Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
November 27, 2015

Senate’s Syria Resolution Sets Time Limits, Won’t Authorize Ground Troops (Updated)

Updated 9:10 p.m. | Senate Foreign Relations Committee leaders have reached an agreement on the language for the resolution authorizing the use of force against Syria for up to 90 days — but with no “boots on the ground.”

“Sharing President Obama’s view that our nation is best served when we come together as one, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has crafted a bipartisan Authorization for the Use of Military Force that we believe reflects the will and concerns of Democrats and Republicans alike,” Chairman Robert Menendez said Tuesday in a statement. “Together we have pursued a course of action that gives the President the authority he needs to deploy force in response to the Assad regime’s criminal use of chemical weapons against the Syrian people, while assuring that the authorization is narrow and focused, limited in time, and assures that the Armed Forces of the United States will not be deployed for combat operations in Syria.”

The New Jersey Democrat scheduled a markup for Wednesday. Earlier Tuesday, Menendez noted that the new resolution would not permit American boots on the ground.

As drafted, the language worked out between Menendez and ranking member Bob Corker, R-Tenn., would authorize the use of force for 60 days, with provisions making it possible that the authorization would be extended for 30 days after that, according to Senate sources.

While the Senate has authorization language to debate, that’s not yet the case in the House.

With the House and Senate expected to set deadlines for authorization votes by the end of next week, House leaders wouldn’t have much time to draft and approve their own rewrites, especially given the diverse and often free-wheeling membership of the House Foreign Affairs Committee that could result in a marathon markup should that panel be given jurisdiction over the matter.

Following a lengthy Senate hearing on the request to use force against the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, Corker told reporters that House leaders had not yet been brought into conversations about drafting the resolution on the Senate side.

“With the time frame that we’re looking at, it would be very difficult to be bringing in a lot of outside parties,” Corker said. “They’re going to have to address it in their own way.”

A senior House Democratic aide told CQ Roll Call that, throughout Tuesday, members of House leadership on both sides of the aisle had raised questions about what the implications would be if the clock ran out and the only viable resolution text came from the Senate. That aide suggested that many lawmakers thought being forced to take the Senate draft it could be a logistical blessing, averting the potential for an ugly partisan fight.

Speaker John A. Boehner’s spokesman, Michael Steel, offered little insight other than to say, “The House certainly agrees with the Senate that the White House draft is inadequate.”

A House Republican leadership aide, however, seemed to quell speculation that the House GOP would be willing to forgo offering any input, saying, “House Republicans will vote on a resolution once we sufficiently feel it represents the will of our chamber and that will require significant input from our chairmen and members.”

When Secretary of State John Kerry testified before the Senate on Tuesday that he didn’t “want to take off the table” the possibility of American boots on the ground in Syria, the response underscored the difficulty in crafting acceptable legislative language.

Social media erupted when Kerry made the comment in response to a question from Menendez that under some hypothetical situations U.S. forces might end up deployed “in the event Syria imploded, for instance.”

After Corker and Democratic Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin of Maryland each signaled an unease with Kerry’s remarks on that subject, Kerry clarified, saying that he would shut the door to that as part of the authorization now under debate.

Cardin noted the breadth of the original draft that was sent to Capitol Hill on Aug. 31, adding that Obama could always return to seek an expanded authorization.

“The president as commander-in-chief has the authority — the inherent authority — to act in urgent situations when time requires that action,” Cardin said. “I just [want] to urge you in the strongest possible terms to work with our leadership to draft a resolution that is as tight as we can make it to allow you to carry out the mission that you have defined here today.”

“I don’t want anybody misinterpreting this from earlier: This authorization does not contemplate, and should not have any allowance for any troop on the ground, I just want to make that absolutely clear,” Kerry said. “What I was doing was hypothesizing about a potential that might occur at some point in this time, but not in authorization.”

“There’s no problem in our having the language that has zero capacity for American troops on the ground within the authorization the president is asking for. I don’t want anybody in the media or elsewhere to misinterpret that,” Kerry added.

Kerry found himself facing questions about the scope of the authorization in no small part because the original draft was overly broad. Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., was among those raising questions about why the legislative proposal was drafted in that fashion, asking specifically why the draft seems to conflict with numerous public statements by Kerry and others in the Obama administration.

