Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 29, 2015

Senate GOP Opposition to Budget Deal Grows

Ayotte and Graham announced opposition to the budget deal, while McCain said he's leaning in favor of it. (Douglas Graham/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Ayotte and Graham announced their opposition to the budget deal, but McCain, center, said he’s leaning in favor of it. (Douglas Graham/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Many Senate Republicans began to announce opposition Thursday to a bipartisan budget agreement — even as their House counterparts passed it — actions unlikely to imperil the deal but that will make vote counters sweat in the closing days of 2013.

Most GOP senators facing primary challengers in 2014 have either declared their opposition to the framework or are expected to do so in the coming days, which perhaps creates for them the ideal political scenario: Congress puts itself on track to avoid a shutdown by setting appropriations levels for the next two years that have bipartisan support while these Republicans get to tout their conservative bona fides in breaking with the party.

“After careful review of the agreement, I believe it will do disproportionate harm to our military retirees,” said in-cycle Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, in one of the first statements to buck the deal. “Our men and women in uniform have served admirably during some of our nation’s most troubling times. They deserve more from us in their retirement than this agreement provides.”

Graham’s been one of the most persistent GOP critics of the effect of automatic sequester cuts on the military.

The framework brokered by House Budget Chairman Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Budget Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash., includes cuts in both military and civilian pensions to offset some of the across-the-board spending cuts approved in 2011. The House passed the legislation 332-94. To avoid another government shutdown, however, appropriators will still need to draft an omnibus spending bill by Jan. 15 that gets approved by both chambers.

Graham was not alone in his dissent Thursday. Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Richard C. Shelby, R-Ala., told #WGDB they would not support the bill.

“I understand that [Ryan] was in because of what happened this fall, and also I know there were appropriators that … made it difficult,” Corker said. “I voted for the Budget Control Act back in 2011.”

“It’s the same old thing where …we’ll go ahead and spend the money now and in years nine and ten down the road we hope someone else will not,” Corker added.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who is leaning against the agreement, echoed Corker’s concern, calling it “kind of the age old spend now, save later.”

Also against the plan are Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. They released separate statements Thursday also decrying the military pension changes.

Sen. Thad Cochran, R-Miss., who just announced that he would seek another term in 2014, said that he had not decided how to vote on the agreement, but acknowledged the announced opposition of his home-state colleague.

“I do not support paying for increased federal spending on the backs of our retired and active duty troops,” Wicker said in a statement. “Congress should not change the rules in the middle of the game for those who have chosen to serve our nation in the military. We can and should do a deal without cutting the benefits of our men and women who have volunteered for a military career. The plan should be rejected.”

Ayotte, like Corker, expressed concern that Congress would be locked into a two-year agreement without setting a path for structural entitlement reform. She noted in a brief interview, however, that if negotiators had to change the pay-fors on the original Murray-Ryan deal, “I certainly would look at the agreement differently and I’d take a look at it.”

But Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who often agrees with Graham and Ayotte, was one of the rare GOP senators to tell reporters he was leaning toward supporting the measure, even though he would prefer that military pensions not be cut.

“It’s a very serious concern, but the fact is, if we shut down the government, we hurt the military very very badly… as well as fellow citizens,” McCain said, before adding that he is “leaning toward voting for it.”

It’s hard to see the deal achieving the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture without Republican appropriators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. Neither of the two moderates would commit when asked about the Ryan-Murray legislation as the House voted Thursday.

“Obviously, it’s the details that you’ve got to focus in on, and that’s what we’re doing now in the midst of all of this jack-in-the-box we’re doing,” Murkowski said, in reference to the week’s pop-up Senate floor votes on nominations.

“I’m in the process of reviewing it,” Collins said, then adding, “I think we need a budget I am concerned about the cuts in the military.”

Speaking with reporters earlier in the day, Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., noted the importance of counting votes.

“We need Republican votes to pass the budget agreement, period. We need at least five, and I’m hoping that there’ll be more than that,” Durbin said. “There are not five who Republicans have announced they’re for it, I mean to my knowledge, and I hope there are many more than that and they’re just holding back for any number of reasons.”

Comments (50)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Karen

    Dec. 13, 2013
    9:44 a.m.

    Chicken Hawk Paul Ryan guts military pensions next year, waits to 2022 to touch federal pensions. Paul Ryan has been voting yes on war for over a decade, and now he wants to steal from veterans for amnesty.

