Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 31, 2015

Behind the Portman-Reid Immigration Feud

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

When the Senate passed its immigration overhaul Thursday, one amendment lauded by Democrats and Republicans wasn’t in it.

That’s because — as both sides agree — Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, declined to have his proposal to expand the E-Verify system included in the major bipartisan catchall amendment that the Senate crafted last week.

But that’s where the agreement ends and the fight between Portman and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., begins.

Portman desperately wanted a separate vote on an amendment he developed with Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., that would enhance workplace verification of citizenship. But he said the deal to include it, along with a bipartisan border security amendment, in the June 21 substitute amendment came with too many strings attached.

Portman said that including the language in the Corker-Hoeven “border surge” package would have required him to co-sponsor the amendment “sight unseen.” But Reid’s office categorically denies the suggestion that any such communication came from the Democratic side.

“Senator Portman was offered the opportunity to co-sponsor Hoeven-Portman if he so chose. If he declined to co-sponsor, his E-VERIFY changes would still have been included in the bill,” a senior Democratic aide said in an email Wednesday night. “There was no ‘price of admission’ whatsoever.”

Portman responded to Reid’s office Thursday, saying that he offered another idea that’s somewhat deep in the weeds of Senate procedure.

“Do they also dispute that we gave them a pathway forward as a second-degree amendment and gave them the language … [the] parliamentarian having approved it, that they could have offered Portman-Tester as a second amendment without going through UC?” asked Portman. “We would have filled the tree.”

“Filling the tree” is one of the most-frequently deployed devices in the majority leader’s toolbox. In effect, Reid uses his traditional power of first recognition to insert a bunch of dummy amendments and motions that block the offering of further amendments. When he does this, he has the option of putting substantive text in the placeholders, but doing so may infuriate other senators when their amendments remain blocked.

Reid’s office says that granting such treatment to Portman’s plan would have been unrealistic. That’s a point that seems to bear out, considering that earlier in the debate on the immigration measure, Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, D-La., blasted the idea that consensus amendments had to wait in line behind more contentious offerings from senators who had no plan to support the final bill.

Portman stressed that his bipartisan amendment was not like that, and said that without it, he would vote against final passage.

“I think it is in a unique class in that we have all the sign-offs from ‘gang of eight’, White House, AFL-CIO, Chamber of Commerce, I mean we did our work over the last six weeks, and it strengthens the bill,” he said.

New York Democratic Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a member of the gang of eight that negotiated the underlying measure on Wednesday countered Portman’s argument that his language was imperative.

“I have heard my good friend from Ohio, and I like his amendment. In fact, my staff worked on it with him. But let’s make no mistake about it. This is a vast bill, and E-Verify — permanent E-Verify — is in the bill. Maybe it can be improved a little bit, but it is 0.01 percent of the bill,” Schumer said. “It does not deal with border security. It does not deal with entry-exit. It does not deal with the 11 million. It does not deal with future flow.

“Of course, we want this amendment offered, and many of us will support it. But to say that is the only reason — if it does not get in the bill it is not worth voting for — I would have to respectfully and completely disagree with my colleague,” he added.

On Thursday, Portman reiterated his belief that simply packaging his language into an omnibus amendment wouldn’t give it significant clout in potential House-Senate negotiations.

“In the conference committee, you want to be able to say, you know what, we really need to get tough on the workplace, as hard as it is politically,” Portman said, explaining that there could be more leverage in conference if there’s an overwhelming standalone vote. “I think we could get not just 76 votes on E-Verify, I think we could get closer to 80 or 90.

“I don’t think it would, it would send the message that needs to be sent,” as part of the omnibus amendment, said Portman.

Comments (20)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    7:15 p.m.

    I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I have incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my site :).

    http://www.furtdsolinopv.com/

  2. Anonymous

    July 6, 2015
    6:40 p.m.

    Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic blog!

    http://topcheapinsurance.com/homeowners-insurance.html

  3. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    4:55 p.m.

    I dugg some of you post as I cogitated they were very useful invaluable

  4. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:20 p.m.

