Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
October 21, 2014

Democratic Retirements Put the Senate in Play

baucus008 061714 Democratic Retirements Put the Senate in Play

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

President Barack Obama’s slumping job approval rating isn’t doing Democrats any favors in the party’s quest to hold a majority in the Senate. But without a handful of Democratic retirements, the Senate likely wouldn’t be in play at all.

Republicans need a net gain of six Senate seats to get to 51 and control the Senate in the 114th Congress. To make that happen, Republicans will likely need to defeat at least two incumbents, if not three or four. That’s a difficult — but not insurmountable — task, considering Republicans defeated just two Democratic incumbents (both in 2010) in the past four election cycles combined.

But if a handful of Democratic senators had not chosen to retire this cycle, Republicans would have had a significantly more difficult path to a majority. The retirements of Sens. Max Baucus of Montana, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Tom Harkin of Iowa, Tim Johnson of South Dakota and Carl Levin of Michigan created good — some even great — GOP opportunities.

A couple of those Democrats may have had a serious test from Republicans in 2014, including Johnson and Rockefeller, but it’s highly unlikely all of them would be in the discussion of competitive races. The senators have a history of winning races in their states, and their re-election bids would have prevented some top Republican candidates from running at all.

Without those open seats, Republicans would have needed to defeat six incumbents instead of two or three. Historically, that would have been an extremely challenging task.

Republicans defeated a total of six Democratic senators over the past seven cycles and haven’t defeated more than three in a single cycle since 1980 — when the party knocked off a whopping nine.

This cycle has the potential for a perfect storm for Republicans, with four Democratic senators running for re-election in states President Barack Obama lost in 2012, and at least three of those are places where he is very unpopular. But Republicans likely won’t need to defeat all of them thanks to the open seats.

Related stories:

Top 10 Most Vulnerable Senators

John Walsh Drops Senate Bid in Montana

Rating Change: Montana Senate

Inside House Democrats’ Expanding Ground Game

Roll Call Election Map: Race Ratings for Every Seat

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call in your inbox or on your iPhone.

  • bubba_shawn

    If Republicans win the Senate majority, there will be more Senate Democrats retiring.

  • Ronald W. Mann

    Retirements have less to do with moving the senate than the complete show of incompetence by the dim party

    • blockmccloud

      wONDER why they don’t mention your party has a 19% approval rating. Your party is a complete and utter failure

  • blockmccloud

    Mitch mcconell will be retiring. The worthless obstructionist POS he is

  • YONATAN C

    BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES HAVE TURNED THEIR BACKS ON THE POOR AND UNEMPLOYED IN THIS COUNTRY. THERE ARE STILL MORE THAN 4 MILLION UNEMPLOYED WORKERS THAT ARE STILL WITHOUT AN UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSION OF BENEFITS SINCE LAST DECEMBER. THE REPUBLICANS HAVE SUCESSFULLY KILLED THE RETRO EXTENSION BILL IN THE SENATE, AND THE DEMOCRATS DID LITTLE TO FIGHT FOR THESE POOR FAMILIES. NOW MANY OF THESE FAMILIES HAVE HAD TO APPLY FOR WELFARE AND FOODSTAMPS IN ORDER TO CARE FOR THEIR FAMILIES. WE’RE BEING TOLD THAT THE ECONOMY IS BETTER AND THAT THERE ARE LESS PEOPLE APPLYING FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION. THE REASON THAT THIS MIGHT BE TRUE, IS THAT THESE WORKERS HAVE GIVEN UP APPLYING FOR UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS HAVE HAD TO SEEK GOVERNMENT AID INSTEAD. WHAT A SHAME AND A DISGRACE OF THESE TWO UNCARING POLITICAL PARTIES..

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...