    • hacimo

      Dec. 13, 2013
      10:58 a.m.

      No amnesty!. Lets march on washington and fill the national mall with protesters if they try to force that monster through., it would destroy the country for good.

    • libglib

      Dec. 13, 2013
      11:01 a.m.

      I definitely feel for military vets. My dad was career AF. Bad deal. However, don’t think that this is the end to the threats of federal pensions just because it’s not in this budget framework. If it’s another day, there is another threat (high-5, increased contribution, total elimination, etc.).

    • PubliusNovus

      Dec. 13, 2013
      2:26 p.m.

      Ryan is certainly a chicken hawk, but he is not proposing to cut from veterans. He is proposing to cut from those who have not yet retired from active duty.

      • maodeedee

        Dec. 13, 2013
        4:47 p.m.

        Ryan is not necessarily a chicken HAWK, but he’s proved himself to be just plain Chicken-S-H-I-T and a gutless, phony, back-stabbing sell-out.

      • John

        Dec. 14, 2013
        6:07 p.m.

        Unfortunately, that is not accurate. The cuts would impact all military retirees … current or future. It does not impact Reservists for some reason nor does it impact those active retirees who took REDUX bonuses. I apparently only impacts those who did not take the REDUX bonus but still served 20 years or more. I think the problem here is these people agreed to do something with an understanding of compensation. If we as voters (or through Congress) feel that sort of “contractual” relationship only requires one side to comply, we have a problem. We definitely need to reform military pension soon. But we should not change the game on those who made agreement and kept their end. If we allow such a precedent … what will be next?

  2. Mygoodness

    Dec. 13, 2013
    9:45 a.m.

    Oh, now they need the votes of these extremist republicans. What’s wrong, they haven’t changed the rules yet to say only a majority of democrats is needed?

    • PubliusNovus

      Dec. 13, 2013
      2:37 p.m.

      No, that’s the House. But a simple majority is, after all, what the Constitution contemplated. When the Founders intended that a super-majority be required, they wrote it down. As in a 2/3s majority of both houses required to override a presidential veto. Art. I, sec. 7, cl. 2. As in conviction after impeachment. Art. I, sec. 3, cl. 5. As in ratification of treaties. Art. II, sec. 2, cl. 2. They also specified when a minority could impel action, as in 1/5 to require a roll call vote. Art. I, sec. 5, cl. 3. Everything else is a simple majority. In short, the filibuster is and always has been unconstititional.

      BTW, the original filibuster rule required a 2/3s vote to end debate. Ask yourself this. What sense does it make to have a 2/3s vote to pass a bill, when a 2/3s vote is what is specified to override a veto? If every bill required a 2/3s vote to get past the filibuster rule, then every bill would be veto-proof. So if the Founders intended a 2/3s filibuster, why did they put in the veto override provision? Yeah. Think about it.

      • Mygoodness

        Dec. 13, 2013
        2:39 p.m.

        Didn’t read the article did you.

  3. S. Strengari

    Dec. 13, 2013
    12:28 p.m.

    LOL what difference does it make at this point? Where were these tough talkers the past few years? So we have a united Senate Republican minority bloc that are impotent and so shell-shocked they are afraid of their own shadow? Love watching Graham and the rest of those snakes trying to prove their conservative street cred now! America curses at the mention of our government officials and these idiots are all smiles while they kick the can down the road AGAIN. Main Street hates the Establishment of BOTH parties!

    • PubliusNovus

      Dec. 13, 2013
      2:43 p.m.

      I guarantee that if they stopped kicking the can down the road, you would be the first one in line bltchlng about the resulting depression.

      • S. Strengari

        Dec. 13, 2013
        3:27 p.m.

        Funny already living in it.

  4. terry80

    Dec. 13, 2013
    2:06 p.m.

    who could have seen McCain supporting this?? Always taking the high road saying he has the troops backs, acknowledging this hurts troops who have already retired (as opposed to civilians where it only affects those who haven’t been hired yet)…then saying he’s going to vote for it anyway. Typical con-man! McCain, Boehner, Ryan, Pelosi, Reid, Obama: They are all hypocrites and liars!

  5. terry80

    Dec. 13, 2013
    2:13 p.m.

