Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
October 26, 2014

Democrats Eye ‘Nuclear Option’ Redux

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid raised the specter of another “nuclear” rules confrontation with the GOP if Republicans don’t stop their delaying tactics on nominations.

“I’m not interested in changing the rules now. But now is a relative term,” the Nevada Democrat told reporters Tuesday.

A senior Senate Democratic aide said Democrats would “very seriously consider” changes if they retain the majority, including using the “nuclear option” to change the rules on a simple majority vote. Senate rules require a two-thirds majority to change the rules, but Democrats pushed through a rules change last year eliminating the 60-vote threshold for all nominations except those for the Supreme Court. They did so by overturning the ruling of the chairman with a simple majority vote.

Republicans warned that if Democrats tighten their grip on the rules, it would deepen the divide between the parties and change the character of an institution often billed as the world’s greatest deliberative body.

“I think that’d be very unfortunate,” Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said. Collins said the rules change last year “poisoned the well in the Senate and I cannot imagine wanting to worsen this.”

She suggested instead that Reid restore the 60-vote rule for cloture on nominations.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said the previous change was unjustified and subsequent changes would be ill-advised.

“This is a power play,” Graham said. “And if he wants to continue to do this I think he will hurt the Senate and I hope Democrats on their side will understand what this means.”

Reid and his fellow Democrats detonated the nuclear option last year to prevent the minority from filibustering executive and most judicial nominations. That change came after a series of floor speeches building a record of what Reid said was GOP obstruction.

But Democrats kept the cloture process in place — allowing Republicans to chew up time on votes for nominees and on post-cloture time, which can last up to 30 hours per nomination.

Republicans have retaliated by frequently forcing the Senate to burn up the time allotted, even though in many cases the nominees aren’t controversial.

“Republicans are pouting,” Reid said on the floor Tuesday. “They are saying, ‘Aw, they changed the rules to get these judges done so we are going to agree to nothing,’ and they have agreed to nothing, [including] things we used to do just as a matter of fact.”

Reid argued that the Republican obstruction is a political tactic designed to deny Democrats and the President Barack Obama any semblance of a victory.

And Democrats say frustration is growing within the caucus, though there have been no formal discussions yet on changing the rules.

“I understood that there was going to be a hangover from our change on nominations, but I think the Republicans are pressing the patience of those of us who understood that things are going to rocky for a little while,” said Sen. Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn. who has supported changing the Senate rules since before being elected in 2012.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said he believes there are more Democrats who back taking action on the filibuster than ever before.

“I do,” Blumenthal said. “And I think the number is growing, and we will probably have some new members [after the midterm elections] that feel as I do that they were sent here to accomplish something.”

The Democratic aide said it was too early to say how they would alter Senate procedure, but the one likely target is requiring post-cloture time to be used for debate or be forfeited.

“It’s called debate time for a reason,” the aide said. “It’s supposed to be used for debate, not to run out the time arbitrarily. Republicans are making a good case for use it or lose it.”

Murphy agreed that the next action would likely be something incremental on post-cloture time, but noted there could be an appetite for something more significant, such as the proposal put forward by Democratic Sens. Tom Udall of New Mexico and Jeff Merkley of Oregon that would have eliminated the ability to filibuster a motion to proceed to legislation and would have required opponents of action to debate the issue on the floor.

Merkley said he expects to bring up his proposal at the beginning of the next session.

“I will do everything I can come January to try to make the Senate work more effectively,” Merkley said. “We need to have a process whereby we can actually get bills on the floor and debate them.”

The Democratic aide said the outcome could depend on how obstructionist the GOP remains the rest of the year.

“The best thing Republicans can do, from a pro-reform perspective, is keep doing what they have been doing,” the aide said.

Niels Lesniewski and Bridget Bowman contributed to this report.

  • Jazzy

    I think the same person doing the VA stats is doing the unemployment stats also. The fact that Obama is playing blame game with Boehner over EUC shows how bad BOTH parties are.

  • Jazzy

    But, hey Obama/House, on behalf of the American people, thanks for getting the Height Bill through and signed so quick. God only knows how important it is that we get those penthouse built right away -that’s your idea of job creation, huh? Obama those construction workers you took to lunch, are they building those penthouses? How about feeding the 3 million Americans who you cut off?

  • left wing

    dems just ignore or violate any rules or laws they feel like. why should we have a government, if it can not abide by the laws and rules it passed? time for everyone to just pick the laws they like and ignore all the rest. after all if the liar in chief and his gangsters can do it, why not everyone else?

  • EWS

    Rethugs use obstruction as nullification considering the Rethug party is now a Neo Confederate Southern White party. They have done nothing but heap shame
    on themselves in their refusal to accept two elections where Obama handily beat them. They cannot accept a black man as president, especially one as accomplished and smart as Obama. He has no choice but to use his very constitutional powers of the presidency to try and push policies at the margins. It is a shame this minority who 70-80% of America does not agree with can hold up policies they all support. A reckoning is coming for them. Just look at CA today with democratic super majorities driven by the hispanic vote. Just as the Neo Confederate party hates minorities, their cry of no amnesty will doom them to the regional white supremacist status they deserve. 2016 will be just the beginning as
    the tide washes them away!!

    • darthgidget

      Reid has obstructed more than the Republicans have. I say get rid of all obstruction- not just the obstruction you don’t like.

      • EWS

        Then you are either willfully ignorant of the situation or a partisan. Look up the use of the fillibuster by the minority since Obama took over? It is higher than any president by a mile. Oh, and when the Republicans had the majority, how many amendment votes did they allow Democrats??

  • darthgidget

    give the majority to the Republicans and see how the democrats respond. democrats are trying to save their majority through these obviously political attacks but Reid has been holding bills passed by the House on his desk. If you actually want to change the rules to make it fair and deliberative, require that all bills passed by the House are presented to the full Senate within 30 days. Up or down vote. That’s what the democrats keep drying about. Let’s require it- up or down vote on everything. Take the power about what bills will be presented away from the Majority leader and give it to the full Senate to decide. The democrats can still vote down every bill that the House passed.

    • EWS

      Yeah really. Maybe you should look at the last time the Republicans had the majority and how many amendment votes they allowed the dems. Perhaps the minority should show a little respect to the process and not require 60 votes on every measure as have been doing. Sorry but your attempt at equivocation is a poor one based on the facts. Dems are not angels but they have NEVER practiced the level of obstruction the Republicans have since 2008. The fact is the Republicans blew up the comity of the senate, not the Dems.

      • ErichVonZipper

        The fact is that the Democrats blew up the comity of the Senate long before 2008, when they went back on their agreements in the 1980′s to create new laws dealing with the illegal immigration problem.

  • Manny G

    Easy way to make money that is working for me, do a search for “Traders Superstore “its swing trading the oil market and it really works.

  • Firey Hooks

    One thing I’ve noticed recently – Bolshevik ideologues love the word “reform”. It might actually be their favorite word.

  • Oscar’s Wilde

    In this YouTube video, the Memphis Trotsky – Steve Cohen – attacks Christians while waging ideological warfare against the Bill of Rights: http://youtu.be/1WcM3P-Gmh8?t=28s

  • Charlene Weshley

    In related video, Trey Gowdy calls out delusional lunatic Nancy Peolosi for being “mind numbingly” stupid: http://youtu.be/S9CiTTVLh3g

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...