The way the exchange with Udall developed, Kerry did not have an opportunity to answer that question.

  • onecause

    So they say no boots on the ground . Now the enemy will force them to prove that red lie as well
    Foolish to say, we go to war only a little bit , the enemy will not say the same thing .

  • Dean Jackson

    Have you noticed that Washington, DC refuses to wage illegal wars against China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos and Burma, all nations that persecute their populations in one way or another. Only Muslim nations are invaded. Why would that be? Why is the United States funding the so-called “Arab Spring” movements, but not “Communist Spring” movements in China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos and Burma (Burma is also a Communist nation; in fact, the fake dissident Aung San Suu Kyi’s father founded the Burmese Communist Party in 1939, becoming its first General Secretary, which is why Aung San Suu Kyi keeps her silence as Burmese Muslims are being slaughtered. Didn’t know those facts, huh?)?

    Notice too how the Republican Party House leadership (Boehner and Cantor) have come out to inexplicably (again) support Obama’s strange “War on Islam”? This time on Syria. Why would that be? And why are both political parties supporting “rebels” who, when they take power, immediately start persecuting Christians?

    Here’s the answer for those of you who’ve been asleep…

    Firstly, here’s a quote oftentimes attributed to Nikita Kruschev:

    “We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism, until they suddenly awake to find they have communism.”

    Well, take a look at the following, and you’ll be shocked (if Nikita Kruschev didn’t utter the quote above, we know he and his comrades would have known it to be true)…

    Google: ‘Photos: Antonov An-12BK-PPS Aircraft Pictures | Airliners net’


    Google: ‘MiG-23UB Share this photo on forums’

    Then for Russian Naval vessels (take a look at what’s still appended to the bows)…

    Google (enlarge picture): ‘Russia seeks sea power with decrepit fleet Base expansion likely an empty threat’

    Those pictures were taken in 2009, 2011 and 2001, respectively, not before the “collapse” of the USSR. As you can see, the Soviet era nationality emblem of the Communist Party…the Red Star… is still present. That political symbol of the Soviet government would have been immediately removed in early 1992 if the “collapse” of the USSR were genuine. As the legal emblem of the USSR and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the Red Star emblem can only be present if Communists are still in power in Russia and the other 14 republics that made up the USSR.

    Now, for the main paper of the Russian Ministry of Defense…

    Google: ‘Krasnaya Zvezda’

    “Krasnaya Zvezda” is Russian (no kidding!) for “Red Star”, the official newspaper of Soviet and later Russian Ministry of Defense. The paper’s official designation is, “Central Organ of the Russian Ministry of Defense.” Note the four Soviet emblems next to the still existing Soviet era masthead, one of which pictures Lenin’s head!

    It is Moscow and allies who’ve been tasking Washington, DC’s inexplicable foreign policy since before and after 9/11 (including the 9/11 operation itself). Why? To create enmity between Islam and the West, because while the USSR feigns its “collapse”, it is forced to operate in a more or less “liberalized”, and therefore weakened, fashion. Soon too the Chinese Communist government will follow the USSR and fake its collapse.

    You see, before the USSR could implement its fraudulent collapse Western political parties had to be co-opted. And after the “collapse”, Moscow & allies had to ensure enmity between Islam and the West, for fear that Muslim elements within the “former” USSR, with the support of the non-co-opted Western military establishments, would rise up and overthrow their Communist oppressors.

    The fraudulent “collapse” of the USSR (and East Bloc) couldn’t have been pulled off until both political parties in the United States (and political parties elsewhere in the West) were co-opted by Moscow & Allies, which explains why verification of the “collapse” was never undertaken by the West, such verification being (1) a natural administrative procedure (since the USSR wasn’t occupied by Western military forces); and (2) necessary for the survival of the West. Recall President Reagan’s favorite phrase, “Trust, but verify”.

