Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
October 4, 2015

‘Nuclear Option’ Talk Heats Up After Another Filibuster

Democratic leaders are again taking the temperature of their caucus on whether to finally go “nuclear” and change the Senate rules after Republicans blocked another judge Monday night, aides said.

Conversation about the “nuclear option” between leaders and the rank and file began as members trickled back into town before a failed 53-38 cloture vote on the nomination of Robert L. Wilkins to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Though Democrats have threatened to change Senate rules on multiple occasions this Congress — and have yet to blow up procedure to remove the 60-vote hurdle for nominees — talking about rules change again would at a minimum appease frustrated progressive members and, at its most dramatic, alter the way the Senate does business.

After the vote, Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., a top proponent of changing the rules, released a pointed statement urging leaders to consider moving forward.

“When will we say enough is enough? Repeatedly over the past month, a minority of Senators has blocked qualified nominees by abusing the Senate rules. The rules on nominees are not working, and we need to change them,” Merkley said in the statement. “This court will rule on the critical protections that we put in place to protect hard working families from the predatory practices of Wall Street. We cannot let a minority of Senators block qualified nominees and endanger the important reforms that have been put in place to protect Oregon families.”

President Barack Obama also released a statement after the vote, decrying Senate Republicans for obstructionism (although it’s worth noting that Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voted with Democrats.)

“When it comes to judicial nominations, I am fulfilling my constitutional responsibility, but Congress is not. Instead, Senate Republicans are standing in the way of a fully-functioning judiciary that serves the American people,” Obama said. “The American people and our judicial system deserve better. A majority of the United States Senate supports these three extraordinary nominees, and it is time for simple yes-or-no votes without further obstruction or delay.”

The question is how to get that up-or-down vote Obama is demanding without a rules change. And in recent weeks, Democrats certainly have been ramping up their PR efforts to build political support for enacting such a change.

Last week, Democratic senators held a news conference decrying GOP obstruction on D.C. circuit nominees on the basis of gender. And on Monday night, a pair of senators joined members of the Congressional Black Caucus to highlight minority appointees — such as Wilkins and Federal Housing Finance Agency nominee Rep. Melvin Watt, D-N.C. — who have been blocked.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has filed separate motions to reconsider each of the three failed D.C. circuit nominees, but for some Democrats who see the political writing on the wall — that 60 votes will be impossible to attain – that might not be enough.

“I am very hopeful that Sen. Reid will be able to get … these votes on the floor so that they can be voted up-or-down, but I think we have a constitutional responsibility, particularly with judges, to vote on the nominations of the president,” Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin said at the CBC news conference.

Cardin declined to respond directly when asked what Reid’s next move might be.

“You’d have to ask Sen. Reid that question,” Cardin said.

Niels Lesniewski contributed to this report.

Comments (22)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. phillygirl

    Nov. 18, 2013
    11:49 p.m.

    I think Pat Leahy has come to Jesus. So it’s Carl Levin and who else? I want names.

  2. jackbenimble333

    Nov. 19, 2013
    3:11 p.m.

    Given the status of Obamacare and the corresponding pummeling Democrats are taking in the polls, all 14 Democrat incumbents up for re-election in 2014 are in trouble. Republicans only need to capture 6 of those seats to control the Senate. Max Baucus’ seat in Montana is pretty much a gimme so the Republicans really only need to win 5 races. The Republicans are probably hoping and praying that Democrats will invoke the nuclear option. It would be a dangerous move for Democrats. If the Republicans gain control of the Senate and Democrats have stripped themselves of the ability to use the filibuster, Obama’s last two years would devolve into a miserable veto fest.

  3. Liberalism is Nonsense

    Nov. 19, 2013
    3:18 p.m.

    Despite seductive illusions and promises of equality, the spoils of collectivism’s plunder are practically available only to the collective’s masters.

  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    6:52 a.m.

    I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But want to remark on some general things, The site style is great, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers

  5. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    2:28 p.m.

    Woh I love your posts, saved to favorites! .

  6. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    6:25 a.m.

    I am not positive where you are getting your information, however good topic. I needs to spend a while learning more or understanding more. Thank you for magnificent information I used to be on the lookout for this information for my mission.

  7. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    11:04 a.m.

    What’s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely helpful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to contribute & aid other users like its aided me. Good job.

  8. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    8:05 p.m.

    I have read several good stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how much effort you put to create such a great informative site.

  9. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    9:25 a.m.

    I really like your writing style, good information, thanks for posting : D.

  10. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    5:23 a.m.

    With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement. Do you know any ways to help reduce content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  11. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    4:25 p.m.

    Thank you for some other informative blog. Where else may just I am getting that kind of info written in such a perfect means? I’ve a project that I am just now operating on, and I have been at the glance out for such info.

  12. Anonymous

    July 31, 2015
    11:05 a.m.

    I respect your work, appreciate it for all the informative blog posts.

  13. Anonymous

    Aug. 6, 2015
    10:09 a.m.

    whoah this weblog is great i love reading your articles. Keep up the good paintings! You already know, many individuals are looking round for this info, you could help them greatly.

  14. Anonymous

    Sept. 2, 2015
    11:10 p.m.

    rVp7Lj There may be noticeably a bundle to find out about this. I assume you made sure nice points in features also.

  15. Anonymous

    Sept. 3, 2015
    2:12 a.m.

    hey there and thank you for your info – I have definitely picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical issues using this web site, since I experienced to reload the web site a lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and can damage your quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more of your respective interesting content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

  16. Anonymous

    Sept. 7, 2015
    6:39 p.m.

    I am impressed with this internet site, rattling I am a fan.

  17. Anonymous

    Sept. 8, 2015
    6:50 a.m.

    Hi would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you suggest a good hosting provider at a honest price? Kudos, I appreciate it!

  18. Anonymous

    Sept. 13, 2015
    3 a.m.

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  19. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    6:02 a.m.

    I genuinely prize your work, Great post.

  20. Anonymous

    Sept. 17, 2015
    8:28 a.m.

    Valuable information. Lucky me I found your site by accident, and I’m shocked why this accident didn’t happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

  21. So Mani

    Sept. 28, 2015
    9:54 p.m.

    This site is very awesome, just what i was looking for to check out on my time out. Thanks Again

  22. Eduardo Durke

    Sept. 29, 2015
    6:23 a.m.

    This post is very inexplicable, just what i was looking for to go through on my time out. Thanks Again

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...