Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 28, 2015

Abortion Dilemma in ‘Nuclear Option’ Debate

Pearl opposed the "nuclear option" as Planned Parenthood's interim president in 2005. (Scott J. Ferrell/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Pearl opposed the “nuclear option” as Planned Parenthood’s interim president in 2005. (Scott J. Ferrell/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Updated 6:24 p.m. | Outside advocates of abortion rights have largely steered clear of public involvement in the latest round of ratcheting up of “nuclear option” talk in the Senate, and there might be good reason for that.

The dilemma for groups like Planned Parenthood is clear: Back the nuclear option for victories on issues like birth control now, and you’ll increase the risk that a Republican president will be able to put hostile nominees on the bench in the future.

Planned Parenthood was among the liberal groups most active against the 2005 effort by the Senate’s Republican majority at the time to get President George W. Bush’s federal appellate nominees confirmed to the bench with simple majority votes — a point still clear on the organization’s website.

A May 2005 news release remains among the top Google search results for Planned Parenthood’s views on changing the Senate’s procedures with respect to judicial nominations with a simple majority vote. The release includes statements from Karen Pearl, the interim president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 2005.

“We are proud that our activists are telling their senators loud and clear that they oppose this attempt to silence minority voices,” Pearl said. “Supporters of the ‘nuclear option’ are only proving that they prefer intimidation and power politics to rational and honest debate, and America will suffer as a result.”

Given weeks to respond, Planned Parenthood did not provide a comment for this report, but some Senate supporters of changing the chamber’s practice on judicial nominations have told CQ Roll Call they suspect that pro-choice groups are working behind the scenes against the effort.

The concern would be that once the rules are changed, a future GOP-led Senate would use the process to confirm judges openly hostile to the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision that has guaranteed abortion rights.

The 2005 Planned Parenthood release criticized the Bush nominations of Janice Rogers Brown and Priscilla Owen. Both were confirmed to federal appeals court vacancies as a result of the “gang of 14″ deal that averted the use of the nuclear option in exchange for a number of senators agreeing not to filibuster judicial nominees except under “extraordinary circumstances.”

Brown’s name resurfaced in the nuclear option conversation in recent weeks because of a Nov. 1 opinion she authored against the contraceptive mandate contained in the health care overhaul law.

Senators and liberal observers who believe that the time has come to change the cloture rule for judicial nominations say that the decision by Brown and others like it underscore that Obama needs to be able to get more of his nominees confirmed, notwithstanding Republican threats about future conservative judges, like those of Judiciary ranking member Charles E. Grassley of Iowa.

“If the Democrats are bent on changing the rules. Go ahead. There are a lot more Scalias and Thomases out there we’d love to put on the bench,” Grassley said.

One Senate Democratic aide said Republicans have already blocked three women for the D.C. Circuit alone — Caitlin Halligan, Patricia Ann Millett and Nina Pillard. “Earlier this month we saw the DC Circuit Court rule that CEOs should be able to deny workers birth control coverage based on their own personal beliefs. It is clear that if we do nothing, our courts will continue to threaten women’s access to health care,” the aide said.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is viewed by many as the most important court short of the Supreme Court itself. All three female nominees faced procedural blockades because of Republican filibusters.

Democratic supporters of the effort to change the rules, led by Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Tom Udall of New Mexico, were quick to respond to the vote to block the Pillard nomination.

And Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., responded to the votes in a floor speech last week, arguing that Republicans were seeking to nullify the outcome of the 2012 presidential election when it comes to Obama’s power to nominate judges.

“If Republicans continue to filibuster these highly qualified nominees for no reason other than to nullify the president’s constitutional authority, then senators not only have a right to change the filibuster rules — senators have a duty to change the filibuster rules. We cannot turn our backs on the Constitution. We cannot abdicate our oath of office,” Warren said. “We have a responsibility to protect and defend our democracy, and that includes protecting the neutrality of our courts — and preserving the constitutional power of the president to nominate highly qualified people to court vacancies.”

With Democrats failing to break a filibuster on the nomination of Robert L. Wilkins to the last seat on that same court Monday evening on a 53-38 vote, decision time looms for Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and his caucus.

Comments (33)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. unStunned

    Nov. 18, 2013
    5:44 p.m.

    This article nicely illustrates an intractable problem. All parties, once in power, are afraid to forgo the filibuster because they are afraid THEY won’t be able to block opposing parties when they are returned to power. As a result, the United States government is the paralyzed captive of interest groups no matter which party is in power.

    This is an outrage. Most of us in this great land of ours will NEVER be in power so this is irrelevant to us. It’s inside baseball and deprives Americans of the government they pay these chumps to provide.

    Bring on the “nuclear option.” Let the chips fall where they may,but for god’s sake let’s get some work done.

