Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 30, 2015

Immigration Bill’s Passage Belies Senate’s Enduring Dysfunction (Updated)

Updated 7:50 p.m. | Thursday may have represented a great victory for advocates of the Senate’s bipartisan rewrite of immigration laws, but the way the debate ended didn’t portend an easing of partisanship in the chamber.

After three weeks of debate and 18 votes, the Senate voted overwhelmingly, 68-32, to pass an immigration overhaul after years of trying and failing to accomplish similar goals.

“At times like these when our better angels are tested again, to reject this bill would tear the fabric of America asunder. It would declare that America no longer seeks to be the shining city on the hill that attracts and is admired by people around the globe,” New York Democratic Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a leader of the “gang of eight,” said just before the vote.

But when the Senate returns after the Independence Day recess, the partisan divide is on track to widen, particularly when it comes to a looming fight over spending and confirmation of a number of outstanding presidential nominees.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has hinted that GOP-led filibusters of Obama administration nominees may prompt him to employ the so-called nuclear option to curtail Republican blockades on the Senate floor. And that ensuing battle could do permanent damage to bipartisan relations.

To be sure, the Senate’s dysfunction eased slightly during debate on the immigration overhaul, but signs of trouble remained even as supporters praised passage.

Sen. Mary L. Landrieu, D-La., spoke at length on the floor last week as the immigration amendment process appeared to be at a logjam. In an interview after Thursday’s vote, she expressed her support for the final immigration product but again criticized the procedural obstacles once the bill reached the floor.

“I have a lot of respect for the ‘gang of eight’ and for Sen. [Patrick J.] Leahy in the way he conducted the Judiciary Committee, which was as open as any … committee markup that I’ve seen around here in a long time,” she said.

But Landrieu, who has a habit of speaking her mind, did not mince words about what she viewed as a victory for immigration but an omen for the Senate’s operations.

“The Senate stood up and met that challenge. The downside is, unfortunately there are still a handful of senators on the Republican side — and they will go unnamed, but most everyone around here knows who they are — that simply refuse to come to any common ground on floor debate, and as a result, once bills get to the floor we have lost the ability to do any significant amending, period,” Landrieu said.

“I don’t regret the effort, I just regret the status that the floor is a broken place right now, despite the great victory that we had,” she said of an attempt to move consensus amendments.

An agreement to consider further amendments never came about after Reid made the procedural moves needed to ensure a timely departure for the July Fourth recess. Advocates and opponents of the immigration package exchanged all-too-familiar barbs over process.

Still, Reid took steps before the immigration debate got under way to avoid contentious issues, saying he didn’t plan to bring anything else to the floor that could complicate the bipartisan bill.

“I’m going to do nothing to interfere with immigration. I think it’s important for our country,” Reid told reporters May 23.

Accordingly, the Senate processed some noncontroversial business while the immigration debate carried on but steered clear of serious controversies. For instance, senators this week easily confirmed Penny Pritzker to be Commerce secretary (that vote was 99-1) and Anthony Foxx to be Transportation secretary (that vote was 100-0). However, Reid didn’t move to call votes on nominees that would face lots of Republican opposition, such as Thomas E. Perez to helm the Labor Department or Gina McCarthy to be EPA administrator.

But now that immigration has passed, Senate Republicans expect those nominations and others to face votes in July, with Reid moving forward on his plan to put the opposition to the test. That could lead to a move by Democrats to effectively change the Senate’s rules with a simple majority vote using the nuclear option if the GOP engages in filibusters of too many nominees, keeping President Barack Obama from getting his choices in place.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and other Republicans have given regular floor speeches throughout the immigration debate about the rules.

Then there’s the issue of federal spending.

The Senate Appropriations Committee is processing regular fiscal 2014 appropriations bills through committee, with the Transportation-HUD and Energy-Water measures moving through the panel Thursday morning. Four of them will be ready for the floor, if Reid chooses to call them up.

However, Republicans have uniformly opposed the top-line spending levels developed by Appropriations Chairwoman Barbara A. Mikulski, D-Md.

Landrieu, who chairs the appropriations subpanel overseeing the Department of Homeland Security budget, pointed to Mikulski as the best hope for that process, which has totally broken down in recent years.

“My only optimism rests on the leader of the committee itself. Barbara Mikulski is truly an extraordinary leader, and if anybody can find a way forward, you know, when we get to the floor, she can,” Landrieu said.

Update 7:50 p.m.

A senior Democratic aide tells our colleague Humberto Sanchez that Reid’s expected to file motions to limit debate on at least one of number of contentious nominations during the week of July 8.  Cloture motions for McCarthy at EPA and Perez at  Labor are among the possibilities.

In addition to McCarthy and Perez, Reid’s choices include nominees to positions at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the National Labor Relations Board who currently hold disputed recess appointments. The Supreme Court announced this week that next term, it plans to consider a case involving the NLRB that hinges on the Constitution’s definition of “the Recess of the Senate.”

