Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
October 10, 2015

McConnell Opposes Syria Strike

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Tuesday announced his opposition to authorizing strikes on Syria at the same time that it was becoming clearer that the Senate may not proceed with an outright authorization resolution.

McConnell, who is up for re-election in 2014 and facing a conservative challenger, is the only one of the “big four” congressional leaders to oppose striking Syria in response to intelligence suggesting that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against his own people.

Libertarian Rand Paul, the junior senator in the Bluegrass State, has been one of the most vocal opponents of engaging in Syria, though McConnell took steps to point out that he was not opposing strikes on isolationist grounds.

“I have never been an isolationist. And a vote against this resolution shouldn’t be confused by anyone as a turn in that direction. But just as the most committed isolationist could be convinced of the need for intervention under the right circumstances when confronted with a threat, so too do the internationalists among us believe that all interventions are not created equal. And this proposal just does not stand up,” McConnell said in a floor address. “It’s not exactly a state secret that I’m no fan of this president’s foreign policy. On the deepest level, I think it comes down to a fundamentally different view of America’s role in the world. Unlike the president, I’ve always been a firm and unapologetic believer in the idea that America isn’t just another nation among many; that we’re exceptional. As I’ve said, I believe we have a duty, as a superpower without imperialistic aims, to help maintain an international order and balance of power that we and other allies have worked very hard on over the years.

“International order is not maintained by some global police force, which only exists in a liberal fantasy. International order is maintained — its backbone — is American military might,” McConnell continued, as a group of bipartisan senators, including some of the most hawkish in Congress, negotiated a new resolution pinned to United Nations involvement in Syria.

McConnell focused much of his lengthy address on criticizing President Barack Obama — the president doesn’t believe America is “exceptional”; he is “reluctant”; he has not made a credible case on why American interests are threatened by the events in Syria and shouldn’t send a “save-the-date” card to enemies by telegraphing strikes. Of course, part of that “save-the-date” process was consulting Congress as opposed to acting unilaterally.

Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., challenged McConnell on this particular claim, repeating that the Republican leader “can’t have it both ways” in his demands and critiques of the president.

“I listened to the senator from Kentucky criticize the president because he’s ‘telegraphing’ his punches when it comes to what’s going to happen in Syria. Well, he can’t have it both ways,” Durbin said. “This president could make a unilateral decision and attack without even consulting Congress and thereby maintain the element of surprise or he could do as the president’s done and follow what he considers to be our constitutional requirement of a national debate before we engage in military action.”

In 2011, many Republicans (and Democrats, too) complained that the president implemented a no-fly zone in Libya without seeking congressional authorization first. In a March 2011 floor speech, McConnell himself said: “It is fair to ask, what is the role of our military and military alliance in providing support to an opposition we are only now beginning to understand? These concerns and questions are equally relevant here in the Senate and in the Congress since it is the responsibility of Congress to declare war, if it is war, and, of course, to fund our military operations… this latest decision was taken without adequate consultation with Congress or sufficient explanation to the American people.”

In his response to McConnell on the floor Tuesday, Durbin also pointed out McConnell’s habitual opposition to Obama, regardless of the topic.

“He is a member of the loyal opposition. It’s no surprise that he’s critical of the policies of President Barack Obama. That is the nature of the debate, the American debate which takes place on the floor of this chamber on a regular basis,” Durbin, an Obama ally, said.

Full text of McConnell’s address, as prepared for delivery, below:

“First, I’d like to welcome the President to the Capitol today. Members on both sides of the aisle are eager to hear from him, and to share their own thoughts. We look forward to a spirited and constructive exchange.

“It’s often said that of all the questions we face as lawmakers, none is more serious or indeed more difficult than the question of whether to commit ourselves to a military action. That’s why it is so important for us to have this debate, to lay out the arguments for and against military action in Syria, to let the public know where we stand on this issue, and why.

