Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 7, 2015

McConnell Decries Nominations at Expense of Defense Bill

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Tuesday Democrats are using nomination votes to deflect attention from Iran sanctions.

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday said that by holding votes on nominees Democrats were trying to avoid amendment debate on a defense bill and divert attention from the issue of Iran sanctions.

The Kentuckian is not the first Republican to decry the potential lack of debate on the annual defense authorization legislation — earlier Tuesday, Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma threatened to delay the bill unless more amendment votes were held — but the leader was the most direct in ascribing ulterior motives to the maneuvering.

“What I think ought to be done on the defense bill, instead of doing all these nonessential nominations this week, we ought to be turning to the defense bill and opening it up for … amendments as we’ve always done in the past,” McConnell said. “This is a rather transparent attempt to prevent a vote on enhanced Iran sanctions.”

He called the agreement between House and Senate defense leaders in conjunction with the lack of amendment debate an effort to “circumvent the Senate.”

Of course, both Democrats and Republicans worked on the deal that would clear the defense bill before Christmas. And before Thanksgiving, objections from GOP senators to votes on agreed-upon amendments helped bring a debate on the defense bill to a halt. But tensions between the two parties in the aftermath of a move from Majority Leader Harry Reid to change the Senate rules are threatening to complicate an already uneasy situation.

Also before Thanksgiving, the Nevada Democrat tried to assure members seeking tougher Iran sanctions that he would give them time on the floor. But that assurance now seems more politically expedient and as a result of frustration with the stalled defense bill than a commitment to the cause.

With the emerging objections of both Senate rank and file and Republican leadership, the chances for clearing a bill that has been signed into law every year for 51 straight years are as murky as ever.

Comments (4)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Sally

    Dec. 10, 2013
    8:57 p.m.

    Gee, Mitch, maybe if you had not spent five years blocking any and all nominations, we would not have so many judgeships to be filled. And maybe, if you guys actually worked instead of posing for cameras and whining about the President, there would have been time to discuss amendments. This is your mess, buddy, sleep in it.

  2. Bruce Geiger

    Dec. 19, 2013
    9:10 a.m.

    The Obama gang has filled the government with people that will be there long after 2016. A major effort to elect intelligent, moderate candidates in 2014 must be made to offset this built in bias. This is no time to sit back and observe.

  3. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    4:38 a.m.

    Hello there, simply became alert to your weblog via Google, and found that it’s really informative. I am going to be careful for brussels. I will appreciate when you proceed this in future. A lot of other folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  4. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    2:34 p.m.

    Really Appreciate this post, is there any way I can receive an email whenever you publish a new update?

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...