Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
February 13, 2016

Posts in "Education"

March 23, 2015

The Week Ahead: Internet of Things, Net Neutrality and More

Members of the Federal Communications Commission are back on the Hill this week, with Chairman Tom Wheeler and commissioner Ajit Pai testifying in budget and net neutrality hearings. Hearings and events on the Internet of Things are also on tap in the week ahead.


Georgetown University holds a panel discussion on discrimination and big data.


The Brookings Institution hosts a discussion with Craig Silliman, Verizon’s general counsel and executive vice president for public policy, on updating communications law and regulations.

An Energy and Commerce subcommittee holds a hearing on the Internet of Things.

A House Appropriations subcommittee holds an FCC budget hearing.

A House Science, Space and Technology subcommittee holds a hearing on the James Webb Space Telescope.

A Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation subcommittee holds a hearing on drones.


A House Judiciary subcommittee holds a hearing on abusive patent litigation.

The House Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the FCC’s net neutrality rules.


The FCC holds an open meeting.

A House Energy and Commerce subcommittee holds a hearing on spectrum policy.

Microsoft holds a panel discussion on the Internet of Things.

New America holds an event on mobile health data.

The Telecommunications Industry Association hosts an event on the Internet of Things.

February 12, 2015

Student Privacy, an Update in Law and Takeaways for Lawmakers

At the end of a House Education and the Workforce subcommittee hearing Thursday on the effect of new technology on student privacy, Chairman Todd Rokita, R-Ind., asked witnesses to sum up what he and his colleagues should keep in mind if they overhaul a 1974 law protecting the privacy of student records. President Barack Obama wants Congress to update the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, or FERPA, which of course was enacted before students had computers or cell phones, and Republicans appear to agree with him.

Here’s some of what the witnesses replied:

Shannon Sevier, vice president for advocacy at the National Parent Teacher Association:

“The take away for today is to consider parents as partners in education and not bystanders, to always support outreach and information, to consider not just who has the data and how it’s being stored, but how it’s being used in schools.”

“And whether or not parents have a right to review that information, because I can give consent, but if it’s a one-time thing, I’m still a bystander.”

Allyson Knox, director of education policy and programs at Microsoft:

“It’s very possible to strike a great balance between harnessing the power of personalized learning while also safeguarding our students’ data. Ask more from companies. There’s no question that they need to be transparent, articulate clear contracts, that they need to make sure that they have comprehensive data security systems and that they commit to not using that data for non-educational advertising practices.”

Sheryl R. Abshire, chief technology officer at Calcasieu Parish Public Schools in Louisiana:

“Please be careful in your consideration of what changes in this law and how they will filter down and affect the business of school districts educating students. While we’re painfully aware of the issues around student privacy and PII [personally identifiable information] I’m also painfully aware that it is a very difficult and complicated process to manage student learning and to be wise [stewards] of all this information. And so in terms of burden, we often talk about that. Seek out professionals in the field, practitioners that will have to implement what you decide to do around this.”

Joel R. Reidenberg, professor at Fordham University School of Law:

“Without modernizing FERPA, innovation is going to be opposed and will stall.”

“Congress needs to protect all student information, not just things that were considered educational records in 1974. And lastly, the privacy protections have to apply to all of the participates in the educational environment, which means the schools, the vendors, the parents, the entire educational community set of actors have to be covered by these protections.”

February 6, 2015

Weekly Wrapup: Net Neutrality, President’s Budget Request and That DeLorean on the Hill

The big news this week, of course, was Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler’s unveiling of his proposal for net neutrality rules. Technocrat’s posts this week included that big topic as well as President Barack Obama‘s fiscal 2016 budget request, why you might have seen a DeLorean around the Hill, and more.

Wheeler Announces Net Neutrality Proposal

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler says he’ll circulate to fellow commissioners this week a proposal for net neutrality rules that would treat Internet providers as common carriers, using Title II of the 1934 Communications Act, the same portion of law the agency uses to regulate phone companies and other common carriers.

