Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 5, 2015

Reid: ‘We Don’t Have the Votes’ for Background Checks

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Tuesday that he would need to have enough votes for any gun control legislation before bringing another bill to the floor, while leaving open the option for a narrower measure than the failed background check bill from earlier this year.

“We’re going to move this up about as quickly as we can, but we’ve got to get the votes first. We don’t have the votes,” Reid told reporters in the Capitol, just a day after a mass shooting at Washington’s Navy Yard claimed the lives of 13 people, including the shooter.

The Senate could not clear a 60-vote hurdle on a background check bill in April, falling five votes short. Reid was then asked whether he could support advancing a narrower, mental-health-related measure and the majority leader indicated he wasn’t even sure there would be votes for such a bill but did not close the door to it, saying Congress should do “anything we can to help prevent” future mass shootings.

“I was asked, what about mental-health provisions, which is something we worked hard on. Sen. [Debbie] Stabenow worked really hard on that and that’s something we’ll look at, but I think to show how elementary this is … we want to stop individuals with mental illness from buying guns. We want to stop people who are felons from being able to purchase a gun. That’s what that’s all about,” Reid said, alluding to the popular-with-the-public background check provisions.

Other senators expressed a weariness about yet another mass shooting, yet a certain resignation to futility pervaded the Capitol, with lawmaker after lawmaker shrugging his shoulders at the idea of finding enough votes to pass a bill. Top Democrats Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, who chairs the committee of jurisdiction, seemed to think that Monday’s shooting did not change the Senate vote calculus. Neither did No. 2 Democrat Richard J. Durbin.

Less-battle-hardened members tried to express optimism while acknowledging the realities of a divided Congress.

“We have 55 votes in the Senate. We had more than enough to pass it if it wasn’t for a Republican filibuster,” said Sen. Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn. “I don’t know what will happen in the coming days, but Americans are not going to sit by and allow these mass shootings while we say absolute nothing here. It’s unconscionable that we sit by and do nothing in Washington as 6,000 people have died across the country since Newtown, 13 more yesterday.”

Meanwhile, Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas — one of the few Democratic nos on the original background check bill, said Tuesday he would look at the details of any proposal “when they are revealed.”

Humberto Sanchez and Niels Lesniewski contributed to this report.

Comments (6)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. YoungConservative

    Sept. 17, 2013
    3:51 p.m.

    “popular-with-the-public background check provisions”

    How do you figure? Are you looking at the Public Policy Polling (PPP) polls that are completely inaccurate? In the same poll of the Colorado recall election they found “support” for gun control, yet people voting to oust a state senator BECAUSE of gun control.

    Either way, nothing would have prevented the shooting in DC. He used a legally bought shotgun and a pistol he took off of a guard. No criminal convictions (expanded background checks do nothing here) and a common shotgun (“assault” rifle ban does nothing).

    This was the case of a mentally ill person demonstrating that, once again, gun free zones lead to mass casualties.

    • Government handouts = slavery

      Sept. 17, 2013
      4:56 p.m.

      All facts that liberal gun grabbers can’t refute.

  2. WindsurfMaui

    Sept. 17, 2013
    5:27 p.m.

    It’s obvious that background checks aren’t nearly enough. Even good men with guns were not able to stop a bad man with a gun. Each time we have an incident the innocents killed are 10 or more to 1 bad guy. This is just an unacceptable outcome.
    We need stronger mental health requirements, more testing for gun permits, very strong requirements for carry permits and a true gun registry that lists each gun sold everywhere and includes from the gun manufacturer a digital copy of shell casing and barrel striations for an easier way to pinpoint which gun was used in a crime. We have the right to own a gun but we do not have the right to commit a crime with a gun and then avoid the law. Also, all barrels including replacement barrels should carry a license number that is also in a gun registry and sold with a background check. This will be needed as 3D printers can make the exterior of guns but not the barrels.

  3. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    4:17 a.m.

    Enjoyed studying this, very good stuff, thanks. “A man does not die of love or his liver or even of old age he dies of being a man.” by Percival Arland Ussher.

  4. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    3:03 p.m.

    Some genuinely interesting details you have written.Aided me a lot, just what I was looking for : D.

  5. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    2:09 p.m.

    Hey! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having problems finding one? Thanks a lot!

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...