Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 30, 2015

Senators Seek Ban on Animal Fight Attendance in Farm Bill Conference (Video)

Seventeen senators are calling on farm bill negotiators to include language making attendance at animal fights illegal.

In advance of the formal kick off of the House-Senate farm bill conference next week, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and 16 colleagues have asked the conferees to accept a provision already backed by the Senate to make it a violation of federal law to be a spectator at an animal fight, an addition to existing laws against operating the fights.

The letter cites a recent multi-state raid of a dog fighting operation that led to 367 dogs being rescued.

Animal fighting, and dog fighting in particular, has long been a matter of interest to the Senate. The late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., delivered a scathing floor speech against the practice responding to the case involving NFL quarterback Michael Vick.

The new letter appears below:

Dear Senate Conferees,

As you proceed to a House-Senate conference committee on the 2013 Farm Bill, to resolve differences between S.954 and H.R.2642, we write to call your attention to important animal fighting spectator prohibition provisions included in both bills.

The multi-state raid announced on August 26, 2013 in which the United States Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation rescued 367 dogs clearly demonstrates the need for stronger prohibitions on activities related to animal fighting. Federal and local officials also seized firearms, drugs, and more than $500,000 in cash from dog fighting gambling activities that took place over the course of the investigation.

When active animal fighting operations are raided, it is a common practice for the organizers, promoters, and animal owners to blend into the crowd in order to shield themselves from law enforcement. Though many states have enacted legislation to make attendance at an animal fight a criminal offense, local and state law enforcement still need a federal statute to appropriately prosecute these individuals and help end these criminal operations for good.

S.954 includes the language of the Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act, a bipartisan bill that the Senate approved twice in the 112th Congress. This bill currently has 24 cosponsors in the Senate and 205 cosponsors in the House of Representatives. The legislation also enjoys broad support from animal welfare groups and approximately 300 law enforcement organizations.

We urge you to ensure that the bipartisan language of the Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act, contained in Section 12209 of S.954, is adopted by the conference committee. This language would apply federal criminal penalties to any individual who knowingly attends or knowingly brings a minor to one of these horrific events. Since H.R.2642 already contains language to establish even stronger federal penalties for animal fighting spectators, the language in S.954 is a reasonable compromise and should be adopted.

Thank you for considering this request. We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,

Richard Blumenthal

United States Senate

Mark Kirk

United States Senate

Maria Cantwell

United States Senate

David Vitter

United States Senate

Mary L. Landrieu

United States Senate

Susan Collins

United States Senate

Tom Carper

United States Senate

Robert Menendez

United States Senate

Bernard Sanders

United States Senate

Mark Warner

United States Senate

Jeff Merkley

United States Senate

Kirsten E. Gillibrand

United States Senate

Chris Coons

United States Senate

Kelly Ayotte

United States Senate

Martin Heinrich

United States Senate

Edward J. Markey

United States Senate

Benjamin L. Cardin

United States Senate

 

Comments (4)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    9:29 a.m.

    I’ll immediately grab your rss feed as I can’t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  2. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    8:38 a.m.

    Hello! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the excellent work!

    http://lifestream.aol.com/stream/fmorenop40infoasistencia.com

  3. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    4:46 a.m.

    Thank you for every one of your effort on this site. My mum really loves carrying out research and it is easy to see why. Many of us know all about the powerful method you convey valuable steps on your web site and encourage response from the others about this theme while our girl is actually learning a lot of things. Enjoy the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one doing a really great job.

    http://www.mainhardt.com.br/wiki/index.php?title=Best_Low_Cost_Auto_Insurance_California

  4. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:02 a.m.

    A lot of of whatever you point out is astonishingly precise and that makes me ponder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. This particular article really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this particular issue goes. However there is one particular issue I am not really too comfy with and while I attempt to reconcile that with the main idea of your point, allow me see exactly what the rest of the subscribers have to point out.Very well done.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...