Q&A: AAAS’ Matt Hourihan

President Barack Obama recently released his budget proposal for fiscal year 2016, and Technocrat chatted with Matt Hourihan of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences about some science and research issues proposed in previous budgets that have and haven’t been embraced by lawmakers.

Obama’s Budget on Cybersecurity, Digital Service Teams and Commercial Crew:

Here’s a look at some of the Obama administration’s fiscal 2016 budget proposal to Congress on the issues of cybersecurity, digital service teams and NASA’s commercial crew program…

What Was The Deal With That DeLorean You Might Have Spotted Today?

You might have spotted a DeLorean around the Hill on Thursday and if you’re wondering why, it’s part of a campaign by Americans for Tax Reform to bring attention to their call for an update to tech laws they say are outdated.

Should Computer Science Be Counted as a Foreign Language Class?

Some states have been proposing or advancing legislation to let computer science classes be counted as a foreign language either to meet high school graduation or college admissions requirements. You can add Washington to the list of states looking at this matter.


Should Computer Science Be Counted as a Foreign Language Class?

Some states have been proposing or advancing legislation to let computer science classes be counted as a foreign language either to meet high school graduation or college admissions requirements. You can add Washington to the list of states looking at this matter.

KPLU reported earlier this week about a state lawmaker who “says prospective college students should have the option to skip Spanish or Chinese and take two years of computer science instead” to meet foreign language requirements for college admissions, contending that funding for foreign language could be better spent.

KPLU describes legislation that the state lawmaker Chris Reykdal has proposed:

Reykdal is one of the main sponsors of a bill that would start a conversation: Should colleges and universities in Washington State require the study of a foreign language in high school? Should students have the option of swapping language out for computer science?

The bill, which had a hearing this week, asks the Office Of Public Instruction and the state’s colleges and universities to get together and talk about this. They’d have to report back to lawmakers by Nov. 1, 2017.

The issue of letting computer science meet foreign language requirements has been taken up in other states as well. It looks like, a Seattle-based nonprofit that seeks to expand computer science education, isn’t too keen on the idea.

For more on the issue, check out this Education Week story from last year:

In January, Texas lawmakers approved legislation that would allow students to take a computer science course to satisfy a foreign-language requirement—a move that alarmed some computing advocates, who say it denies computer science’s deep roots in math and science. Several other states, including Kentucky and New Mexico, are considering a similar approach.

January 8, 2015

Cell Phones in New York City Schools: Cottage Industry and Students

New York City’s mayor and schools chancellor recently announced a policy change that would lift a ban on students bringing cell phones to public schools, and The New York Times takes a closer look at the cottage industry that emerged to keep watch over students’ phones for a fee, and what the policy change means for those businesses.

Elizabeth A. Harris and Nate Schweber write in their story:

Students, as one might imagine, were thrilled, but for the small cottage industry of trucks that babysat for the banished phones, the announcement meant it would soon be time to pack up and drive away for good.

WYNC’s Yasmeen Khan’s piece mentions what some students think their schools should do: “While many students cheered the mayor’s announcement on Wednesday to lift the ban on cell phones in schools, there were plenty of others — or sometimes the same students — who questioned the wisdom of permitting access to the devices.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Leslie Brody and Sonja Sharp write: “New York City students welcomed Wednesday’s announcement of the demise of a long-standing ban on cellphones in schools—while admitting many had ignored the rules anyway.”

By Anne L. Kim Posted at 2:04 p.m.

December 12, 2014

Weekly Wrapup: E-Rate Funding Cap Increase, Internet Tax Moratorium and IP Nominees

Among the happenings this week: the Federal Communications Commission increased the funding cap on the E-Rate program, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on intellectual property nominees, and the spending package to fund the federal government includes provisions such as an extension of the Internet tax moratorium.

