Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 6, 2015

Murkowski Warns Alaskans Ending Filibusters Could Be Dangerous

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

A little less than a week after a Senate floor standoff on raising the debt limit, a key Republican at the center of the storm was back in her home state warning of the possibility of future Senate rules changes.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski last week had resisted efforts to make hers be the 60th vote in favor of limiting debate on suspending the debt limit, telling reporters “nobody likes to be 60.”

Murkowski appeared before the Alaska Legislature on Wednesday for a wide-ranging address, which included some discussion of the concern Democrats might do away with filibusters, allowing more liberal senators to enact legislation unpopular in Alaska.

“It may only be a matter of time before this Senate majority ends the right to filibuster legislation all together,” Murkowski said. “Think about what that might mean for us trying to keep ANWR from permanent wilderness status.”

History has shown that her example, however, cuts both ways.

The last big legislative effort related to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, in favor of opening the land to drilling, was defeated by filibuster.

That Senate floor standoff played out in December 2005, when Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, tried to tuck ANWR language in the final fiscal 2006 Defense appropriations conference report. During that debate, Stevens appeared with his famous Hulk tie.

The procedural maneuver, which ran afoul of the Senate’s rule against air-dropping material into conference reports, led to an usually personal floor exchange between Stevens and another of the Senate’s titans, West Virginia Democrat Robert C. Byrd.

“I love this man from Alaska. I do, I love him. I feel my blood in my veins is with his blood. I love him, but I love the Senate more. I came here and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and I would die upholding that oath, just as the Romans honored an oath. And I feel the same about that,” Byrd said. “I love my friend from Alaska, I say, I love him, but I cannot go down that road. I have told him so. I love him, but I love the Senate more.”

The must-pass measure fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture and the defense spending bill eventually became law without the Stevens ANWR language.

In her speech to the Alaska Legislature, Murkowski recalled the Senate’s historic role in protecting the interests of the least populous states, expressing concern that further curbs to the power of the Senate minority could make Alaska’s interests more likely to be ignored.

“All of this undermines fundamental constitutional principles. The founding fathers structured the Senate to protect the rights of states with small populations like Alaska, by giving them equal representation and protecting minority rights. Unlike the House, the Senate historically gave Alaska the same voice as California and New York,” Murkowski said. “These changes are not good for Alaska, they’re not good for the Senate and they are not good for the country.”

Comments (12)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. jack lehr

    Feb. 20, 2014
    2:41 p.m.

    How brilliant a system of government we have inherited! When the people are divided (as now) the system bogs down so no one party can dictate to the country. Senator Reid’s dismantling of this beautiful thing is short sighted and downright authoritarian. No legislation is so important that it has to be dictated NOW, and if something comes along that is so important (like war or natural disaster), I am confident the people will come together as they always have. And Please don’t start with the “Obama’s election is the will of the people” nonsense. Who represents the people more than congress?

    • EWS

      Feb. 20, 2014
      3:26 p.m.

      You should blame the party that now requires 60 votes on every piece of legislation. The fillibuster has never been more abused than the period from 2008 to now. Look it up.

      • jack lehr

        Feb. 20, 2014
        5:42 p.m.

        You say abused, I say the country is divided, and when it is, the system very sensibly clogs.

        • Bob Viering

          Feb. 20, 2014
          5:52 p.m.

          You forget, the filibuster changes were for judicial appointments and not legislation. There is some urgency to fill judicial openings.

          • jack lehr

            Feb. 20, 2014
            6:01 p.m.

            I did not forget. A president whose nominees are liberals if the prez is liberal, is to be expected. Oh, there will be arguments, but we all know that when things are running well, the prez generally has a significant effect on judicial nominees.This president is far to the left of “liberal”, hence the “clog”. Overcoming such political divergence by changing the system in a fundamental way is a matter of looking at the present and thinking it represents the whole of history. That is rarely true. The Democrats have devolved into the autocratic and corrupt thing they used to despise. Hey, remember when it was the liberals who questioned authority?

  2. EWS

    Feb. 20, 2014
    3:24 p.m.

    Show me where the word fillibuster is in the constitution. Actually it was created
    by Aaron Burr but is certainly is not part of the constitution

    • jack lehr

      Feb. 20, 2014
      5:47 p.m.

      So what? Everyone knows all parties use it. So now that Obama is in power, it is “abuse”. Not so much when Republicans are in power. Don’t be such a hypocrite. This nation has never seen such a far left authoritarian administration and we all have seen how far left administrations do around the world. It is not “extreme” to say “hey, let’s slow down a bit and think about this”, a position the “progressives” find “extreme.”

  3. Bob Viering

    Feb. 20, 2014
    5:50 p.m.

    I hope she remembers her warning if the Republicans gain the senate majority this fall. My fear is that the Republicans pushed the Democrats into ending the filibuster for certain reasons to have it be less of a shock when they eliminate it all together once they get in control.

  4. Fido Shery

    Feb. 21, 2014
    8:43 p.m.

    Since free markets reward us for the usefulness of our actions, they are incompatible with merit-based systems of subjective judgement.

  5. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    3:56 a.m.

    Sweet web site, super pattern, really clean and use friendly.

  6. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    11:38 a.m.

    Good post. I be taught one thing tougher on completely different blogs everyday. It would at all times be stimulating to learn content from different writers and practice a bit something from their store. I’d favor to make use of some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a hyperlink in your net blog. Thanks for sharing.

  7. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    3:21 p.m.

    Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. was truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...