“But if debates like this are always challenging, in some ways this one has been even more difficult. Not because of some political calculus, though cynics will always suspect that. No, this debate has been made more difficult because even those of us who truly want to support the Commander in Chief have struggled to understand the purpose of the mission.

“Over the past several days, I’ve spoken with a lot of people, a lot of Kentuckians. And I have to tell you, most of them aren’t exactly clear about the mission themselves, or shy about saying so. What I’ve told them is that I understand their concerns. I share them. I also appreciate the war-weariness out there. But then, I tell them that there other potential concerns that we can’t ignore here either.

“Chief among them is the fact that the credibility of the Commander of Chief matters, and related to that is the fact that we can’t afford as a country to withdraw from the world stage.

“So no one should be faulted for being skeptical about this proposal, regardless of what party they’re in, or for being dumfounded at the ham-handed manner in which the White House announced it; there is absolutely no reason to signal to the enemy when and how, and for how long, you plan to strike them — none. As I’ve said before, you don’t send out a “save-the-date” card to the enemy. And yet there are other important considerations to keep in mind here as well that go beyond the wisdom or the marketing of this proposal.

“I’ve spent a lot of time weighing all these things. I’ve thought a lot about America’s obligations, and the irreplaceable role that I’ve always believed, and still believe, America plays in the world.

“And I’ve also thought a lot about the context, about this President’s vision, and his record, and what it says about whether we should be confident in his ability to bring about a favorable outcome in Syria. Because how we got to this point says a lot about where we may be headed.

“And that’s why, before announcing my vote, I think it’s important to look back at some of this President’s other decisions on matters of foreign policy and national security, and then turn back to what he’s proposing now in Syria, because, in the end, these things can’t be separated.


“Now, it’s not exactly a state secret that I’m no fan of this President’s foreign policy. On the deepest level, I think it comes down to a fundamentally different view of America’s role in the world. Unlike the President, I’ve always been a firm and unapologetic believer in the idea that America isn’t just another nation among many; that we’re exceptional. As I’ve said, I believe we have a duty, as a superpower without imperialistic aims, to help maintain an international order and balance of power that we and other allies have worked very hard on over the years.

“This President, on the other hand, has always been a very reluctant Commander in Chief. We saw that in the rhetoric of his famous Cairo speech, and in speeches he gave in other foreign capitals in the early days of his administration. The tone, and the policies that followed, were meant to project a humbler, more withdrawn America … and, frankly, I’m hard pressed to see any of the good that’s come from it.

“Any list would have to start with the arbitrary deadlines for military withdrawal … and the triumphant declaration that Guantanamo would be closed within a year, without any plan for what to do with its detainees … there were the executive orders that ended the Central Intelligence Agency’s detention and interrogation programs…

“We all saw the so-called reset with Russia, and how the President’s stated commitment to a world without nuclear weapons led him to hastily sign an arms treaty with Russia that did nothing to substantially reduce its nuclear stockpile, or its tactical nuclear weapons. We saw the President announce a strategic pivot to the Asia-Pacific, without any real plan to fund it, and an effort to end the capture, interrogation, and detention of terrorists, as well as the return of the old idea that terrorism should be treated as a law-enforcement matter. After a decade-long counterinsurgency in Afghanistan, we’ve seen the President’s failure to invest in the kind of strategic modernization that’s needed to make his pivot to Asia meaningful.

“Specifically, his failure to make the kind of investments that are needed to maintain our dominance in the Asia Pacific theatre, in the kind of naval, air, and Marine Corps forces that we’ll need there in the years ahead, could have tragic consequences down the road.

“His domestic agenda has also obviously had serious implications for our global standing. While borrowing trillions and wasting taxpayer dollars here at home, the President has imposed a policy of austerity at the Pentagon that threatens to undermine our stabilizing presence around the globe. And, of course, we’ve all seen how eager the President is to declare an end to the War on Terror.