    Now you know why the hated Communist Red Star is still placed on the bows of NEW Russian Naval vessels (and the wings of Russian military aircraft), and why the “electorates” of the 15 republics that made up the USSR continue to “elect” for President Soviet era Communist Party Quislings. There have been 52 such Presidential “elections” since the “collapse” of the USSR, resulting in 40 Soviet era Communist Party member Quislings being elected. That’s 76.92%! If the “collapse” of the USSR were legitimate not one such Quisling would have been elected President. In fact, such persons would have been either arrested in the interests of national security or shunned by society. Remember, Communist Party members made up no more than 10% of the USSR, and it was they who for 74 years persecuted the remaining 90% of the population.

    Now you also know why immediately after the “collapse” of the USSR the United States wasn’t given Russia’s strategic nuclear weapons, including delivery vehicles, for safe keeping! Imagine that, the freed Russian people not ensuring their freedom against a Communist counter-coup with the assistance of Chinese PLA ground and air forces backing up Soviet Special Forces and Airborne Guards. If the “collapse” of the USSR had been real, then a freed Russia, for national security reasons, would have ensured that its nuclear weaponry was secured by United States military elements. That no such actions were taken proves that (1) both American political parties were co-opted by Moscow & Allies; and (2) the United States Armed Forces were not co-opted, otherwise elements of America’s armed forces would have been deployed to Russia in order to pretend to safeguard Russia’s nuclear weapons.

    In addition, the KGB agent Quislings that controlled the Russian Orthodox Church before the “collapse” of the USSR are to this day still in control! They were never identified and thrown out of that institution after the “collapse” of the USSR! The same is true for the other 14 republics of the USSR, including East Bloc nations.

    Regarding the “War on Terror”, Moscow and Beijing tasked the American operation to ensure that while the USSR was in a “liberalized” and therefore weakened state, such a war would (1) create enmity between Islam and the West; thereby (2) aborting any possibility for an alliance between Islam and the West against their mutual and true enemy…World Communism; and (3) create the image that the United States is a rogue state, invading/attacking nations with impunity, thereby setting the stage for a future “democratic” China replacing United States preeminence on the world stage.

    For those unfamiliar with this subject, the “collapse” of the USSR in 1991 was a strategic ruse under the “Long-Range Policy” (LRP). What is the LRP, you ask? The LRP is the “new” strategy all Communist nations signed onto in 1960 to defeat the West with. The last major disinformation operation under the LRP was the “collapse” of the USSR in 1991. The next major disinformation operation under the LRP will be the fraudulent collapse of the Chinese Communist government. When that occurs, Taiwan will be stymied from not joining the mainland.

    Pass this critical news on to others; few Americans know it outside of official Washington, DC circles.

  • docmerlin

    Another stupid attack on another stupid nation.

  • Mike55_Mahoney

    Congress cannot, by legislation or resolution discharge the responsibilities of Commander in Chief. This is an unconstitutional usurpation of executive power. I will not be swayed by the senate ploy to make me think they have this power in order to convince me they can leash or bring to heel the dogs of war, once they release them.

  • Arch

    If the mission is to destroy or degrade Assad’s chem warfare capability, boots on the ground are essential. If we recognize the need to deny Assad use of these weapons, ground troops are required.

    Suppose we know exactly where Assad is storing a ton of VX munitions. If we target the building or bunker with a Tomahawk or a JDAM, it’s going to blow the agent 2,000 to 3,000 feet up in the atmosphere. Anyone within a few thousand feet or several miles downwind will need atropine, decontamination and medical treatment. While the intention is good, the consequences are awful.

    Disposing of nerve agents is an industrial rather than a military activity. In my opinion, this is a very bad idea.

  • Anonymous

    I wanted to write you this bit of word to finally give many thanks over again with the magnificent opinions you’ve documented on this site. It was certainly wonderfully generous of people like you to supply extensively what a number of people would have made available as an electronic book in order to make some profit on their own, most importantly considering the fact that you could possibly have done it if you wanted. The tactics additionally acted to become a great way to be certain that other people have the same dream much like my personal own to know many more on the topic of this issue. I know there are thousands of more enjoyable periods up front for folks who scan your blog post.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this web site. Thanks, I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your web site?

  • Anonymous

    Having read this I thought it was very informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this article together. I once again find myself spending way to much time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it!

  • Anonymous

    I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one these days..

  • Anonymous

    Simply a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw outstanding pattern.

