Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 30, 2014

When Calling Something ‘Politics’ Is Mere Politics Itself

Last week, CBS News veteran correspondent Mark Knoller tweeted that “Pres Obama says he’ll do ‘whatever it takes’ to get Congress, esp GOP, ‘to think less about politics and party’ & do what’s good for US.”

I hear that sort of sentiment a lot — politicians telling each other to put partisanship aside and simply do what is best for the country. Most of the time, it’s a lot of baloney.

You can think that many Republican members of Congress are nuts, extremists or, to quote one Republican officeholder, “wacko birds” without thinking that they are taking stands merely because of “politics and party.”

I have been critical of purist conservatives and liberals who are unwilling to compromise on important issues where compromise is necessary to address crucial, immediate problems. But painting all opposition to the president’s agenda as merely “politics” or “partisanship” is nothing more than a political tactic. In other words, it is “politics.”

Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mike Lee and the couple of dozen House Republicans who seem to vote against everything cast their votes overwhelmingly because they think that passing those bills will hurt the country — not because they have decided to vote against anything the White House proposes.

Sure, there are times when opposition to something that is going to pass anyway is mere “politics.” The president knows something about that, since, once he was in the White House, he admitted that his votes against raising the debt ceiling were just politics. That’s not the case with tea party conservatives such as Cruz, Lee and Paul, who have complained often about the size of the debt and the need to shrink government, not grow it.

Yes, there is too much confrontation in this town and too little willingness to compromise on issues. And analysts/authors Norm Ornstein and Tom Mann may well be right in arguing in their book, “It’s Even Worse Than it Looks,” that the problem rests primarily with Republicans who are unwilling to meet Democrats even part of the way on crucial public policy issues.

But there is no reason to believe that members on both sides of the aisle whose voting records put them toward the ideological extremes of their parties — from Democrats Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Jim McGovern of Massachusetts and Raúl M. Grijalva of Arizona on the left to Republicans Steve King of Iowa, Jim Jordan of Ohio and Justin Amash of Michigan on the right — aren’t evaluating bills in terms of what they believe is best for their constituents or for the country.

  • Eric Lopez

    This may well be true of the true-believers like Paul and Cruz, but how do you explain the many instances of more mainstream Republicans abandoning their own proposals as soon the president endorses them? The individual mandate, cap & trade, the dream act, immigration, an infrastructure bank, etc.

    When the Senate tried to create the deficit commission in 2010, six senate republicans voted against a bill they were co-sponsors on. The president even managed to get the GOP opposed to small business tax credits. Either republicans were disingenuous when they initially supported these policies, or they were playing politics when the later opposed them.

    • jimbeau11

      Very well said.

  • GREENWOLFE GREEN

    Rothenberg. Are you really that much of a dunce? Is it true that you are so completely deaf that you cannot hear ideology when it is spoken? If you cannot distinguish between ideology, political positioning, and cultural hatred, I feel very sorry for you because it means you cannot do your job very well. At least the White House now has understood that distinction at last. Your job is to report that as Ornstein and Mann have done. If you can’t see that by now, then I see no reason why your opinion could possibly be respected anymore. Maybe you lean a bit to the right. That, in my view, would be the only reason you would still be propagating this particular view. That, I could understand. If so, you should be disregarded anyway.

  • Nancianne

    The disgraceful Congress evaluates bills based on how much $$$$$$ they have gotten from the lobbyists. Very sad !!!

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...