“Well, unfortunately, the world just hasn’t cooperated with the President’s vision or his hopes. Far from responding favorably to this gentler approach, it’s become arguably more dangerous. We’ve learned the hard way that being nice to our enemies doesn’t make them like you, or clear a path to peace. I understand that the President ran for office on an anti-war platform, that his rise to political power was marked by a determination to get us out of Afghanistan and Iraq and declare an end to the War on Terror. I know he’d rather focus on his domestic agenda. But the ongoing threat from Al Qaeda and its affiliates and the turmoil unleashed by uprisings in North Africa and the broader Middle East, not to mention the rise of Chinese military power, make it clear to me, at least, that this is not the time for America to shrink from the world stage.

“The world is a dangerous place. In the wake of the Arab Spring, large parts of the Sinai, of Libya, of Syria are now basically ungoverned. We’ve seen prison breaks in Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, and the release of hundreds of prisoners in Egypt. Terrorists have also escaped from prisons in Yemen, a country that is no more ready to detain the terrorists at Guantanamo now they were in 2009. And the flow of foreign fighters into Syria suggests that the civil war there will last for years, regardless of whether Assad is still in power. Yes, the President deserves praise for weakening Al Qaeda’s senior leadership. But the threat we face from Al Qaeda affiliates is very real. These terrorists are adaptable. They’re versatile, lethal, resilient, and they aren’t going away. Pockets of these terrorists extend from North Africa to the Persian Gulf. It’s time he faced up to it.

“And it’s time he face up to something else as well: international order is not maintained by some global police force; which only exists in a liberal fantasy. International order is maintained — its backbone — is American military might.


“Which brings me back to Syria.

“For about two years now, Syria has been mired in a ferocious civil war, with more than 100,000 killed with conventional arms, according to U.N. estimates. This tragic situation has prompted many to look to the United States for help. And so one year ago, President Obama made a declaration: if Assad used or started moving chemical weapons, he’d do something about it.

“Well, as we all know, on August 21 of this year, that red line was crossed. The President’s delayed response was to call for a show of force, for targeted, limited strikes against the regime. We have been told that the purpose of these strikes is to deter and degrade the Assad regime’s ability to use chemical weapons.

“Let’s take a closer look at these aims.

“First, no one disputes that the atrocities committed in Syria in recent weeks are unspeakable. No one disputes that those responsible for these crimes against the innocent should be held to account. We were right to condemn these crimes.

“But let’s be very clear about something. These attacks, monstrous as they are, were not a direct attack against the United States or one of its treaty allies. And just so there’s no confusion, let me assure everyone that if a weapon of mass destruction were used against the U.S. or one of our allies, Congress would react immediately with an authorization for the use of force in support of an overwhelming response. I would introduce the resolution myself.

“So no leader in North Korea or Iran, or any other enemy of the United States, should take any solace if the U.S. were not to respond to these attacks with an action against Syria. We will never tolerate the use of chemical weapons against the United States or any of our treaty allies.

“Second, in the course of administration hearings and briefings over the past several days, Secretary of State Kerry has revealed that Assad has used chemical weapons repeatedly over the last year. So there’s a further question here about why the administration didn’t respond on those occasions.

“Third, Assad, as I’ve indicated, has killed tens of thousands of people with conventional weapons. Is there any reason to believe he won’t continue if the President’s strikes are as limited as we’re told they’ll be?

“Fourth, what if in degrading Assad’s control of these weapons you make it easier for other extremist elements, like those associated with the Al Nusrah front and Al Qaeda, to get hold of them?

“Or what if by weakening the Syrian military, you end up tilting the military balance toward a fractured opposition that’s in no position to govern or control anything right now? I think the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Dempsey, put this particular issue best when he recently suggested in a letter to Congress that the issue here isn’t about choosing between two sides in Syria, it’s about choosing one among many sides, and that, in his estimation, even if we were to choose sides, the side we chose wouldn’t be in a position to promote their own interests or ours.