    McCain and other sleight-of-hand Republicans (Boehner, Ryan) offer a false choice. The choice isn’t do this or shut down the government. We got here by doing a continuing resolution, just a few weeks ago, just like the government has been funded for years. That is the real choice, do this or keep the spending caps in place. Don’t BS us like we are stupid! This is about doling out $ to buy your constituents for re-election. Same old, same old.

    Spend now, save later led to the $17 Trillion debt we have now! I have no confidence that THIS TIME it is going to work.

  6. terry80

    Dec. 13, 2013
    2:15 p.m.

    If congress really wants to help the troops and save money, then let’s get out of Afghanistan. We are spending $6.7 billion a month there. Getting out now and avoiding those costs would pay for all of the extra $63 billion spending spree…and then some.

    • evangelical

      Dec. 13, 2013
      4:58 p.m.

      We are spending 10 billion dollars a day…Afghanistan would cut approximately 200 million dollars a day

  7. PubliusNovus

    Dec. 13, 2013
    2:23 p.m.

    So Ayotte, Graham, and Wicker are NOT against the deal because it doesn’t cut enough. They are against the deal because of what it cuts–military “pensions” for those in the 40-62 age range. This is the same old, same old from the “conservatives.” They want the budget cut, but they are against any line item that is actually proposed for cutting.
    BTW, military “retirees” do not receive “pensions.” They retire from active duty on partial pay ranging from half-pay and up.

  8. HemiHead66

    Dec. 13, 2013
    4:19 p.m.

    This whole Govt. needs to be fired. We’re spending 6 x more on Defense than the next biggest Defense spender, which is China, and they’re looking to rob Social Sec. Medicare, and the pensions of our troops so they can put back those puny cuts at the Pentagon. This is about their pals pork-barrel Defense contracts. That money gets kicked back to the crony politician fund. These slobs are as corrupt as they come. Worse than the mob.

    • WhatMightBe

      Dec. 14, 2013
      12:36 a.m.

      How about 20% fraud with Social Security and Medicare is closer to 30%

      what about that???????????

  9. maodeedee

    Dec. 13, 2013
    4:42 p.m.

    Mitch McConnell said that he would vote against this abomination of House GOP Capitulation but most likely he’s only taken that position because he thought it could pass without his vote.

    And the key to understanding Quisling sell-outs like McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner and now Ryan is that If Obama is in favor of something, they can be depended upon to give it their full support in the interest of establishing one-party elitist rule and big government-run crony capitalism in America.

    Yet none dare call it Treason

  10. evangelical

    Dec. 13, 2013
    4:51 p.m.

    ******* FHUCK BOEHNER & RYAN!!! ********

    …………………./´¯/)
    ………………..,/¯../
    ………………./…./
    …………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`•¸
    ………./’/…/…./…../../¨¯
    ……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
    ……………………..’…../
    ……..………..……. _.•´
    ……………………..(
    …………..………….

    • tpaine1

      Dec. 13, 2013
      7:03 p.m.

      My congratulations. Your intellectual addition just got FLAGGED?? You’re probably going to get banned altogether. Good job!!

  11. funky321

    Dec. 13, 2013
    8:32 p.m.

    And these dirty rinos slipped a provision in that allows the bill to be passed in the Senate with a simple majority instead of 60 votes.

  12. harryjmic

    Dec. 13, 2013
    8:44 p.m.

    Maybe I can add Corker and Flake to my list of “good guys” right now all I have is Paul, Rubio, Cruz, and Lee.

  13. WhatMightBe

    Dec. 14, 2013
    12:38 a.m.

    Super – Boehner sold out the GOP in the house……

  14. tpaine1

    Dec. 14, 2013
    6:54 a.m.

    After their “cave in” during the shutdown, NOW the Senate GOP has a pair?? Little late in the game. Only thing worse than the Senate GOP is the Senate Democrats who are STILL lying about the ObamaCon Tax.

  15. Black_Saint

    Dec. 14, 2013
    8:01 a.m.

    Lindsey Graham is one of the biggest worthless piece of RINO feces in the Nation exceed only by his parder in crime John McNut!

  16. Benjamin Dover

    Dec. 14, 2013
    10:27 a.m.

    It is Harry Reid and Senate democrats who refused to compromise.

  17. Benjamin Dover

    Dec. 14, 2013
    10:27 a.m.

    Along with the courage and industry that liberty begets, competition is proven to best motivate the genius, creativity, and work ethic upon which technological advance depends.

