Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 1, 2015

New Iran Sanctions Would Show ‘Bad Faith,’ Carney Says

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

The White House on Tuesday reiterated opposition to any new sanctions against Iran related to the country’s nuclear program, even conditional sanctions that wouldn’t take effect for six months.

It’s a move that could put the kibosh on an attempt by top Senate Democrats to push new restrictions on the country.

“We strongly believe that passing new sanctions now will result in our international partners, as well as Iran, seeing us as having negotiated that agreement in bad faith, which would then have a bearing on our core sanctions architecture,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said. “The sanctions regime that [Congress] helped us build has provided this opportunity. It has succeeded in the sense that the sanctions were designed to pressure Tehran into changing its behavior, and because of the impact of the sanctions, Tehran has changed its behavior — or indicated that it is willing to change its behavior.”

Carney declined to specifically issue a blanket veto threat, noting there was no Statement of Administration Policy to announce.

That’s no surprise, because there’s no legislation yet. However, Foreign Relations Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and like-minded senators in both parties appear to be coalescing around an additional sanctions regime that would take effect in six months if subsequent conversations between the P5+1 countries and Iran fail to yield results.

On the Democratic side, the group favoring that idea includes No. 3. Democrat Charles E. Schumer of New York, though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has been noticeably more circumspect.

“I hope the negotiations succeed. They’re important. I worry that what we’re giving is not proportional to what we’re getting. I worry about a diminution of sanctions. It’s sanctions that brought the Iranians to the table,” Schumer said in an interview with the New Republic, according to an edited transcript. “They are effective by all accounts. Part of sanctions is the actual economic bite that occurs. But another part is the psychological fear that they will get worse.”

Menendez argued during an appearance Sunday on CBS News “Face the Nation,”that his proposal was “responsible” and would help the president negotiate a better result with Iran.

“It seems to me that prospectively looking for sanctions that are invoked six months from the date of enactment — they give the president certain waivers — therefore creates the flexibility for diplomacy, also sends a message to Iran, as it has throughout this process, that there is a consequence if you don’t strike a successful deal and puts us in a position of having the insurance to have additional sanctions go into effect at that time, and at the same time gives the administration the flexibility to negotiate,” Menendez said on CBS. “So I think that’s a very responsible position.”

But the Obama administration clearly wants the Senate to stand down from any new legislative effort.

“Our belief is that if sanctions were passed now, even with a delayed trigger, that it would undermine the core sanctions regime and would potentially undermine the negotiations,” Carney said. “If you want to resolve this peacefully, we need to test whether or not Tehran is willing to do what it takes, and to make the — commitments necessary to resolve this peacefully, and the only way we can do that.”

“We believe that Congress should hold in reserve … the option of passing new sanctions if the moment arises when Iran has failed to comply with its agreement, and that taking that action would have a positive result,” Carney said.

Appearing on CBS with Menendez, Foreign Relations ranking member Bob Corker said he didn’t expect the Iranian government to make any provocative moves in the immediate future.

“I think they’re going to be good actors over the next six months. Because they see an administration who led this negotiation, an administration that has already given tilt to allowing them to do the things that the world community, through the U.N. Security Council, has already said they cannot do. So I’m very discouraged,” the Tennessee Republican said.

Comments (22)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Thomas Aquinas

    Dec. 4, 2013
    2:07 a.m.

    In this article we find more evidence of Hussein Obama’s vicious war against the 1st Amendment:

  2. Isahiah62

    Dec. 4, 2013
    4:11 p.m.

    even HAIRY REED sees this: what we’re giving is not proportional to what we’re getting.

    HELLO AMERICANS time to remove the Muslim lovers in Obummer admin

  3. Change Iran Now

    Dec. 5, 2013
    10:13 p.m.

    Again, the Iranian regime has been brought to the table because of sanctions. No we’re going to give the Iranians a $6 billion payday for simply being polite? No amount of hopeful talk can alter the very basic and fundamental forces at work in Iran. As a religious government, Iran is driven by its core Shiite philosophy and convictions as it battles Sunni-led nations for regional supremacy. Unfortunately there is no separation of church and state in Iran. The mosque IS the state. Imagine if you will, if the US was a religious government led by hardline Christian
    conservatives and all members of Congress had to be members of the church and the President of the US answered to the head of the church. You don’t think the rest of the world would be alarmed? Why is Iran’s form of government deserving then of our unqualified support in this agreement?

  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    5:01 a.m.

    Some truly nice and utilitarian information on this web site, likewise I conceive the style and design holds excellent features.

  5. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    1:28 p.m.

    I am glad to be one of the visitors on this outstanding site (:, thankyou for posting.

  6. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    3:52 a.m.

    Lovely site! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am bookmarking your feeds also.

  7. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    9:51 a.m.

    Can I simply say what a aid to seek out someone who really is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know easy methods to deliver a problem to gentle and make it important. More folks have to learn this and understand this side of the story. I cant imagine youre no more well-liked because you undoubtedly have the gift.

  8. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    9:38 p.m.

    Would love to incessantly get updated great website! .

  9. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    6:01 a.m.

    Lovely just what I was searching for.Thanks to the author for taking his time on this one.

  10. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    1:35 p.m.

    Hello There. I found your weblog the use of msn. That is a very neatly written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to learn more of your useful info. Thank you for the post. I’ll certainly comeback.

  11. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    2:16 a.m.

    This web site is really a walk-through for all of the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll definitely discover it.

  12. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    3:49 a.m.

    You have noted very interesting details! ps decent web site.

  13. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    1:37 a.m.

    Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the internet the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  14. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    7:28 a.m.

    An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

  15. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    6:27 a.m.

    I have been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this site. Thank you, I will try and check back more often. How frequently you update your website?

  16. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    6:10 p.m.

    WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …

  17. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    9:49 p.m.

    I genuinely enjoy examining on this site, it has superb posts. “It is easy to be nice, even to an enemy – from lack of character.” by Dag Hammarskjld.

  18. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    5:48 a.m.

    I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are but definitely you’re going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already ;) Cheers!

  19. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:11 p.m.

    Hey There. I found your blog using msn. That is a very neatly written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your helpful info. Thank you for the post. I will definitely return.

  20. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    9:41 p.m.

    Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  21. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    7:15 p.m.

    What¦s Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve discovered It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & assist different customers like its aided me. Great job.

  22. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    4:32 p.m.

    Wow, marvelous weblog format! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you made blogging glance easy. The overall glance of your web site is wonderful, let alone the content material!

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...