“And then there’s the question of how Assad himself would react to U.S. action in Syria. If Assad views an air campaign as preparation for regime change, then he may lose all constraint in the use of his arsenal, chemical or otherwise, and lose any incentive whatsoever to move to the negotiating table. It’s very clear that the unintended consequences of this strike could very well be a new cycle of escalation, which then drags us into a larger war that we’re all seeking to avoid. Some have even suggested that the humanitarian crisis surrounding the Syrian Civil War could actually be made worse as a result of even targeted U.S. strikes. In the end, then the President’s proposal seems fundamentally flawed, since if it’s too narrow it may not deter Assad’s further use of chemical weapons. But if it’s too broad, it risks jeopardizing the security of these same stockpiles, potentially putting them into the hands of extremists.

“And that’s why I think we’re compelled in this case to apply a more traditional standard on whether to proceed with a use of force, one that asks a simple question: does Assad’s use of chemical weapons pose a threat to the vital national security interests of the United States? And the answer to that question is fairly obvious: even the President himself says it doesn’t.

“Now, one could argue, as I’ve suggested, that there is an important national security concern at play, that we have a very strong interest in preserving the credibility of our Commander in Chief, regardless of the party in power, and in giving him the political support that reinforces that credibility. This is an issue that I take very seriously. It’s the main reason I’ve wanted to take my time in making a final decision.

“But ultimately, I’ve concluded that being credible on Syria requires presenting a credible response, and having a credible strategy. And for all the reasons I’ve indicated, this proposal just doesn’t pass muster.

“Indeed, if through this limited strike the President’s credibility is not restored, because Assad uses chemical weapons again, what then? Add new targets aimed at toppling the regime which end up jeopardizing control of these same chemical weapons stashes — allowing them to fall into the hands of Al Qaeda or others intent on using them against the United States or our allies. Where would the cycle of escalation end?

“Last night, we learned about a Russian diplomatic gambit to forestall U.S. military action through a proposal to secure and eventually destroy the Syrian chemical weapons stockpile. This morning there are initial reports that suggest Syria is supportive of it. Let me remind everyone that even if this is agreed to, it’s still a long way off to reaching an agreement at the United Nations, to Syria gaining entry to the Chemical Weapons Convention, and to eventually securing, and destroying the stockpile. As we’ve seen in my own state of Kentucky, destroying chemical weapons is extremely challenging and requires a great deal of attention to detail and safety. Nonetheless, this proposal is worth exploring.

“But more broadly, and this is my larger point, this one punitive strike we’re debating could not make up for the President’s performance over the past five years. The only way — the only way — for him to achieve the credibility he seeks is by embracing the kind of serious, integrated national security plan that matches strategy to resources, capabilities to commitments, and which shows our allies around the world that the U.S. is fully engaged and ready to act at a moment’s notice in all the major areas of concern around the globe, whether it’s the Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf, or in the South China Sea. And, just as importantly, that he’s willing to invest in that strategy for the long-term.

“In Syria, a limited strike would not resolve the civil war there. Nor will it remove Assad from power. There appears to be no broader strategy to train, advise, and assist a vetted opposition group on a meaningful scale, as we did during the Cold War. What’s needed in Syria is what’s needed almost everywhere else in the world from America right now: a clear strategy and a President who is determined to carry it out.

“When it comes to Syria, our partners in the Middle East —countries like Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Israel — all of them face real consequences from instability, refugee flows or the growth of terrorist networks. Responding to this crisis requires a regional strategy and leadership. What we’ve gotten instead is an administration that seems more interested in telling us what this mission is not, rather than what it is.

“We’ve gotten the same timid, reluctant leadership that we’ve seen from this President for nearly five years.


