Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 30, 2015

Obama Redoubles Push Against Iran Sanctions Bill

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

The Iran sanctions push pits several members of top Democratic leadership, such as Schumer, against the president. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

The White House’s campaign to keep Congress from messing with its carefully constructed talks with Iran over its nuclear program have stepped into overdrive after support for a new round of sanctions threatens to reach veto-proof majorities.

On Monday, Press Secretary Jay Carney repeatedly advised Congress against acting now — one day after President Barack Obama declared he would veto a sanctions bill while announcing the latest agreement with Iran on interim steps to limit its nuclear program. Carney had earlier said that Obama would veto the sanctions bill, but that hasn’t stopped backers from pushing forward.

Carney called legislation unnecessary because Congress could act very quickly to impose new sanctions if talks fall apart.

“We’re very confident Tehran understands that failure to abide by its commitments in the implementation agreement or failure to reach comprehensive resolution would result in action by the United States and by the international community,” Carney said.

The Iran sanctions push pits several members of top Democratic leadership — notably Sen. Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat, and Foreign Relations Chairman Robert Menendez of New Jersey — against the president, creating a particularly tense and unusual situation for Obama. The White House is more accustomed to knocking down House opposition while relying on a friendly Senate as its backstop.

So far, the bill, which would impose new sanctions against Iran if it does not reach a comprehensive nuclear deal, remains effectively in Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s legislative closet, and aides suggest the Nevada Democrat will keep it there for now.

“There is not a big clamor for a vote” at the moment, said a senior Democratic aide, who noted that while many senators have voiced support for the bill, not all of them are all demanding immediate action.

Another senior aide predicted last week that the bill wouldn’t come up anytime soon and denied a CNN report that it could come up the week of the president’s State of the Union address.

Reid at one point last year said the Senate would address the issue, only to apparently change his mind and move to other matters instead. The House already passed additional Iran sanctions last year, leaving the Senate as the president’s backstop.

The administration is desperate to keep it that way, repeatedly warning of disaster if Congress interferes with the delicate talks.

“Why would you put all of that progress at risk to pass a sanctions bill that the administration is not asking for and that risks dividing the international community?” a senior administration official asked reporters over the weekend as the administration announced the latest agreement. “Because in fact, not only do we think that a new sanctions bill could derail these talks. Ultimately, a new sanctions bill could undermine the sanctions regime that we have built so meticulously over the course of the last several years, because, essentially, if the talks are derailed by new U.S. unilateral sanctions, Iran would take that case to the international community and seek to create divisions in the international community.”

In addition to the fear of a broader diplomatic disaster, a congressional smack down of Obama on foreign policy — an area where presidents usually have primary authority — would damage the institution more generally and hurt his ability to negotiate any number of other international deals.

Then there is the other fear in the White House — that the collapse of talks could lead to a costly war.

“Frankly, this is our opportunity to achieve a peaceful resolution to this issue,” the senior official warned. “And because of that opportunity, Congress should not take action that closes the door on diplomacy.”

But doubts remain within Congress about Iran, some of our international partners and even the administration’s own eagerness to cut a deal.

And some on Capitol Hill believe that congressional saber-rattling will give Obama leverage in the talks — even if the new proposals never come to a vote.

But the administration official dismissed the idea that actually voting on more sanctions would help.

“Nobody doubts that Congress could move in a nanosecond to impose additional sanctions if Iran doesn’t comply with the agreement or if we aren’t able to negotiate an agreement during the course of negotiation. So the leverage is already there,” the official said.

Carney declined, when asked by a reporter Monday, to characterize the talks as a “good cop, bad cop” situation with Congress helpfully playing “bad cop.”

Humberto Sanchez contributed to this report.

Comments (16)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Laura Davis

    Jan. 13, 2014
    6:16 p.m.