  • The House passed a spending package to fund the federal government that includes an extension of the Internet tax moratorium through Oct. 1, 2015. It also includes a provision that would block the National Telecommunications and Information Administration from relinquishing its responsibilities over Internet domain names and other domain functions. The NTIA wants to shift those duties to organizations with a stake in the Internet, but Republicans have opposed the change. The Senate’s now considering the package.
  • The Federal Communications Commission approved a measure that would raise by $1.5 billion the funding cap for the E-Rate program that helps schools and libraries pay for Internet access. And since the program’s supported by Universal Service Fund fees, consumers will see up to $1.90 in additional fees on their phone bills each year.
  • Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, who is expected to be the next chairman of the Judiciary Committee, made clear that the nominations of Michelle K. Lee to be director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and Daniel H. Marti to be the White House’s intellectual property enforcement coordinator, wouldn’t advance in the 113th Congress, since there wasn’t enough time. But he also indicated that the nominations might be acted on early in the next Congress.
  • Technocrat had a Q&A with University of North Carolina law professor William P. Marshall about the Supreme Court case involving violent comments made on Facebook. You can find Part 1 here and Part 2 here.
  • The Telecommunications Industry Association organized a letter to FCC commissioners and House and Senate leaders opposing proposals to reclassify broadband as a common carrier as part of the FCC’s rewrite of net neutrality rules. Sixty companies signed on including IBM, Panasonic, Qualcomm, Cisco, and dLink.
  • BSA | The Software Alliance released a survey of roughly 1,500 business owners and decision makers in the U.S. and Europe on data analytics and among its U.S. findings: While 33 percent thought more than 10 percent of their company’s growth will be related to data analytics this year, 58 percent thought the same looking five years from now.

December 11, 2014

FCC Approves $1.5 Billion E-Rate Funding Cap Increase

The Federal Communications Commission approved a measure Thursday that will raise by $1.5 billion the funding cap for a program, known as E-Rate, that helps schools and libraries pay for Internet access. And since the program’s paid for through Universal  Service Fund fees consumers see on their telephone bills, that will translate to up to $1.90 in additional fees on your phone bill each year.

CQ Roll Call’s Carolyn Phenicie reports that commissioners approved the measure in a party line vote of 3-2.

The measure raises the program’s funding cap from $2.4 billion to $3.9 billion.

Phenicie reports (subscription):

The order also makes a few other changes, including allowing schools and libraries to pay large upfront construction costs over multiple years, permitting program applicants to build high-speed broadband facilities themselves when doing so would be cost-effective and matching state support for “last-mile” broadband with up to 10 percent of construction costs.

As background, Phenicie writes that the “proposals come on the heels of changes made this summer to phase-out funding for outdated technology such as pagers and allow more funding to be put toward the physical connections needed to expand wireless connections.”

According to Phenicie, net neutrality protesters interrupted the meeting several times, including by a pair of protesters who ran behind the commissioners holding a banner that said “reclassify now,” referring to calls for the agency to reclassify broadband as a common carrier in rewriting net neutrality rules:

“This is what the presidents wants, this is what the people want. We deserve to have the net kept neutral,” they said. They also apologized for interrupting the meeting. Chairman Tom Wheeler addressed a group of students in the audience, “You’ve just seen the First Amendment at work. This is what this country is all about.”

December 8, 2014

The Week Ahead: Human Space Flight, the Sharing Economy and Surveillance

It could be the last week of the 113th Congress (maybe?) and with the December holidays fast approaching, it promises to be a packed with congressional hearings on intellectual property nominees, drones and human space flight and events on issues from surveillance to the sharing economy.


The Advisory Committee to the Congressional Internet Caucus hosts a panel discussion on the sharing economy.

The Direct Marketing Association and Venable LLP hold an event titled the “The Dynamic State of Data: A Policy Briefing for the Data-Driven Marketing Community.”

The Personal Connected Health Alliance’s mHealth Summit on mobile and connected health continues into the week.


The Atlantic holds a panel event on science, technology, education and math careers.

National Consumers League holds a panel discussion on legislation on data security standards.


The American Enterprise Institute holds an event on surveillance, specifically on “legal intercept.”

The Brookings Institution holds an event on mobile technologies and developing economies.

BSA | The Software Alliance holds a panel discussion on data.

The Computer and Communications Industry Association and The American Antitrust Institute hold an event on patent assertion entities.