The Senate did confirm several other nominations before adjourning for the holiday break Thursday, including one very important to Reid — the reappointment of Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairwoman Allison M. Macfarlane. Like Reid, she’s an opponent of establishing a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

Macfarlane will now be at the commission through June 30, 2018.

Just last week, Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., referenced the Yucca project during a debate over the Senate’s rules.

 

Comments (26)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Reality

    July 1, 2013
    12:03 p.m.

    The amnesty bill’s passage is simply an indicator of the power of special interests and lobbyists — that’s all this bill is. A handout grab bag for lobbyists.

  2. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    5:11 a.m.

    You made a few good points there. I did a search on the topic and found the majority of folks will agree with your blog.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  3. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    2 p.m.

    I couldn’t resist commenting

    http://spobae.tumblr.com/

  4. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    10:16 a.m.

    Very interesting information!Perfect just what I was searching for!

    http://www.furtdsolinopv.com/

  5. Anonymous

    July 6, 2015
    6:58 p.m.

    You have mentioned very interesting details! ps decent internet site.

    http://topcheapinsurance.com/homeowners-insurance.html

  6. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    7:35 a.m.

    Thankyou for all your efforts that you have put in this. very interesting info .

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  7. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    5:14 p.m.

    But a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw outstanding style.

  8. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:32 p.m.

    You have brought up a very superb points, thankyou for the post.

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1132921

  9. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    5:07 a.m.

    You have noted very interesting details! ps nice site.

    https://duck.co/user/infoasistencia

  10. Anonymous

    July 11, 2015
    11:36 a.m.

    Good info. Lucky me I reach on your website by accident, I bookmarked it.

    http://www.intactgaming.com/profile/duck50gander

  11. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    1:04 p.m.

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was curious what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100 certain. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Kudos

    http://homeownersinsurancem.com/amica-car-and-home-insurance.html

  12. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    2:51 p.m.

    hi!,I really like your writing so so much! share we keep up a correspondence extra approximately your article on AOL? I require an expert on this space to unravel my problem. May be that’s you! Taking a look forward to see you.

    http://homeownersinsurancem.com/amica-car-and-home-insurance.html

  13. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    5:52 p.m.

    wonderful points altogether, you just gained a brand new reader. What would you recommend about your post that you made some days ago? Any positive?

    http://www.wat.tv/video/salon-massage-naturiste-massage-79q5z_79q5x_.html

  14. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    10:51 p.m.

    You are a very bright individual!

    http://vimeo.com/126527913

  15. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    5:36 a.m.

    Very efficiently written information. It will be helpful to anyone who utilizes it, including myself. Keep up the good work – can’r wait to read more posts.

    http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/pencil93chess/

  16. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    8:03 a.m.

    I don’t unremarkably comment but I gotta say regards for the post on this perfect one : D.

    https://disqus.com/by/vicobusk/

  17. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    1:13 p.m.

    Merely wanna remark on few general things, The website style and design is perfect, the content is rattling great : D.

    http://best-home-based-business-idea.com/mesothelioma-lawyer-asbestos-cancer-lawsuit/

  18. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    6:20 p.m.

    We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site offered us with valuable info to work on. You have done an impressive job and our whole community will be thankful to you.

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org/state-farm-quote.html

  19. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    4:25 a.m.

    The next time I learn a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I do know it was my choice to read, however I really thought youd have one thing fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you would fix should you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.

    http://lowcostautoquotes.com

  20. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    8:15 a.m.

    he blog was how do i say it… relevant, finally something that helped me. Thanks

    http://lowcostautoquotes.com/home-insurance.html

  21. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    11:33 a.m.

    I envy your work, thanks for all the great blog posts.

    http://split.us

  22. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    11:14 p.m.

    As soon as I detected this website I went on reddit to share some of the love with them.

    https://bestplumbers.com

  23. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    12:41 a.m.

    Do you have a spam problem on this site; I also am a blogger, and I was wondering your situation; we have developed some nice practices and we are looking to exchange solutions with other folks, be sure to shoot me an email if interested.

    https://bestplumbers.com

  24. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    7:53 a.m.

    After all, what a great site and informative posts, I will upload inbound link – bookmark this web site? Regards, Reader.

    http://bathmatehydromax-x30.weebly.com/blog/cara-membesarkan-zakar-adakah-berjaya

  25. Anonymous

    July 26, 2015
    12:23 a.m.

    Real superb visual appeal on this internet site, I’d rate it 10 10.

    http://resa.iff.edu.br/blog/view/391791/cordell-home-building-insurance-calculator

  26. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    1:51 p.m.

    There’s noticeably a bundle to find out about this. I assume you made sure nice points in features also.

    http://www.warriorforum.com/showthread.php?t=1094532

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...