Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 26, 2014

A Traditional Midterm Headache for Democrats

Democrats have had a nice run recently of interesting House recruits and new takeover opportunities resulting from open GOP seats. And yet, it probably won’t matter.

If history is any guide — and it usually is — the president’s recent problems have already overshadowed that good news for House Democrats and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, all but erasing any chances that the party can win back the House next year.

Sure, Republicans could easily overplay their hand, shutting down the government again or otherwise convincing voters that they are a greater threat to the nation’s economic health than are the Democrats.

Democrats will have opportunities to demonize congressional Republicans as soon as January and February, when Congress will need to take action to raise the debt ceiling and fund the government. They will have additional chances later in the year, when party leaders push other issues (immigration and possibly a higher minimum wage) that they hope will put Republicans on the defensive.

Any tea party victories over established Republican officeholders in primaries next year will also set off another round of stories (generated by reporters who easily gravitate to a familiar storyline and Democratic communications professionals) about how divided the GOP is and how extremists have taken over the party.

And if all that happens, Democrats might again have an opportunity to redirect the public’s attention away from the White House and back to the GOP’s performance in Congress during 2013 and 2014.

But that’s the point. The current trajectory of the midterms now strongly favors the GOP, putting the onus on Democrats to change what the 2014 elections will be about.

Unfortunately for Democrats, there is no sign that the public’s concern about the Affordable Care Act will be alleviated quickly. And even when the website finally is running as originally intended, questions about the law’s consequences are likely to persist through the midterms.

In addition, the normal buildup of fatigue with the president that often occurs in second terms will make it more difficult for President Barack Obama to sell his message beyond loyal Democratic voters.

The president will still be an asset as a fundraiser for Democratic campaign committees. The 14 fundraisers that he committed to earlier in the year, as reported by Roll Call in February, will raise funds that both the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the DCCC can use to protect incumbents and target GOP seats.

But unless the president’s poll numbers rebound strongly and Democrats can change the focus of the midterms, many voters will see next year’s balloting primarily as another opportunity to send a message to the White House. And with surveys generally showing the president’s job approval in the low 40s, the message isn’t likely to be one of approval and enthusiasm.

But won’t the Republican Party’s disastrous image offset the president’s problems? After all, Obama’s job approval is far higher than that of congressional Republicans.

The answer is an unambiguous “no,” unless Democrats can morph next year’s elections from a referendum on the president’s performance into a referendum on congressional Republicans.

That happened in 1998 because of impeachment. But things are very different now.

President Bill Clinton’s job approval numbers were very strong throughout 1998 thanks to the growing economy. While the Monica Lewinsky scandal hurt the president’s standing briefly, a Washington Post survey released less than a month before the midterms found Clinton’s job approval at 67 percent, a stratospheric number.

Clinton’s strength certainly goes a long way to explaining the election results that year. Democrats gained five House seats (taking them from 206 seats to 211) and broke even in the Senate, even though they were defending 18 seats to the GOP’s 16 seats.

Obama’s current job approval number is about 25 points below Clinton’s October 1998 poll number, and the national political environment looks as if it will be less favorable for the president’s party next year than it was in 1998.

A small net House gain for Republicans in 2014, which seemed unthinkable only six weeks ago, is no longer impossible. And over in the Senate, the Democrats’ prospects are decidedly more inauspicious than they were in mid-October, during the shutdown. The Senate obviously is in play.

A “typical” midterm currently seems to be shaping up for next year. That means that the president will be a drag on his party’s nominees in competitive contests and Democrats will spend much of their time on the defensive, trying to convince voters that they should not base their votes on their dissatisfaction with Obama’s performance. (For the long-term trend, see Table 2-4 in Vital Statistics on Congress, here.)

Some Democratic campaigns may well be able to do that, and I’m certainly not suggesting that a disastrous midterm is in store for Democrats. It’s too early to make that judgment.

But the very disappointing Obamacare launch, combined with the public’s much greater doubts about the entire legislation and the president’s honesty and judgment, will likely mean another difficult election for Obama’s party.

