Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 6, 2015

Aide: Democrats Offer Vote to Approve Keystone XL Pipeline — With a Catch

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Senate Democrats are offering Republicans a vote on approving the Keystone XL pipeline, but are demanding an energy efficiency bill pass in return.

Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., remained confident Monday that the Senate would vote on approving the Keystone XL pipeline regardless of the outcome of the energy bill, but a senior Democratic aide threw cold water on that idea.

“We are ready to give them a vote if they give us Shaheen-Portman,” a senior Senate Democratic aide said, referring to the energy efficiency legislation’s authors, Sens. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Rob Portman, R-Ohio.

The aide added that the deal would require enough Republican support to pass the energy efficiency bill.

“They need a way to figure out how to take yes for an answer,” the aide continued.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., compared the negotiation to a shell game.

“That’s how I feel about this Shaheen-Portman,” Reid said in a brief interview with reporters. “It keeps changing. Every night there is something new… That’s where we are.”

Reid said he believes that there are enough votes to begin debate, but that it’s unclear if Republicans will vote to end debate on the measure.

“I think we can get cloture on moving to it, but whether we can get off of it I don’t know,” Reid said.

The chamber is scheduled to vote to limit debate on proceeding to the bill on Tuesday. Hoeven said he too expects Republicans to go along with that vote to move the process along.

“I think you’ll see that we’ll vote to proceed to the bill,” he said.

Hoeven told reporters Monday that his conversations last week with Reid indicated that the chamber would move to a Keystone bill after the efficiency bill, without preconditions.

“He said that we would go to energy efficiency, and then we’ll go to Keystone,” Hoeven said.

Reid last week offered Republicans a vote on a separate bill to approve the Keystone XL pipeline the week following consideration of the efficiency legislation. But Republicans are pushing for four amendments to the bill, one of which would include language deeming the controversial pipeline approved.

Democrats argue that seeking the four amendments is the latest effort of the GOP to move the goalposts in the negotiations.

“First they wanted non-binding language, then binding language, and now it’s Keystone plus their favorite energy amendments,” the aide continued.

While Hoeven left the open the possibility that Keystone could get a vote even if the efficiency bill fails, the aide was skeptical, stressing the deal requires passage of the legislation in exchange for a vote on the pipeline.

“We’d need a path to passage,” the aide said.

The other amendments Republicans want considered include a Hoeven bill to prevent the EPA from requiring carbon capture and sequestration technology to capture greenhouse gas emissions from power plants unless certain benchmarks are met. In addition, GOP leaders want votes on a measure by Wyoming Republican John Barrasso to require the Energy Department to approve liquefied natural gas exports to all World Trade Organization countries and on a Roy Blunt, R-Mo., proposal to prevent a carbon tax.

Earlier Monday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney declined to say whether the president would veto a bill approving Keystone, although there is an assumption that he would. Keystone does not yet have 67 votes in the Senate to override a veto.

White House adviser John Podesta, who has recused himself from Keystone, pointed to Shaheen-Portman earlier Monday as an example of something Congress might be able accomplish this year on climate change. But, he noted, it has to get past a filibuster hurdle first.

As for Congress limiting on the president’s authority to impose carbon regulations? Podesta said the odds of that happening were “zero.”

Steven T. Dennis contributed to this report.

Comments (13)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Mickey Kovars

    May 5, 2014
    10:53 p.m.

    Why can’t everyone just agree to vote on the goddam pipeline, without all the extras?

    • mabramso

      May 5, 2014
      11:27 p.m.

      Because they all deem the extras as being important, and neither side trusts the other to allow votes on their side’s extras.

  2. TycheSD

    May 6, 2014
    1:24 a.m.

    Democrats should NOT pass the Blunt amendment. A carbon tax is something they should have done a long time ago!!

  3. TycheSD

    May 6, 2014
    1:25 a.m.

    And if President Obama wants to have a real legacy, he should focus on climate change and the environment – NOT IMMIGRATION!! Immigration makes climate change worse by increasing the population. Plus it’s bad for American workers.

  4. Hans Olo

    May 8, 2014
    7:09 p.m.

    There is absolutely no scientific proof that proposed solutions to man-made global-warming will actually have any impact upon the climate.

  5. Uncle Rex

    May 9, 2014
    3:11 a.m.

    The story of man-made global-warming has been conjured up to exploit the sympathies of the gullible and the ignorant.

  6. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    5:12 a.m.

    Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Very helpful info specially the last part :) I care for such information much. I was looking for this certain info for a very long time. Thank you and good luck.

  7. Anonymous

    June 29, 2015
    7:01 p.m.

    “Our earliest responses to fear are two fold,” notes Shechtman. “First, we go quiet and hope no one notices us. Second, we lash out and try to hurt others. Both are in the service of trying to stay safe. Of course and this is the irony neither response is conducive to the focus, creativity, and plain old hard work it’s going to take to pull a company through the recession.”Whoever orders books on the Internet, withdraws money from a cash machine or uses a navigation system to arrive at a destination is (usually without realizing it) using companies’ very large databases. These are accessed and managed by computer programs which depending on the type of application or search request work quite differently. Saarbrucken computer scientists have recently developed a concept for a database system that automatically adapts to different requirements and thus combines features of previously different systems.

  8. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    4:21 p.m.

    I truly appreciate your work, Great post.

  9. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    5:06 p.m.

    Cutting through the crap and misconception ever so swiftly, it deems and re names cannabis sativa “Marihuana” as a term of pure disrespect, and then outlaws all but her stalks, stems and roots, which basically means she can no longer legally grow much less strive for the maturity cycle given her she cannot grow without her leaves, and her point to grow is to produce beautifully exquisite flowers, and to procreate via her seed via the pollination of her hairs. Sativa’s siblings Indica Rudrailis were excluded and had no law ever written nor pertaining to them as did they to sativa right here bless their hearts, but they too suffered too as if there were because of the family connection, wrongful, detrimental and illegal as it was and continues to be and gotten away with.

  10. Anonymous

    July 3, 2015
    12:38 a.m.

    communications and public relations professionals – holdt sitt 氓rsm酶te i G酶teborg i fjor, var

  11. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    11:19 a.m.

    I like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and reporting! Keep up the amazing works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.

  12. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    7:10 p.m.

    for oss at de tidligste fors酶ka p氓 氓 dyrke jorda fant sted her i landet. I tillegg er det en

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...