  • Anonymous

    I believe you have noted some very interesting details, thanks for the post.

  • Anonymous

    I’ve learn a few good stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much attempt you set to make such a fantastic informative site.

  • Anonymous

    It is really a nice and helpful piece of information. I?¦m satisfied that you simply shared this helpful information with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • Anonymous

    Thank you for sharing with us, I think this website really stands out : D.

  • Anonymous

    I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you create this website yourself? Plz reply back as I’m looking to create my own blog and would like to know wheere u got this from. thanks

  • Anonymous

    Its like you read my thoughts! You appear to understand so much approximately this, like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you can do with a few percent to pressure the message home a bit, but other than that, this is great blog. An excellent read. I will definitely be back.

  • Anonymous

    You are a very smart individual!

  • Anonymous

    Heya! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing many months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any methods to protect against hackers?

  • Anonymous

    I have recently started a site, the information you provide on this site has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work.

  • Anonymous

    I discovered your blog website on google and check a number of of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the excellent operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Searching for forward to studying extra from you later on!…

  • Anonymous

    I?¦ll right away take hold of your rss feed as I can not in finding your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly permit me know in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  • Anonymous

    Very interesting info!Perfect just what I was looking for!

  • Anonymous

    I am glad to be a visitant of this unadulterated weblog! , regards for this rare information! .

  • Anonymous

    You made some decent factors there. I appeared on the web for the problem and located most individuals will go together with with your website.

  • Anonymous

    Together with almost everything that appears to be building inside this particular subject material, many of your viewpoints tend to be somewhat refreshing. Nevertheless, I am sorry, but I do not subscribe to your entire strategy, all be it radical none the less. It looks to everybody that your comments are actually not totally rationalized and in reality you are generally your self not even thoroughly convinced of your argument. In any event I did enjoy examining it.

  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous

    It’s truly a nice and useful piece of info. I’m glad that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • Anonymous

    Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  • Anonymous

    I¦ve been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or blog posts on this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Studying this info So i am glad to show that I have a very excellent uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed. I such a lot indisputably will make sure to don¦t disregard this site and provides it a look on a relentless basis.

  • Anonymous

    you’re actually a good webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any unique trick. Also, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a magnificent activity in this matter!

  • Anonymous

    I have been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this blog. Thanks , I’ll try and check back more often. How frequently you update your site?

  • Anonymous

    so much superb info on here, : D.

  • Anonymous

    Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you protect against it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  • Anonymous

    LY4CXs incredibly great submit, i really appreciate this internet internet site, carry on it

  • Anonymous

    Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your web site in internet explorer, would check this… IE still is the market leader and a good portion of people will miss your excellent writing because of this problem.,about,index.html

  • Anonymous

    Thank you, I have just been searching for info about this subject for ages and yours is the best I have came upon so far. But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you certain about the source?

  • tom si jerry

    I truly appreciate this article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  • Anonymous

    I simply couldn’t depart your site before suggesting that I really enjoyed the usual info an individual supply on your visitors? Is gonna be back frequently to check out new posts

  • Anonymous

    I have been checking out some of your articles and it’s pretty nice stuff. I will surely bookmark your blog.

  • Anonymous

    Hey there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be okay. I’m undoubtedly enjoying your blog and look forward to new posts.

  • Anonymous

    Fantastic site. Plenty of useful information here. I’m sending it to some pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And certainly, thanks on your sweat!

  • Anonymous

    Excellent site you have here but I was curious about if you knew of any forums that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really like to be a part of group where I can get suggestions from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Many thanks!

  • esurance life insurance

    Use our free quotes to get discounts on auto or home insurance. Get quotes by zip code and save up to 505 annually.

  • esurance online quote

    Whats amazing post here. I will turn attention on your description.

  • state farm insurance company

    Try discounts up to 40 percent on auto or home insurance, get quotes by zip code from top insurance companies.

  • state farm insurance

    Get quotes on State farm for auto and home policy. Save with State farm quote!

  • american mutual insurance company

    Get quotes by zip code and save up to 505 annually.

  • amica life insurance

    Its easy and fast to get insurance quotes by 5 digit zip code.

