Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 30, 2015

Tax Bill Highlights Split Between Grover Norquist, Club for Growth

Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform ATR Club for Growth taxes

Norquist (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

The tax-cut-extension bill set for the Senate floor this week highlights a longstanding fissure between Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform and the Club for Growth.

The dispute comes down to this: The club would rather see the entire extenders package disappear — and thus see higher revenue flowing to the government, at least in the short-term — because it believes that many of the provisions are anti-growth and would harm the economy in the long run. For Norquist’s ATR, lower revenue is the top priority.

The two groups have faced off in the past — on a repeal of an ethanol tax break that would have violated ATR’s no-tax pledge, and on broader strategy, with the club nearly always opposing major budget legislation that has reached President Barack Obama’s desk, while Norquist has often supported the deals cut by GOP leadership.

The club has already issued a key vote alert against the Senate package that would resurrect more than 50 lapsed tax cuts, ranging from those as narrow as the accelerated depreciation schedule for thoroughbred racehorses to state and local sales tax deductions.

“This bill is mainly a hodge-podge of special interest earmarks in the federal tax code. Thankfully, these extenders expired at the end of 2013, so the best thing the Senate can do now is nothing,” the Club for Growth said. “Majority Leader Harry Reid should cancel consideration of this bill and instead call for broad, pro-growth tax reform that will lower rates and remove other burdensome carve-outs in the tax code.”

Oddly enough, since the so-called “extenders” have already lapsed, they technically constitute new tax cuts at this point.

Americans for Tax Reform has rejected the idea that the Senate would be better off taking no action.

Ryan Ellis, ATR’s tax policy director, in a Monday blog post highlighted support for an amendment process that would permit targeted elimination of some of the tax provisions, but not all of them.

“Amendments to remove tax policies which should not be allowed to continue (as opposed to pro-growth tax relief, which should continue) should be made in order. ATR is concerned that to date, many conservatives have been deeply confused on this distinction. We have heard green energy tax credits mentioned in the same breath as accelerated depreciation, for example,” he wrote. “We would urge senators considering amendments to be careful about throwing out the pro-growth baby with the crony capitalist bathwater.”

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had not made any announcements Monday about the path forward for the extenders bill and if he would lock down the process to preclude the offering of amendments.

Finance Chairman Ron Wyden has said this two-year extenders package would be the only such measure to move on his watch, with the Oregon Democrat having an eye on the long-elusive first overhaul of the tax code since 1986. An administration official told CQ Roll Call last week that “our position remains unchanged and we continue to believe the extenders should be paid for,” though there has been no veto threat made against the Senate bill.

The Obama administration did threaten a veto of House legislation that would make the research and development tax credit permanent, citing budget effects.

ATR backed the House’s research and development bill, while the Club for Growth did not key vote against it, although club president Chris Chocola wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal last month urging that Congress leave even that tax break expired.

Barney Keller, the group’s spokesman, said that was because the club believes that an extension bill will most likely be the path forward for extenders and therefore was the focus of their efforts.

“Everybody knows what the final piece of legislation is going to look like and we’ve made our position on that clear. So we’ve key voted against the [Senate bill] and we’ll take a look at what ever else get’s brought up in Congress, but we don’t feel like we have to score every vote,” Keller said.

A key vote against a $156 billion tax cut presumably also would have been unpopular with the club’s allies in the House. Only one Republican voted against the bill — John Campbell of California.

On balance, ATR said the Senate’s two-year extenders should be allowed to move through the Senate, “warts and all.”

“Ideally, the best of these tax relief items would be made permanent law, and the rest would be plowed into pro-growth tax reform,” Ellis said. “For now, though, the mandate for the Senate is clear: do no harm.”


Will Obama Threaten to Veto the Senate’s Tax Cut Bill? 

Heller May Try to Attach Unemployment Extension to Tax Cut Bill

Comments (19)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Lawrence

    May 12, 2014
    10:32 p.m.

    Come on guys, pass the EUC bill already. If I lose my house Im going to be so pissed

  2. White Army

    May 15, 2014
    12:47 p.m.

    Since liberty cannot survive if misunderstood, it is critical that liberty’s proven principles be disseminated as widely as possible.

    • Snertly

      June 27, 2014
      12:09 p.m.

      Liberty is misunderstood all the time. The greatest amount of freedom for the greatest number of people is pretty basic. Still gets misunderstood.

  3. Snertly

    June 27, 2014
    12:07 p.m.

    Ellis said. “For now, though, the mandate for the Senate is clear: do no harm.”

    Really? Can’t tell that from out in the fields.

  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    7:39 a.m.

    so much excellent info on here, : D.

  5. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    6:44 a.m.

    I was looking at some of your posts on this website and I conceive this website is really informative! Continue putting up.

  6. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:52 p.m.

    Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a leisure account it. Glance complicated to far introduced agreeable from you! By the way, how can we communicate?

  7. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    5:10 a.m.

    you are in reality a excellent webmaster. The site loading pace is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a great task in this matter!

  8. Anonymous

    July 19, 2015
    8:10 a.m.

    The root of your writing while appearing agreeable initially, did not work perfectly with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you actually were able to make me a believer but only for a while. I nevertheless have a problem with your jumps in logic and you might do nicely to fill in all those gaps. If you actually can accomplish that, I could surely be fascinated.

  9. Anonymous

    July 19, 2015
    8:16 a.m.

    Have you ever considered about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and all. However think of if you added some great photos or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and video clips, this blog could certainly be one of the most beneficial in its field. Excellent blog!

  10. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    12:46 a.m.

    Along with everything which seems to be developing inside this subject material, your viewpoints tend to be somewhat radical. On the other hand, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your whole idea, all be it stimulating none the less. It appears to me that your opinions are generally not entirely validated and in simple fact you are yourself not wholly certain of your assertion. In any case I did appreciate examining it.

  11. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    6:18 a.m.

    I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thanks , I’ll try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your site?

  12. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    5:35 a.m.

    Great post. I am facing a couple of these problems.

  13. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    8:53 a.m.

    of course like your web site but you need to take a look at the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I in finding it very bothersome to inform the reality then again I¦ll certainly come back again.

  14. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    5:22 p.m.

    Some really nice and utilitarian information on this site, besides I think the layout holds wonderful features.

  15. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    10:49 p.m.

    Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have developed some nice procedures and we are looking to swap solutions with other folks, please shoot me an email if interested.

  16. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    5:23 p.m.

    Hello, you used to write wonderful, but the last few posts have been kinda boring… I miss your great writings. Past few posts are just a little bit out of track! come on!

  17. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    8:22 p.m.

    Regards for this post, I am a big big fan of this web site would like to continue updated.

  18. Anonymous

    July 26, 2015
    6:13 a.m.

    I appreciate you sharing this article post. Really thank you! Cool.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...