  18. Socialism is Organized Evil

    Dec. 17, 2013
    3:56 p.m.

    Here we find ineligible usurper, Hussein Obama, lying about cutting the Federal deficit in half: http://youtu.be/6jJvkkNmR_8?t=1m29s

  19. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    7:10 p.m.

    Very interesting information!Perfect just what I was looking for! “If you could choose one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor.” by Jennifer Jones.

    http://www.furtdsolinopv.com/

  20. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:04 a.m.

    Hi my loved one! I want to say that this article is amazing, great written and include approximately all significant infos. I would like to look more posts like this .

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  21. Anonymous

    July 8, 2015
    1:13 a.m.

    I precisely had to thank you so much once again. I’m not certain the things I might have implemented without the actual ideas revealed by you over that subject. This was an absolute hard circumstance for me, nevertheless noticing your well-written tactic you resolved the issue made me to jump for fulfillment. Now i’m happier for the work and thus hope you realize what a powerful job your are carrying out teaching the others using a site. I’m certain you’ve never got to know all of us.

    http://www.aircraftmechanicwantads.com/author/RomanKzEjES

  22. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    11:31 a.m.

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

    https://duck.co/user/infoasistencia

  23. Anonymous

    July 12, 2015
    3:24 p.m.

    I like this post, enjoyed this one thank you for posting. “The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.” by Albert Einstein.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  24. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    5:06 a.m.

    Simply want to say your article is as amazing. The clearness in your put up is just great and i can suppose you’re knowledgeable on this subject. Fine together with your permission allow me to take hold of your feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thanks 1,000,000 and please carry on the rewarding work.

    http://www.lyrical-lao.com/forum/discussion/251501/good-low-cost-auto-insurance

  25. Anonymous

    July 19, 2015
    9:43 a.m.

    I have recently started a web site, the information you provide on this website has helped me greatly. Thanks for all of your time & work.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  26. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:20 a.m.

    Excellent website. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to several pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you for your sweat!

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  27. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    8:10 a.m.

    When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  28. Anonymous

    July 30, 2015
    6:40 p.m.

    You have observed very interesting details! ps nice web site. “Wisdom is the supreme part of happiness.” by Sophocles.

    http://slimcelebrity.com/plastic-surgery/plastic-surgery-cost-and-recovery-time/

  29. Anonymous

    Aug. 6, 2015
    10:47 a.m.

    I got what you intend, regards for posting.Woh I am glad to find this website through google.

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org

  30. Anonymous

    Aug. 7, 2015
    5:53 a.m.

    When I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any manner you possibly can take away me from that service? Thanks!

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org

  31. Anonymous

    Aug. 9, 2015
    6:24 p.m.

    I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future. Many thanks

    http://eblogtip.com/clickbank-university-review-cb-university-justin-allen-adam-horwitz-and-matt-hulett-8-things-you-should-know/

  32. Anonymous

    Aug. 18, 2015
    midnight

    With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright infringement? My site has a lot of unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my agreement. Do you know any techniques to help prevent content from being stolen? I’d certainly appreciate it.

    http://johnnylawrence.pets-memories.com/index.php

  33. Anonymous

    Aug. 18, 2015
    6 p.m.

    I am very happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  34. Anonymous

    Aug. 19, 2015
    10:48 a.m.

    Hey this is somewhat of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding know-how so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

    http://kamilklops.blog.com/

  35. Anonymous

    Aug. 24, 2015
    5:10 a.m.

    I truly appreciate your piece of work, Great post.

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org/primerica-insurance.html

  36. Anonymous

    Aug. 24, 2015
    3:15 p.m.

    I regard something genuinely special in this site.

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org/primerica-insurance.html

  37. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    7:08 a.m.

    There are definitely numerous details like that to take into consideration. That is a great level to convey up. I supply the thoughts above as basic inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you carry up the place the most important thing will likely be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged round things like that, but I’m sure that your job is clearly recognized as a good game. Each boys and girls feel the affect of only a second’s pleasure, for the remainder of their lives.

    http://www.leb4host.com/story.php?title=httpelfisanta-fr-9#discuss

  38. Anonymous

    Aug. 25, 2015
    12:07 p.m.

    Magnificent site. A lot of useful info here. I’m sending it to some pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you in your sweat!

    http://www.deallast.com/story.php?title=lettre-au-pere-noel-3#discuss

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...