Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
November 26, 2015

Military Sexual-Assault Bills Don’t Break on Party, Gender Lines

Two competing proposals on combating sexual assault in the military could cause further headaches for Democratic leaders, as lawmakers debate how best to manage what has become an epidemic culture of misconduct in the armed services.

The fight, which does not break cleanly on party or gender lines, could get more complicated as Congress inches closer to full debate of this year’s defense authorization bill.

On Thursday, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., held a news conference with Republican Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and Democrat Jon Tester of Montana, to advocate for the proposal approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. Flanked by retired female servicemembers, the senators argued that removing the chain of command from prosecuting misconduct could lead to fewer consequences for assailants in cases prosecutors find too difficult to try.

On the other side, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has pushed legislation that would remove the command structure from prosecutions completely, and her plan has picked up significant support from members of both parties.

“Sen. Gillibrand would be the first to tell you that our bill is not the status quo. It is aggressive and [makes] meaningful changes,” McCaskill said Thursday. “I’ve had to discipline prosecutors who were turning down cases because they were worried about their win-loss record. Prosecutors like to win, and a lot of these cases they think are ‘losers.’ We see instances where time after time prosecutors say ‘no’ and commanders say ‘yes.’

“Doing this is not the magic bullet,” McCaskill said of removing prosecutions from the chain of command. “Common sense will tell you if you’ve been victimized and you go back in the unit, do you think it’s more likely to get retaliation if a bunch of outside lawyers said to move forward or if a commander said to go forward. A level of protection comes to the victim because the commander has said we’re going to get to the bottom of this.”

In June, the Senate Armed Services Committee was divided over how to proceed, with a fair number of senators backing Gillibrand but a majority supporting the language put forward by Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich.

McCaskill and Ayotte defended Levin’s reforms Thursday. Gillibrand’s measure is opposed by the military’s top brass, including Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel.

The Department of Defense estimated that 26,000 incidents of sexual misconduct occurred in 2012. The staggering, though vague, numbers — the DOD does not differentiate between violent attacks and sexual harassment in these figures — have been compounded in recent months by stories of some officers in charge of sexual-assault prevention task forces being accused or charged with sexual assault themselves.

There is significant overlap between the Gillibrand bill and the measure approved by the Armed Services Committee. For example, both bills would strip commanders of the authority to dismiss sexual-assault convictions. They also would criminalize retaliation against victims who report assault, mandate dishonorable discharges or dismissals of assailants, rescind the statue of limitations in assault cases, eliminate “military character” as a consideration for disposition and provide guidance for moving the accused assailant from a unit. The committee-approved bill would allow victims to report attacks inside or outside the chain of command, but commanders would remain involved in the trying of the potential case. Many victims groups, however, have come out in support of Gillibrand’s bill.

The dramatic nature of the debate, and on a “women’s issue” that typically unites Democrats, creates a unique problem for Democratic leaders, who are also divided on which legislative recourse they prefer. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., for example, is a co-sponsor of Gillibrand’s bill, while Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat and chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, said Thursday he is still undecided.

“I am looking at both of them,” Durbin said, adding that he hoped Gillibrand would get a full-Senate vote during defense authorization act consideration no matter what.

“If it moves in the Gillibrand direction, there will be a need for investment in the judge advocate general’s corps because there will be more requests going to them rather than through the chain of command,” he continued, when asked what his responsibility might be as the top appropriator of defense funding.

When asked about McCaskill’s concerns — that prosecutors could turn down difficult cases commanders still could consider — Durbin said such thinking was part of his personal decision process on the issue.

“That’s part of it and that’s a good point. Sen. McCaskill has a unique perspective as a former prosecutor as to what is actionable, what you can bring a criminal case on. … That’s one of the elements I’m considering in terms of my position,” Durbin said.

  • Anonymous

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100 certain. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Appreciate it

  • Anonymous

    My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was totally right. This post truly made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!

  • Anonymous

    I conceive you have mentioned some very interesting details , thankyou for the post.

  • Anonymous

    I conceive you have noted some very interesting details, regards for the post.

  • Anonymous

    I precisely had to say thanks yet again. I do not know what I would have implemented without the entire tips discussed by you directly on that theme. It became a very depressing dilemma for me, however , observing a expert technique you resolved the issue made me to leap with gladness. I will be grateful for this support and hope that you really know what a great job you happen to be accomplishing educating the others with the aid of a web site. I am sure you haven’t come across any of us.

  • Anonymous

    Hello, Neat post. There is a problem with your website in internet explorer, may test this… IE still is the market chief and a good component of folks will omit your excellent writing because of this problem.

  • Anonymous

    What i don’t realize is actually how you are not actually much more well-liked than you may be now. You’re very intelligent. You realize thus significantly relating to this subject, made me personally consider it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men aren’t fascinated unless it’s one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs nice. Always maintain it up!

  • Anonymous

    Lovely just what I was looking for.Thanks to the author for taking his time on this one.

  • Anonymous

    You are my aspiration, I possess few web logs and infrequently run out from to brand.

  • Anonymous

    You have brought up a very fantastic details, regards for the post.

  • Anonymous

    Very good written article. It will be helpful to anybody who utilizes it, as well as myself. Keep doing what you are doing – i will definitely read more posts.

  • Anonymous

    Excellent read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch since I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch! “A human being has a natural desire to have more of a good thing than he needs.” by Mark Twain.


  • Anonymous

    I like what you guys are up too. Such intelligent work and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys I¦ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website :)

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...