“As I’ve said, this decision was not easy. When the President of the United States asks you to take a question like this seriously, you do so. Because just as our credibility in Syria is tied up with our credibility in places like Iran and North Korea, so too is the credibility of the Commander in Chief tied up, to a large extent, with America’s credibility in general. There’s no doubt about that. So let me repeat: I’ll stand shoulder to shoulder with this President or any other in any case where our vital national security interests are threatened, our treaty allies are attacked, or we face an imminent threat.

“As for Israel, very few people, if anyone, expect that Syria would test its readiness to respond on its own, which just goes to show you the importance of credibility on the world stage. As Prime Minister Netanyahu put it last week, the enemies of Israel have very good reason not to test its might. But the Prime Minister should know nonetheless that America stands with him.

“I have never been an isolationist. And a vote against this resolution shouldn’t be confused by anyone as a turn in that direction. But just as the most committed isolationist could be convinced of the need for intervention under the right circumstances when confronted with a threat, so too do the internationalists among us believe that all interventions are not created equal. And this proposal just does not stand up.

“So I will be voting against this resolution. A vital national security risk is clearly not at play, there are just too many unanswered questions about our long-term strategy in Syria, including the fact that this proposal is utterly detached from a wider strategy to end the civil war there, and on the specific question of deterring the use of chemical weapons, the President’s proposal appears to be based on a contradiction. Either we will strike targets that threaten the stability of the regime — something the President says he does not intend to do — or we will execute a strike so narrow as to be a mere demonstration.

“It is not enough, as General Dempsey has also noted, to simply alter the balance of military power without carefully considering what’s needed to preserve a functioning state after the fact. We cannot ignore the unintended consequences of our actions.

“But we also cannot ignore our broader obligations in the world.

“I firmly believe that the international system that was constructed on the ashes of the Second World War rests upon the stability provided by the American military, and by our commitments to our allies. It’s a necessary role that only we can continue to fulfill in the decades to come. And especially in times like this, the United States cannot afford to withdraw from the world stage. My record reflects that belief, and that commitment, regardless of which party has controlled the White House. We either choose to be dominant in the world, or we resign ourselves and our allies to the mercy of our enemies. We either defend our freedoms and our civilization, or it crumbles.

“So as we shift our military focus to the Asia Pacific, we cannot ignore our commitments to the Middle East, to stability in the Persian Gulf, to an enduring presence in Afghanistan, to hunting down the terrorists that would threaten the United States and its people. And when the Commander in Chief sets his mind to action, the world should think he believes in it. Frankly, the President didn’t exactly inspire confidence when he distanced himself from his own red lines in Stockholm last week.

“It is long past time this President drops the pose of the reluctant warrior — and lead. You can’t build an effective foreign policy on the vilification of your predecessor alone. At some point, you have to take responsibility for your own actions, and see the world the way it is, not the way you’d liked it to be.

“If you wish to engage countries that have been hostile, so be it. But be a realist. Know the limits of rhetoric, and prepare for the worst.

“For too long, this President has put his faith in the power of his own rhetoric to change the minds of America’s enemies. For too long, he’s been more interested in showing the world that America is somehow different now than it has been in the past. It’s humbler. It isn’t interested in meddling in the affairs of others or in shaping events.

“But in his eagerness to turn the page, he’s blinded himself to worrisome trends and developments from Tunisia to Damascus to Tehran, and in countless places in between.

“A year ago this month, four Americans were senselessly murdered on sovereign U.S. territory in Benghazi. And just last month, the President ordered the closing of more than two-dozen diplomatic posts stretching from West Africa to the Bay of Bengal. As I’ve indicated, and as the decision to close these embassies clearly shows, the terrorist threat is real. Expressions of anti-Americanism are rampant throughout Africa and the Middle East, even more so now perhaps than when the President first took office.

“So the President’s new approach has clearly come with a cost. And for the sake of our own security and that of our allies, it’s time he recognized it. Because if America doesn’t meet its international commitments, who will? That’s one question that those on the Left who are comfortable with a weakened America can’t answer, because the answer is too frightening.

“No one will.

