taxes, raise families, and defend democracy in the armed forces.  But we have no voting representation in Congress, and our local laws and budget are under Congressional control, unlike any other jurisdiction in the nation.

It is discouraging that we live in a country that prides itself in advocating for democracy around the world but still hasn’t resolved the issue of restoring basic democratic rights to residents of the nation’s capital.

In our view, this injustice sends a muddled message about our commitment to democratic principles.

There are currently 3 bills in the Senate that would grant the District of Columbia greater autonomy in its local affairs and restore equal rights to its citizens.

S. 2245: District of Columbia Paperwork Reduction Act: The Paperwork reduction act would eliminate the burden on congress to review all of DC’s local laws. Only 3 times since the requirement was enacted, has Congress blocked any law or measure.

S. 2246: District of Columbia Budget Accountability Act of 2014The Budget Accountability Act would separate DC’s local budget from the federal appropriations process, allowing DC to begin spending their local tax dollars without having to wait for Congressional approval.

S. 132: New Columbia Admission Act: This act would shrink the Federal District, and make the residential area of Washington, DC the 51st State.

We hope you will work collectively on restoring equal rights to citizens of the District of Columbia in the same way you are so strongly standing tall together on the NFL naming issue.

We would be pleased to come in and speak with you or answer any questions you might have about initiatives to secure full equality for the District of Columbia.

  • Jack Everett

    Like these shit for brains don’t have anything important to do.

  • DMHecker

    Those 50 Senators need to go back to work and get the real problems in this country fixed.
    Leave it to the Native American Indians to request a name change. I’m 1/6 Mohawk Indian, and I am proud of my Native American Indian Heritage. I’m proud to be a Red Skin, wish I was 100% Mohawk. No Non-Native American Indian should claim that being called a Red Skin is Racist, go back under the rock from which you came from.
    Washington, DC get out of things like this and fix the real problems that are facing this country. The only things you are willing to do, is to take away the rights of the people.

    • km

      The two largest organizations of indigenous people in the United States, representing upwards of 2 million people, have come out against the name. So based on what you said above and that…you would have to say to change the name too.

  • Jon Johnston

    If our decision making is to be free of external interference, boundaries must be set to establish limits inside which the agents and dictates of the state cannot meddle.

  • Mark Hammel

    Over the long term, all forms of collectivism depend upon plunder and require certain people to decide who gets what, when, and how.

  • guest

    clueless dolts

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...