  2. papal

    Nov. 18, 2013
    8:16 p.m.

    Repubs block dems, dems block repubs, it is all good. The repubs might control the next senate and Harry might not be the one that opens up that can of worms

  3. Santiago Alemedia

    Nov. 19, 2013
    6:17 a.m.

    Keep the filibuster, but change the rules to make the objector stand and talk without any breaks until he’s done or collapses. Problem solved. Currently, a senator only has to raise a finger and say “I object,” to put the Senate into filibuster mode.

  4. John W

    Nov. 19, 2013
    9:19 a.m.

    If Senator Warren is so concerned about following the constitution, she should be incensed about the dozens of presidential administrative orders which the courts are busy overthrowing as unconstitutional. We don’t need congress any more – Harry Reid and the President are running the country by themselves.

  5. Gyst53

    Nov. 23, 2013
    8 a.m.

    “Don’t tear down a fence until you know why it was put up.” ~ African
    There have been amendments to the Senate filibuster rules which would lower the passage numbers after cloture votes which would be lowered if still active debate from 60 to 57 next vote then 53 then if another vote a simple majority of 51. Sounds like a good solution to me….

  6. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    1:27 p.m.

    Excellent blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  7. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    9:02 p.m.

    F*ckin’ awesome things here. I am very glad to see your post. Thanks a lot and i am having a look ahead to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?

  8. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    6:20 a.m.

    I envy your piece of work, thankyou for all the informative blog posts.

  9. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    4:33 a.m.

    I gotta bookmark this web site it seems very beneficial very useful

  10. Anonymous

    July 19, 2015
    11:07 a.m.

    I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post…

  11. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    2:20 a.m.

    I got what you mean , regards for posting.Woh I am lucky to find this website through google. “Don’t be afraid of opposition. Remember, a kite rises against not with the wind.” by Hamilton Mabie.

  12. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    3:08 a.m.

    Well I truly liked studying it. This tip procured by you is very effective for accurate planning.

  13. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    8:04 a.m.

    You got a very superb website, Gladiolus I noticed it through yahoo.

  14. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    9:54 p.m.

    Glad to be one of the visitors on this awful site : D.

  15. Anonymous

    July 26, 2015
    12:10 a.m.

    Thank you for sharing superb informations. Your web-site is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this website. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for more articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched everywhere and simply couldn’t come across. What a perfect website.

  16. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    6:36 a.m.

    The very crux of your writing while sounding agreeable originally, did not really sit well with me personally after some time. Someplace within the sentences you actually managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in assumptions and you would do nicely to help fill in those gaps. In the event that you can accomplish that, I could surely end up being fascinated.

  17. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    2:10 p.m.

    Currently it appears like Movable Type is the best blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  18. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    6:04 p.m.

    Simply wanna input that you have a very nice website , I love the pattern it actually stands out.

  19. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    7:58 a.m.

    Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.

  20. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    8:52 a.m.

    Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!

  21. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    3:48 p.m.

    Hello there I am so thrilled I found your blog, I really found you by error, while I was looking on Google for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say cheers for a incredible post and a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look over it all at the moment but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the excellent job.

  22. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    12:26 p.m.

    Keep working ,impressive job!

  23. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    3:12 p.m.

    Howdy! Someone in my Myspace group shared this website with us so I came to look it over. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m book-marking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Great blog and amazing style and design.

  24. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    6:13 a.m.

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So good to search out any person with some unique thoughts on this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this web site is one thing that’s wanted on the net, somebody with a bit originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web!

  25. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    6:43 a.m.

    I have not checked in here for a while because I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are good quality so I guess I will add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

  26. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    9:22 p.m.

    Thanks a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really recognise what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Kindly also visit my web site =). We will have a hyperlink change arrangement between us!

  27. Anonymous

    Aug. 18, 2015
    9:48 p.m.

    Greetings! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!

  28. Anonymous

    Aug. 19, 2015
    5:42 a.m.

    Good day! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a outstanding job!

  29. Anonymous

    Aug. 19, 2015
    6:31 a.m.

    I am not very great with English but I come up this very easy to translate.

  30. Anonymous

    Aug. 19, 2015
    11:28 a.m.

    I will right away seize your rss as I can not in finding your email subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please permit me understand in order that I may subscribe. Thanks.

  31. Anonymous

    Aug. 24, 2015
    3:16 p.m.

    of course like your web site but you have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I will certainly come back again.

  32. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    11:40 p.m.

    Attractive section of content. I simply stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire actually enjoyed account your weblog posts. Any way I will be subscribing for your augment and even I fulfillment you get entry to persistently fast.

  33. Anonymous

    Aug. 26, 2015
    5:04 a.m.

    I’d have to examine with you here. Which is not one thing I usually do! I take pleasure in reading a post that may make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...