Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 28, 2015

Reid Fumes at McConnell’s New Fondness for Majority Rules

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

Updated 11:40 p.m. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called out Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for insisting on a simple majority threshold for his amendment to block new carbon emissions regulations — while refusing to allow simple majority votes on Democratic jobs proposals.

“Unfortunately the Republican leader stalled the Senate’s progress on these appropriations bills with his recent conversion to the idea of insisting on simple majority votes,” Reid said on the Senate floor Monday.

Senior Senate Republican aides said this was just another instance of Reid seeking to protect his Democrats from voting on politically difficult amendments.

“Sen. Reid would rather kill the appropriations process than vote on this amendment,” one GOP aide said.

Their comments came as the Senate had been considering a spending package made up of the Agriculture, Transportation-HUD and Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations bills.

After voting overwhelmingly to begin consideration of the package 95 to 3 last week, talks between Reid and McConnell sputtered. Eventually, Reid moved Thursday to proceed to a bipartisan sportsmen’s bill, signaling the possible death of the appropriations package.

One major issue was a McConnell amendment that he had been planning to offer that would block the Environmental Protection Agency’s plans to implement new regulations on carbon emissions from existing power plants — primarily affecting coal.

Reid had sought to limit the scope of amendments by insisting that only germane amendments could be offered, but McConnell had assurances that his amendment would be ruled germane if challenged.

That meant that McConnell would get a 51-vote threshold on his proposal since, under Senate rules, once cloture is invoked on the package, pending germane amendments would automatically get votes at a 51-vote threshold.

So, in negotiations, McConnell dismissed any effort that would not allow a 51-vote threshold for his amendment. Democrats offered to vote on the measure separately, but at a 60-vote threshold. But McConnell rejected that idea — hence an impasse and Reid’s decision to move on to other business, according Democratic aides. A GOP aide disputed that any such offer was made.

Reid said that it was ironic that the Republican leader was insisting on a simple majority vote since McConnell had pushed so many times before on 60-vote threshold for most Senate business in recent years.

“Over the past five years virtually everything we’ve done here in the Senate has been subject to a 60-vote threshold,” Reid said. “Why? Because the Republican leader has insisted on it.”

Reid dubbed the move “the McConnell Rule, everything is 60-votes.”

Senator Reid offered McConnell a compromise. If McConnell insisted on a majority threshold for his carbon rule amendment, Reid would agree if, in turn, McConnell would consent to simple majority votes on middle-class priorities with broad support – such as pay equity, a minimum wage hike and allowing student loan to be refinanced.

A GOP aide said that the Senate routinely sets up a 60-vote threshold on contentious amendments. If Reid’s proposals were germane they too would be subject to a 51-threshold vote, like McConnell’s amendment, the aide said.

The logjam could free up floor time for other bills, including a bipartisan rewrite of the Workforce Investment Act and a bill to provide sportsmen more access to federal lands and support conservation efforts. The Senate could also take up a terrorism risk insurance bill or a bill making it more difficult for Congress to make changes to benefits under Medicare from Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark.

Comments (13)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Jack Everett

    June 23, 2014
    4:54 p.m.

    McConnell turn into a bigger ass hat everyday.

    Koch Brothers Exposed

  2. Kenneth J. Hicks

    June 23, 2014
    7:02 p.m.

    If tragedy strikes and the GOP gains control of the Senate, you can rest assured that McConnell will get rid of the 60-vote rule.

    • Outraged

      June 24, 2014
      8:26 p.m.

      I hope McConnell uses the 51 vote to overturn the ACA, just like they passed it.

  3. Rick Turner

    June 24, 2014
    9:09 a.m.

    Dirty Harry will be even madder next January when he is minority leader and has to live by the rules he has orchestrated. You have to play the hand you are dealt.


    June 24, 2014
    11:45 p.m.

    Senator Reid and the rest democratic party has WALKED AWAY from the unemployed and poor in this country.The Republican and Democratic parties have both FAILED the three million workers, and their families, without unemployment benefits since late last December. Over the past six months, these families have continued falling into financial ruin, while waiting for the extension to pass in the senate. The republicans have made every attempt to delay the senate vote, in order to render it too late to pass. The senate democrats and the president have done little to push through the extension vote, and have actually made the delay further possible to implement. When our government can give billions to the Ukraine people it has failed to give these American families the same courtesy. We can send our children to war, but not expect help for the families they leave behind. Shame on these two parties for lacking compassion, and common decency.

  5. A Semper Fi Marine

    June 26, 2014
    12:11 a.m.

    So – I’m given the choice of trusting the word of Harry or Mitch – There really is no choice here, with all the despicable lies and half truths and sneaky under-handed deals DIRTY Harry has done in his tenure – I’ll believe Mitch ANY DAY.

    Just my Take – IMHO

  6. gardenSalsa64

    June 26, 2014
    10:38 p.m.

    That collectivism unleashes evil is proven by the history of dictators claiming that the society’s well-being depends upon its subjugation.

  7. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    6:29 a.m.

    I always was interested in this topic and still am, regards for posting.

  8. Anonymous

    Aug. 12, 2015
    5:15 p.m.

    Fantastic beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend your website, how could i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me a appropriate deal. I were a little bit familiar of this your broadcast offered bright transparent concept

  9. Anonymous

    Aug. 17, 2015
    9:30 p.m.

    Thanks for the update, how can I make is so that I get an alert email every time you make a new post?

  10. Anonymous

    Aug. 19, 2015
    11:08 a.m.

    I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Keep up the superb works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my site :)

  11. Anonymous

    Aug. 24, 2015
    7:14 a.m.

    I used to be very pleased to seek out this internet-site.I needed to thanks on your time for this wonderful read!! I undoubtedly having fun with every little little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.

  12. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    1:37 p.m.

    I believe this website has got some very fantastic information for everyone : D.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...