A House Science, Space and Technology subcommittee holds a hearing on NASA’s heavy rocket and and crew vehicle.

A House Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee holds a hearing on drones.

The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee holds a cybersecurity hearing.

The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing on the nominations of Michelle K. Lee, to head the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and Daniel H. Marti, to be the White House’s intellectual property enforcement coordinator.


The Federal Communications Commission holds its December open meeting.


The Cato Institute holds a day-long surveillance conference.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies holds a panel discussion on the Internet of Things.

December 4, 2014

Rockefeller Gives Farewell Speech


Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., interviewed by the press before the Senate policy luncheons in the Capitol. ( Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., interviewed by the press before the Senate policy luncheons in the Capitol. ( Chris Maddaloni/CQ Roll Call)

The retiring chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee gave his farewell speech Thursday on the Senate floor and he mentioned a few science and tech-related items including surveillance overhaul legislation and the federal program that discounts phone and Internet service for schools and libraries, known as E-Rate.

In case you missed it, some quotes on tech and science issues from Sen. Jay Rockefeller‘s, D-W.Va., farewell speech are below.

On surveillance overhaul legislation.

He described it as having “reforms necessary to uphold the mission of protecting our nation.”

He said:

Because the global threats we face increase daily as the world becomes more connected, we depend on the highly trained professionals at NSA to zero-in on those threats. There’s really only 22 of them that make sort of final decisions. They’re highly trained. They’ve taken the oath of office to protect our nation.

“Now, I don’t think that we have any excuse to outsource our intelligence works to telecommunications firms,” he said. He added that his work on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation panel showed him what telecommunications companies do “when they think they can get away with it. You know, everything from cramming to just all kinds of not very nice things.”

He said it was the government’s job to address the matter, and that it’s been conducted successfully.

“A lot of people say oh well what if. But the fact of the matter is nobody has ever been able to show me somebody whose privacy has been, you know, influenced or broken into by the NSA,” he said.

On E-Rate (he was among the authors of the program):

“We have worked to give children a fair shot through the E-Rate, a program which introduces even the most rural classrooms and smallest libraries to the world through the Internet.”

On the science and research law known as the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act:

Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (who preceded John Thune on the Commerce Committee) Senator Alexander and I sought unanimous consent to get the bill passed because we thought we’d worked out the details pretty well, and do it prior to the recess, therefore we had to do it by unanimous consent. But there were five objections holding the bill still. Instead of retreating to party corners and pointing fingers we compromised right on that center aisle…. And we had ourselves a $44 billion bill over five years on which we agreed. We didn’t have to have a vote. Sen Hutchison, Senator Alexamder tenaciously worked to clear the holds. It was, Madam President, absolutely beautiful. It was just beautiful.”

Rockefeller was greeted with handshakes and hugs from fellow senators after his speech.

December 1, 2014

The Week Ahead: Cybercrime, Telecommunications Law and the Internet of Things

I hope you had your rest and relaxation over the Thanksgiving holiday because things are kicking into gear again, with events on cybercrime, telecommunications law and the Internet of Things.


The Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies holds an event on patent regulation and policy.

New America hosts talk with Shane Harris, author of “@War: The Rise of the Military-Internet Complex.”

New York University’s Information Law Institute and Microsoft’s Innovation & Policy center host an event titled “Building Privacy Into Data-Driven Education.”

The Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic  Public Policy Studies holds its U.S. Telecoms Symposium.

The Planetary Society holds an event on the future of solar system exploration.


The Bipartisan Policy Center holds an event on health information technology.

The Cato Institute hosts a talk with Terence Kealey, vice-chancellor emeritus at the University of Buckingham, on public funding of science and research.

The House Oversight & Government Reform Committee holds a hearing on the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act.

The Information Technology Industry Council and Intel host an event on technology, policy and emerging health crises.


Georgetown University Law Center and the Justice Department’s Criminal Division sponsor an event titled “Cybercrime 2020: The Future of Online Crime and Investigations.”

The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation’s Center for Data Innovation holds an event on the Internet of Things.

Republic 3.0 hosts a panel discussion on progressives and a rewrite of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...