    5­&nbspweаks-аgօ­&nbspmy­&nbspfrіeոd­&nbspgօt­&nbspраіd­&nbsp$7507­&nbspрսttіոg­&nbspіո ­&nbspsіxteeո­&nbspհօսrs­&nbspа­&nbspweek­&nbspfrօm­&nbspհօme­&nbspаոd ­&nbsptհeіr­&nbspbest­&nbspfrіeոd’s­&nbspmօm`s­&nbspոeіgհbօսr­&nbspwаs ­&nbspdօіոg­&nbsptհіs­&nbspfօr­&nbsp7-mօոtհs­&nbspаոd­&nbspbrօgհt­&nbspіո­&nbspmօre­&nbsptհаո­&nbsp$7507­&nbsp раrt­&nbsptіme­&nbspаt­&nbsptհeіr­&nbsplаbtօр.­&nbspfօllօw­&nbsptհe­&nbsptірs ­&nbspfrօm­&nbsptհіs­&nbspsіte,…&nbspWW&#x57&#46Googleproject2014getactivityreceipt&#x2E&#113&#114&#46&#x6E&#x65&#x74&#47&#109&#x4Bl&#x6A/

    �☭☭☭☭ ☭☭☭☭☭�☭ ☭☭☭☭ ☭☭☭Carney called legislation unnecessary because Congress could act very quickly to impose new sanctions if talks fall apart.

  2. Sgt Maj

    Jan. 14, 2014
    9:42 a.m.

    The moment Americans start believing anything Carney says as the shill of the Chicago thug – – or to believe that Chuckie Schemer would do anything to cross his messiah in the White House – – we are truly sunk.
    Nobama and Kerry are out to sign a pact that puts Israel in harm’s way and threatens Jews everywhere. Schemer is a two-faced con artist who would sooner follow his political leader than stick up for his own people.
    Send the thug back to Chicago and let’s take back our country with a majority of Republicans in the Senate!

  3. Defend The Constitution

    Jan. 15, 2014
    12:43 a.m.

    In related news, we find a brief overview of Hussein Obama’s sympathies for the foreign ideology proffered by Islamists: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVCDUTlo0sg&feature=youtu.be&t=1m18s

  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    5:31 a.m.

    Whats Taking place i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have discovered It absolutely helpful and it has aided me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & aid different users like its helped me. Great job.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  5. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    11:57 a.m.

    Hi my friend! I wish to say that this post is amazing, nice written and include approximately all vital infos. I’d like to see more posts like this.

    http://www.furtdsolinopv.com/

  6. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    9:30 a.m.

    I haven?¦t checked in here for some time since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I?¦ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  7. Anonymous

    July 8, 2015
    12:02 a.m.

  8. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    10 a.m.

    I together with my pals have been following the good guidelines on your web blog while unexpectedly came up with a horrible feeling I had not expressed respect to the website owner for those techniques. These men are already certainly thrilled to read through all of them and already have certainly been having fun with them. Appreciation for turning out to be so kind and for pick out this kind of extraordinary themes millions of individuals are really needing to understand about. Our sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to earlier.

    http://despedidasdesolteraz.weebly.com/blog

  9. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    3:33 p.m.

    It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate to this superb blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon!

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  10. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    7:29 a.m.

    good post.Ne’er knew this, appreciate it for letting me know.

    https://www.udemy.com/u/jeremiah-cook/

  11. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    12:40 p.m.

    Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

    http://split.us

  12. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    1:51 p.m.

    Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clearness in your post is simply cool and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the enjoyable work.

    http://split.us

  13. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    5:52 p.m.

    Lovely just what I was searching for.Thanks to the author for taking his clock time on this one.

    https://bestplumbers.com

  14. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    5:12 a.m.

    Utterly pent subject material, thank you for entropy. “No human thing is of serious importance.” by Plato.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  15. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    8:54 a.m.

    With havin so much written content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any methods to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d definitely appreciate it.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  16. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    9:23 p.m.

    I was curious if you ever thought of changing the page layout of your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better?

    https://challengepost.com/vacuum38chord

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...