  • Rob_Chapman

    Obama’s current job approval number is about 25 points below Clinton’s October 1998 poll number,

    Wouldn’t a better comparison to make be with Clinton’s poll numbers at the same period of his presidency, eg. December of 87?

    Clinton had very high numbers for awhile, boosted by six years of economic expansion and federal surplusses.

    Obama may not achieve the same high numbers as Clinton, but the current trough of popularity is not permanent either.

    The Dems may enjoy limited electoral success in November, but it will not be for the reasons Rothenblog catalogs. Instead of bad news being a drag for Dems, good news will protect incumbents, eg, the GOP.

    The Obamacare roll out is a technical problem and will be fixed. The changes in health care plans, now that we are through the re-registration season, appear to be little more than the normal churning in the insurance market. It is highly unlikely that Obamacare will remain a drag for the Dems as the opposition it has engendered will very likely recede to only include hard core Republicans.

    It also appears that hiring and economic indicators that voters pay attention to are likely to improve mildly during 2014.

    Having a good crop of candidates in place will allow the Dems to take advantage of what, in 2014, will be a surprisingly good electoral environment for incumbents.

    • mabramso

      I don’t think so. 2014 will probably be similar to 2010, except that the GOP will not win so many House seats because the real damage was already done in 2010. This will keep the House a status quo. However, the Senate is entirely different. The Dems have to defend 7 seats in states that Romney won, 6 by double digits. And polls indicate that in most of these seats, the incumbents are very much in danger of losing their seats. Furthermore, there is an open seat in Michigan, which is about the 10th most vulnerable seat for flipping, which shows a Republican leading for the first time there since 1994. This looks like GOP+3 is a sure thing, GOP+7 is 50-50, and GOP+10 is possible.

      • Rob_Chapman

        Thanks for comment, Mr. Abrams.

        I disagree with you strongly about the comparison of 2010 to 2014.

        Polling at this point is not predictive as it is necessarily retrospective and the events that will determine the 2014 electon have not yet occurred.

        I think our best guide for prognostication lies in properly understanding the electoral trends revealed in our recent electoral history.

        In 06, 08 and in 2010, voters were extraordinarily angry over the manifest failures of business, government and other major American institutions. In 06 voters tilted strongly toward the left.

        In 08, there was some correction as voters replaced many GOP representatives with Blue Dog Democrats.

        In 2010, the voters in those districts tilted back toward their normal political orientation and elected the GOP iconoclasts we term the TEA Party.

        The red tide had reached its high point and in 2012 we saw signs of what will be the new orientations of American politics.

        The GOP clearly over performed in 2010 and will no more be able to sustain that than the Dems were able to carry forward ther momentum from the 06 and 08 cycles.

        2014 will, like 2012 be determined by the ground game.

        The high fund raising numbers of the Dem congressional, senate and super PACs indicate that they will be highly competitive against the GOP incumbents and in keeping most of their seats in the House and Senate.

        The big story, ie, the deciding factor of the 2014 cycle will be the GOP civil war. If the TEA Party continues to divided the GOP and imperil their ground game, it will be all Democrat in 2014 with the GOP being reduced to their blood red bastions in Dixie and the Great Plains.

        • mabramso

          Well, yes, polls this early are not usually very predictive. But that is because the polls usually show incumbents with big leads over relatively unknown (and undetermined) challengers, and upsets usually don’t show until much later in the cycle. However, when incumbents show this badly this far out, they usually do lose. And when the Dems are having trouble in a place like Michigan, which roughly ranks about 14th on the list of vulnerable seats, it’s a terrible sign for them. And no, I am not predicting the Dems to lose MI … at least not yet. But in a normal environment, this seat would be a SAFE Democrat seat. Heck, even the former Presidential spokesman admitted a couple of days ago that Democrats are going to have trouble holding on to the Senate. The Democrats are fighting uphill big-time because they have both history and demographics against them. And now Obamacare looks like it will be a pretty large albatross.

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...