  • amax insurance locations

    Also I suggest everyone try our huge discounts on auto or home insurance

  • amax insurance near me

    Also I suggest everyone try our huge discounts on auto or home insurance

  • amax insurance fort worth tx

    Try discounts up to 40% on auto or home insurance.

  • Anonymous

    I am continually browsing online for ideas that can aid me. Thanks!

  • federated mutual insurance

    Also I suggest everyone try our huge discounts on auto or home insurance

  • federated

    Choose our best quotes from mutual home and auto insurance companies. Save on policies!

  • Anonymous

    Pretty! This was a really wonderful post. Thank you for your provided information.

  • Anonymous

    superb post.Ne’er knew this, regards for letting me know.

  • Anonymous

    What i do not understood is actually how you are no longer really a lot more neatly-appreciated than you might be right now. You are so intelligent. You understand therefore considerably in terms of this subject, made me in my view believe it from so many varied angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be involved until it’s something to do with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs great. All the time handle it up!

  • Anonymous

    Wohh precisely what I was looking for, appreciate it for putting up.

  • Anonymous


  • commercial insurance quotes

    Try discounts up to 40% on auto or home insurance.

  • acuity insurance login

    Get auto and home insurance policies

  • omega insurance choctaw ok

    Choose affordable rate on Omega insurance. Get quotes online for free!

  • omega insurance bakersfield

    Get cheaper quotes, save more on insurance quotes here!

  • Anonymous

    Perfect work you have done, this site is really cool with fantastic info .

  • Anonymous

    Real superb information can be found on website. “Society produces rogues, and education makes one rogue more clever than another.” by Oscar Fingall O’Flahertie Wills Wilde.

  • Anonymous

    After research a few of the blog posts in your website now, and I truly like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site record and will be checking again soon. Pls try my website online as effectively and let me know what you think.

  • Anonymous

    Hello. remarkable job. I did not imagine this. This is a splendid story. Thanks!

  • Anonymous

    Incredible! This blog looks just like my old one! It’s on a totally different topic but it has pretty much the same page layout and design. Great choice of colors!

  • Anonymous

    I wish to express my appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from such a setting. As a result of checking throughout the search engines and getting tricks which were not productive, I thought my life was done. Existing devoid of the answers to the problems you’ve solved all through your entire article content is a critical case, and the kind that could have negatively damaged my career if I hadn’t noticed the blog. Your personal capability and kindness in maneuvering all areas was crucial. I don’t know what I would’ve done if I had not discovered such a stuff like this. I can now look forward to my future. Thanks so much for your skilled and amazing guide. I won’t hesitate to recommend your web site to any individual who should have tips on this subject.

  • Anonymous

    What i don’t understood is actually how you’re not really much more well-liked than you might be right now. You’re so intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, made me personally consider it from numerous varied angles. Its like men and women aren’t fascinated unless it is one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs great. Always maintain it up!

  • Anonymous

    I was looking through some of your blog posts on this website and I believe this website is real informative! Keep on posting.

  • Anonymous

    Very efficiently written article. It will be valuable to everyone who utilizes it, including me. Keep up the good work – for sure i will check out more posts.

  • Anonymous

    Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any tips?

  • Anonymous

    I am commenting to let you know of the nice discovery my wife’s daughter obtained browsing yuor web blog. She discovered several details, with the inclusion of what it is like to possess a very effective teaching heart to have many more without hassle grasp specified tricky subject areas. You undoubtedly surpassed my desires. Thank you for showing these warm and friendly, trustworthy, informative as well as cool tips on this topic to Jane.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, wonderful blog structure! How long have you ever been running a blog for? you make blogging look easy. The full look of your website is excellent, as well as the content material!

  • Anonymous

    Nearly all of what you say is supprisingly precise and that makes me ponder why I had not looked at this with this light before. Your piece truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific subject goes. However at this time there is one issue I am not necessarily too cozy with so whilst I try to reconcile that with the central theme of your point, permit me observe just what all the rest of the subscribers have to say.Nicely done.

  • Anonymous

    Some truly prize articles on this website , saved to bookmarks.

  • Anonymous

    You have brought up a very wonderful points, appreciate it for the post.

  • Anonymous

    wFcndt Really informative blog article.Thanks Again. Great.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...