“If this episode has shown us anything, it’s that the time has come for the President to finally acknowledge that there’s no substitute for American might. It is time for America to lead again, this time from the front. But we need strategic vision, in the Middle East and in many other places around the world, to do it.”

Comments (81)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. scrivenerNP

    Sept. 10, 2013
    11:30 a.m.

    The hypocrisy of administration officials is palpable, given that U.S. Cyber Command is assaulting untold thousands of Americans — extrajudicially branded as “dissidents” or “undesirables” — with a celltower electromagnetic radio frequency neuroweapon deployed everywhere in America. This virtual Auschwitz, hiding in plain sight, makes the United States of America a war criminal nation: veteran mainstream journalist.

  2. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    7:39 a.m.

    Some really interesting details you have written.Aided me a lot, just what I was searching for : D.

  3. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    2:10 p.m.

    I genuinely enjoy reading on this website, it has good articles. “And all the winds go sighing, For sweet things dying.” by Christina Georgina Rossetti.

  4. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    3:42 a.m.

    Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your web site in internet explorer, would check this… IE still is the market leader and a large portion of people will miss your fantastic writing due to this problem.

  5. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    7:25 a.m.

    This design is wicked! You obviously know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Wonderful job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  6. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:47 p.m.

    I am perpetually thought about this, thanks for putting up.

  7. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    10:24 a.m.

  8. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    2:19 a.m.

    Greetings! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when browsing from my apple iphone. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to fix this problem. If you have any recommendations, please share. With thanks!

  9. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    4:41 a.m.

    I will right away grab your rss as I can not find your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Kindly let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  10. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    11:20 p.m.

    Currently it looks like WordPress is the top blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  11. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    2:55 a.m.

    I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back in the future. Many thanks

  12. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    4:06 a.m.

    I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.

  13. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    7:50 a.m.

    Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your web site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task..

  14. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    4:04 p.m.

    I have not checked in here for a while as I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I will add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

  15. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    7:29 p.m.

    As I web site possessor I believe the content material here is rattling great , appreciate it for your hard work. You should keep it up forever! Best of luck.

  16. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    4:04 p.m.

    I will right away clutch your rss as I can’t in finding your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know so that I may subscribe. Thanks.

  17. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    7:27 p.m.

    I was studying some of your articles on this website and I think this internet site is real instructive! Retain posting.

  18. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    8:45 a.m.

    When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Many thanks!

  19. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    2:24 p.m.

    I’ve been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this web site. Reading this info So i’m happy to convey that I’ve an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed. I most certainly will make sure to don’t forget this website and give it a look regularly.

  20. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    7:42 p.m.

    I got what you mean , thanks for posting.Woh I am lucky to find this website through google.

  21. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    11:38 a.m.

    Very nice info and right to the point. I am not sure if this is really the best place to ask but do you people have any thoughts on where to hire some professional writers? Thank you :)

  22. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    1:28 p.m.

    Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your web-site is so cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the information I already searched everywhere and just could not come across. What a great site.

  23. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    3:55 p.m.

    you are actually a good webmaster. The site loading pace is amazing. It sort of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a magnificent job in this matter!

  24. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    1:12 p.m.

    I’m really loving the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility issues? A couple of my blog readers have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari. Do you have any advice to help fix this problem?

  25. Anonymous

    Aug. 2, 2015
    4:58 p.m.

    My programmer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on a variety of websites for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  26. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    1:37 a.m.

    hello there and thanks in your information – I’ve definitely picked up anything new from proper here. I did then again expertise several technical issues using this website, since I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I may get it to load correctly. I were brooding about if your web hosting is OK? Now not that I’m complaining, however sluggish loading instances occasions will sometimes impact your placement in google and can damage your high quality rating if advertising and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Well I am including this RSS to my email and could look out for much extra of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you replace this again soon..

  27. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    8:43 a.m.

    Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share. Kudos!

