Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 8, 2015

Senators Seek More Information About Targeted Killings With Drones (Video)

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Two Senate Democrats want the public to know more about the rules behind the targeted killing of American citizens using drones.

“I believe every American has the right to know when their government believes it is allowed to kill them, and the public release of this memo is a positive step toward reducing the secrecy that surrounds this question,” Sen. Ron Wyden said in a statement. “However, there are many important questions that this memo does not address.”

Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon who serves on the Intelligence Committee, was responding to the disclosure of a redacted form of a controversial 2010 Justice Department memo authorizing a lethal drone strike against Anwar al-Awlaki. The memorandum from the Office of Legal Counsel was released under court order from the New York-based Second Circuit.

“It is my hope that making this memo public will generate new pressure for the executive branch to answer other pressing questions,” Wyden added. “For example, how much evidence does the president need to determine that a particular American is a legitimate target for military action? Or, can the president strike an American anywhere in the world? What does it mean to say that capturing an American must be ‘infeasible’? And exactly what other limits and boundaries apply to this authority?”

The release came about after the Obama administration agreed to accept the order for the memo to be made public as part of the negotiations that led to confirmation of David J. Barron to be a federal appeals court judge on the First Circuit.

Barron won confirmation in May, 53-45.

As an acting assistant attorney general, Barron authored the memo released Monday. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., backed Barron only after administration assurances about the memo.

In his own statement on Monday, Udall pointed to other questions that haven’t been answered about the drone policy.

“The federal appeals court’s release of the Justice Department’s legal justification for the targeted killing of Americans is a victory for government transparency and the type of strong, public oversight of intelligence agencies I have long championed,” Udall said. “But I also have called for — and not received — answers to questions such as how much evidence the government requires in order to make an American a legitimate target, how an ‘imminent’ threat is defined, and what are the geographical boundaries of these authorities, among others. I will continue to press for these answers and for more information to be made public on additional legal opinions regarding targeted killings.”

Comments (6)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. erick

    June 23, 2014
    8:44 p.m.

    If you criticize J. Edgar Hoover’s dress or don’t buy tickets to the police mans ball, then you may be targeted for a drone strike.

  2. erick

    June 24, 2014
    3:44 p.m.

    The NSA will find you and kill you.

  3. Hitched

    June 27, 2014
    5:01 p.m.

    Most scientists realize that we greatly depend upon the whims of genius and circumstance during the voyage toward scientific discovery.

  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    6:51 a.m.

    F*ckin¦ tremendous issues here. I am very satisfied to peer your post. Thanks so much and i am looking ahead to touch you. Will you please drop me a mail?

  5. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    3:57 p.m.

    Very interesting points you have remarked, thanks for posting. “I never said most of the things I said.” by Lawrence Peter Berra.

  6. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    10:33 p.m.

    I haven’t checked in here for some time because I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are great quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend :)

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...