Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
June 30, 2015

Rand Paul Holding Up Tax Treaties With Switzerland, Other Countries

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Sen. Rand Paul is blocking quick action on a number of tax treaties, including with Switzerland, citing concerns about the privacy rights of Americans with foreign bank accounts.

“To be clear, I certainly do not condone tax cheats, but I can’t support a law that endangers regular foreign investment and punishes every American in pursuit of a few tax cheats. Most importantly I cannot support a bulk collection tax treaty that has complete disregard for the important protections provided to every American by the Fourth Amendment,” the Kentucky Republican wrote in a letter sent today to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Paul announced formally that he would object to any unanimous consent request or other expedited consideration of consenting to ratification of several tax treaties, which the Foreign Relations panel backed on April 1.

The Constitution requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting for adoption of resolutions of ratification. When the Senate consents to noncontroversial treaties, it is customary to see Reid or his designee go through an odd sequence of standing up and sitting down to demonstrate the needed majority is present.

It’s clear that will not happen in this case, given Paul’s objection.

“Previous tax treaties were more focused on information specific to suspicions of tax fraud while requiring that serious allegations of tax wrongdoing were grounded in evidence,” Paul wrote. “However, these new bulk collection treaties demand Americans’ records under a vague standard that allows the government to access personal financial information that ‘may be relevant’ through information exchanges between the U.S. and foreign governments — a standard extended to other governments, as well.”

Treaties with Switzerland and Luxembourg are included on the list, requiring an increase in the amount of information exchanged between the countries and the United States. Other agreements involve Chile, Hungary, as well as the the Council of Europe and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Foreign Relations Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said during his panel’s consideration of the tax treaties that they were “a crucial component of U.S. trade and tax policy.”

Joanna Anderson contributed to this report.

Comments (7)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Raymon555

    May 8, 2014
    12:32 a.m.

    I just recently set myself free by learning to trade and anybody can do this as far as I’m concerned you just need to go to the right place. Check out the website Traders Superstore, just Google them you should be able to find them, these guys are really doing it right and make you wonder why everybody isn’t like them. You can make $2000 a week trading all you need to do is learn how, if I can do it anybody can.

  2. Hans Ohff

    May 8, 2014
    1:50 p.m.

    Since each infant has thousands of genes and will experience innumerable environmental variations as it develops, it is impossible to foresee anyone’s complete future potential.

  3. mikem42

    May 8, 2014
    2:39 p.m.

    How in the world can one person grind anything to a halt in a democracy. The Senate is as dysfunctional as the House with their “rules”.

    • bowman

      May 10, 2014
      10:37 a.m.

      He’s not grinding things to a halt. What he is able to do is to make the Senate go through its normal procedures for debate and voting rather than shortcutting through all of that and approving the treaties by “unanimous consent”.

      If one senator objects to setting the rules aside, the Senate cannot set the rules aside and instead must go through normal procedures.

      Unanimous consent is supposed to be for minor uncontroversial items which don’t need the full rigamarole of debate and possible amendment. Its not supposed to be used for major changes to multiple international treaties. I’m not a huge Rand Paul fan but he’s right to insist on going through the regular channels on this.

      • mikem42

        May 11, 2014
        9:15 a.m.

        Of course I didn’t mention unanimous consent, just the rules, and that is one of them that is abused. One Senator can put a hold on anything proposed, and can stop a proposed bill to even be brought to the floor for debate. He is a prime example, but not the only one who uses the “rules” to push his agenda and also to bring attention to himself. Democracy shouldn’t work that way.

  4. Gadsden Purchase

    May 9, 2014
    11:54 p.m.

    Those things which become available to most of us only become so because they were first the luxury of a few who could afford to try them.

  5. Joann Roxbury

    May 12, 2014
    9:50 a.m.

    Unlike socialist quacks, individualists searched for institutions that would voluntarily motivate individuals to unleash their potential.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...