  28. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    8:53 a.m.

    I’m really impressed along with your writing skills as smartly as with the structure on your weblog. Is this a paid topic or did you customize it your self? Either way keep up the excellent high quality writing, it’s uncommon to see a nice weblog like this one nowadays..

  29. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    9:08 p.m.

    What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It positively useful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & aid different users like its helped me. Great job.

  30. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    9:28 p.m.

    You are my intake, I own few blogs and rarely run out from to brand.

  31. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    9:48 p.m.

    Good blog! I really love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I’m wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I’ve subscribed to your RSS which must do the trick! Have a nice day!

  32. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    2:39 p.m.

    Rattling great info can be found on web blog.

  33. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    4:08 p.m.

    Hiya, I am really glad I have found this information. Today bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is really annoying. A good website with interesting content, that is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can’t find it.

  34. Anonymous

    Aug. 18, 2015
    1:05 a.m.

    Hi, just required you to know I he added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your layout. But seriously, I believe your internet site has 1 in the freshest theme I??ve came across. It extremely helps make reading your blog significantly easier.

  35. Anonymous

    Aug. 24, 2015
    6:11 a.m.

    You actually make it appear so easy with your presentation however I to find this topic to be actually one thing which I feel I would never understand. It sort of feels too complex and extremely huge for me. I am looking forward in your next publish, I’ll attempt to get the grasp of it!

  36. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    8:12 a.m.

    Excellent site you have here but I was curious if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really like to be a part of community where I can get feedback from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Thanks a lot!

  37. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    2:42 p.m.

    I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or blog posts in this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i’m glad to show that I have a very good uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed. I so much surely will make certain to do not omit this website and give it a look regularly.

  38. Anonymous

    Aug. 26, 2015
    2:50 a.m.

    I like this internet site because so much utile stuff on here : D.

  39. Anonymous

    Aug. 29, 2015
    9 p.m.

    Hello! I’ve been reading your blog for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Huffman Texas! Just wanted to say keep up the excellent work!

  40. Anonymous

    Aug. 30, 2015
    12:05 a.m.

    Thankyou for this tremendous post, I am glad I noticed this site on yahoo.

  41. Anonymous

    Sept. 1, 2015
    6:10 p.m.

    Very interesting subject , appreciate it for posting.

  42. Anonymous

    Sept. 2, 2015
    3:08 a.m.

    I am typically to blogging and i really respect your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your website and preserve checking for brand spanking new information.

  43. Anonymous

    Sept. 3, 2015
    9:15 a.m.

    kqIR6Q Only a smiling visitor here to share the love (:, btw outstanding layout. Individuals may form communities, but it is institutions alone that can create a nation. by Benjamin Disraeli.

  44. Anonymous

    Sept. 7, 2015
    4:09 p.m.

    Hello, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, awesome blog!

  45. Anonymous

    Sept. 7, 2015
    6:43 p.m.

    Thanks , I have recently been searching for info about this subject for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

  46. Anonymous

    Sept. 7, 2015
    10:46 p.m.

    Hey there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  47. Anonymous

    Sept. 8, 2015
    6:25 a.m.

    Thanks for another informative web site. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I have a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

  48. Anonymous

    Sept. 13, 2015
    3:19 a.m.

    I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

  49. Anonymous

    Sept. 13, 2015
    9:30 a.m.

    Simply wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your post is simply nice and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

  50. Anonymous

    Sept. 13, 2015
    11:21 a.m.

    You are my intake, I have few blogs and infrequently run out from to post .

  51. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    2:33 a.m.

    Thanks for ones marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed reading it, you’re a great author.I will make certain to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back in the foreseeable future. I want to encourage you to continue your great job, have a nice weekend!

  52. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    6:25 a.m.

    I like this web site because so much useful stuff on here : D.

  53. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    6:42 a.m.

    It¦s actually a great and helpful piece of information. I¦m happy that you shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

  54. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    11:28 a.m.