    You could definitely see your expertise in the paintings you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to say how they believe. Always follow your heart. “Man is the measure of all things.” by Protagoras.

    https://www.zotero.org/errolloei60

  5. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    8:34 a.m.

    Some really nice and useful info on this internet site, as well I believe the style has got wonderful features.

    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/Infoasistencia

  6. Anonymous

    July 11, 2015
    8:47 a.m.

    I’m still learning from you, as I’m making my way to the top as well. I definitely liked reading everything that is posted on your website.Keep the stories coming. I liked it!

    http://www.sssmep.cz/new/wadmin/index.php?title=How_To_Find_Cheap_Homeowners_Insurance

  7. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    3:11 p.m.

    Heya i’m for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me.

    http://homeownersinsurancem.com/amica-car-and-home-insurance.html

  8. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    3:46 p.m.

    I intended to draft you that very small word to say thanks a lot once again regarding the gorgeous tactics you have documented above. It was really open-handed with you to supply unhampered what exactly many of us could possibly have made available for an e book to help with making some bucks on their own, chiefly considering the fact that you could have tried it in case you considered necessary. The basics as well served to be a great way to know that other individuals have similar passion the same as my personal own to find out lots more with reference to this condition. I’m sure there are lots of more pleasurable moments ahead for individuals that take a look at your blog.

    http://homeownersinsurancem.com/amica-car-and-home-insurance.html

  9. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    8:08 p.m.

    Its excellent as your other blog posts : D, thanks for posting.

    http://www.wat.tv/video/salon-massage-naturiste-massage-79q5z_79q5x_.html

  10. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    11:08 p.m.

    Thanks for your marvelous posting! I quite enjoyed reading it, you happen to be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and may come back in the future. I want to encourage one to continue your great writing, have a nice holiday weekend!

    http://vimeo.com/126527913

  11. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    5:52 a.m.

    What i don’t understood is in reality how you are not actually much more well-liked than you may be right now. You are very intelligent. You recognize therefore significantly in relation to this subject, produced me in my view imagine it from a lot of various angles. Its like women and men are not involved except it’s something to do with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs outstanding. All the time take care of it up!

    https://musicbrainz.org/user/tail8honey

  12. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    1:36 p.m.

    Some truly choice content on this web site, saved to my bookmarks.

    http://brookereviews.com/product/stdcheck-com-review/

  13. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    8:58 p.m.

    You actually make it appear so easy together with your presentation but I in finding this topic to be actually something which I feel I would by no means understand. It kind of feels too complicated and very vast for me. I’m having a look forward to your subsequent post, I will attempt to get the hang of it!

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org/auto-insurance-quotes-without-personal-information.html

  14. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    5:09 a.m.

    Real wonderful information can be found on web blog.

    http://lowcostautoquotes.com/home-insurance.html

  15. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    6:33 a.m.

    My wife and i felt now delighted Louis could complete his research while using the ideas he obtained from your web page. It is now and again perplexing to just be giving freely key points that some people have been trying to sell. And we also grasp we have got the blog owner to be grateful to for this. All the explanations you have made, the straightforward site navigation, the relationships you can make it possible to instill – it is most amazing, and it is letting our son in addition to us consider that this subject is entertaining, and that is exceedingly mandatory. Thank you for the whole thing!

    http://split.us

  16. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:32 a.m.

    I am often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.

    http://bathmatehydromax-x30.weebly.com/blog/rahsia-besarkan-zakar

  17. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    8:13 a.m.

    Great site. A lot of useful information here. I¦m sending it to a few pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you on your effort!

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  18. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    9:35 p.m.

    certainly like your web-site but you have to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I’ll certainly come back again.

    http://www.projectwedding.com/blog_entries/343911

  19. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    3:17 p.m.

    Wonderful post however I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this subject? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit more. Cheers!

    http://www.warriorforum.com/showthread.php?t=1094532

  20. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    1:07 p.m.

    I like the valuable info you provide on your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and test again right here frequently. I am reasonably certain I will be told lots of new stuff proper here! Good luck for the next!

    http://eblogtip.com/interserver-vps-hosting-shared-hosting-and-dedicated-server-review-cheap-unlimited-web-hosting-only-4-95-per-month/

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...