Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
May 30, 2015

Cornyn Presses Holder on Gun Tracking

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn is asking Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. about the possibility of the Obama administration trying to track gun owners. The Texas Republican’s letter puts the Justice Department on the spot following Holder’s testimony about new gun safety devices at an April 4 House subcommittee hearing about the department’s fiscal 2015 budget.

“Would the technological capabilities you referenced in your testimony require, or allow for, the monitoring of American citizens’ personally identifying information through a central database or registry?” Cornyn asked in his Tuesday letter.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon responded to that contention with an emailed statement.

“We will review the senator’s letter. For over a year, the administration has been working with firearm manufacturers to promote technologies developed by the private sector that could improve firearm safety,” Fallon said. “Any suggestion that the Attorney General called for physically tracking law-abiding gun owners is a dishonest distortion.”

Cornyn asked a series of other questions about Holder’s Commerce-Justice-Science subpanel of the House Appropriations Committee testimony, including a query about possible executive actions related to firearms.

Cornyn specifically asked Holder for assurances that there will not be new requirements for fingerprint or biometric technology for guns.

A copy of the letter from Cornyn to Holder is available here (PDF).

  • TexTopCat

    “Cornyn specifically asked Holder for assurances that there will not be new requirements for fingerprint or biometric technology for guns.” – The right question however, not sure that any answer from Holder is worth much.

    • Zach

      Nah, not a great question. Unless you’re interested in advancing the myth that gun rights are under siege. In which case it’s terrific.

      • TexTopCat

        It is not a myth when it is truth. No sane person could possibly believe that gun rights are not under siege. Just listen to the extreme restrictions supported by this president, vice-president and AG. When people like Bloomberg spend $50m to punish elected officials that support the Bill of Rights, what else could be the case?

        • Zach

          Let’s be clear here: Your rights are not under siege because 90% of Americans (including 3/4 of NRA members) want universal background checks. Your rights aren’t even under siege because a majority would support an assault weapons ban.

          You’ve just been led to believe they are by people who want to sell more guns.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...