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  55. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    11:47 a.m.

    Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve truly loved browsing your weblog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing in your rss feed and I hope you write once more very soon!

  56. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    6:14 p.m.

    It’s arduous to search out educated folks on this topic, however you sound like you recognize what you’re talking about! Thanks

  57. what is primerica about

    Sept. 19, 2015
    5:55 p.m.

    Make sure you described this totally, because I wish to get more details.

  58. federated national rating

    Sept. 19, 2015
    6:33 p.m.

    Thanks for great info, I will you use it for my review!

  59. my hanover policy

    Sept. 19, 2015
    7:54 p.m.

    Whats amazing post here. I will turn attention on your description.

  60. cheap car insurance rates

    Sept. 19, 2015
    7:58 p.m.

    Make sure you described this totally, because I wish to get more details.

  61. esurance insurance

    Sept. 20, 2015
    6:36 a.m.

    Try discounts up to 40 percent on auto or home insurance, get quotes by zip code from top insurance companies.

  62. esurance life insurance

    Sept. 20, 2015
    6:48 a.m.

    Make sure you described this totally, because I wish to get more details.

  63. car insurance quotes

    Sept. 20, 2015
    10:21 a.m.

    Whats amazing note here. It would be great to use your info for future posts or comments.

  64. statefarm auto insurance

    Sept. 20, 2015
    5:06 p.m.

    Thanks for the best info posted here.. Just waiting for update.

  65. amica insurance review

    Sept. 21, 2015
    4:21 p.m.

    Thanks for the best info posted here.. Just waiting for update.

  66. amica life insurance

    Sept. 22, 2015
    3:47 p.m.

    Get quotes by zip code and save up to 505 annually.

  67. amax home insurance quotes

    Sept. 22, 2015
    5:14 p.m.

    Save more with us and online auto insurance comparison.

  68. amax insurance dallas

    Sept. 22, 2015
    5:51 p.m.

    Best quotes in the USA on auto and home insurance. Get quotes by zip code and save on policy!

  69. amax insurance san antonio

    Sept. 22, 2015
    5:58 p.m.

    Save more with us and online auto insurance comparison.

  70. federated insurance co

    Sept. 23, 2015
    5:53 a.m.

    Try discounts up to 40% on auto or home insurance.

  71. federal mutual insurance

    Sept. 23, 2015
    6:09 a.m.

    Best quotes in the USA on auto and home insurance. Get quotes by zip code and save on policy!

  72. Anonymous

    Sept. 23, 2015
    7:24 a.m.

    Magnificent web site. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to a few buddies ans additionally sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks in your effort!

  73. Anonymous

    Sept. 23, 2015
    2 p.m.

    Great wordpress blog here.. It’s hard to find quality writing like yours these days. I really appreciate people like you! take care

  74. Anonymous

    Sept. 23, 2015
    4:31 p.m.

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  75. Anonymous

    Sept. 23, 2015
    6:50 p.m.

    Normally I don’t learn post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thank you, quite great post.

  76. Anonymous

    Sept. 26, 2015
    1:20 p.m.

    Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to protect against hackers? I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any tips?

  77. Anonymous

    Sept. 28, 2015
    3:33 a.m.

    ljd446 This is one awesome article.Really thank you! Great.

  78. commercial insurance services

    Sept. 29, 2015
    5:07 p.m.

    Make you policy cheaper by getting free quotes from mutual home and auto insurance companies.

  79. omega insurance quote

    Oct. 7, 2015
    9:35 a.m.

    Compare Omega insurance quotes on auto or car policy, save time and money here!

  80. omega auto insurance

    Oct. 7, 2015
    10:21 a.m.

    Comparison of quotes on auto or home insurance. Choose rates and save more on policies.

  81. omega watch insurance

    Oct. 7, 2015
    11:01 a.m.

    Save $520 annually on auto insurance policy here.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...