Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
August 4, 2015

The First Post-‘Nuclear’ Cabinet Nominee? (Updated)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

Updated 4:08 p.m. | President Barack Obama could probably nominate anyone he wants to be the next Homeland Security secretary, assuming there are no ethical or legal issues.

That’s because Janet Napolitano’s successor at the Department of Homeland Security could be the first Cabinet choice to be nominated in a Senate without the risk of a filibuster — or maybe even a procedural hold, assuming Senate Democrats deploy the “nuclear option” to end the need for a 60-vote supermajority to overcome a filibuster of executive branch nominees next week.

There would be policy implications of a partisan choice, however. Some Republican supporters of the Senate-passed immigration overhaul are already cautioning the president to pick a successor who has the confidence of lawmakers in enhancing immigration enforcement.

“The Senate has done the right thing for our country by passing a comprehensive immigration law. However, that work will be worth nothing if the Administration — specifically the new Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security — fails to uphold their end of the bargain,” Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., said in a statement. “The new DHS Secretary must take bold steps immediately upon taking office to reassure the American people that this Administration will enforce any new comprehensive immigration reform plan that becomes law.”

Moreover, the news of Napolitano’s departure later this year to helm the University of California system comes as the House is working on a step-by-step approach to immigration legislation, and not long after an administration move to delay the employer mandate in the health care law.

“After the president’s decision to unilaterally delay the employer mandate in his health care law, there is a huge trust gap right now, and that could easily poison the well on immigration,” one senior GOP aide said. “How can we trust him to secure the border and enforce the law when he isn’t even following the law that’s named after him?”

“If Democrats actually do the nuclear option, it would reduce the confirmation process to one party rule. President Obama could install controversial nominees with a complicit Democrat majority and no real input from the opposition,” said John Ashbrook, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

“The selection of her replacement could be the first test of a scaled back check on the president’s power,” he added.

Immigration “gang of eight” member Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y.,  has already contacted White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough to recommend a “law and order” official for the DHS job: New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly.

“As a former head of the Customs and Border patrol, he has top-level federal management experience. There is no doubt Ray Kelly would be a great DHS Secretary, and I have urged the White House to very seriously consider his candidacy,” Schumer said in a statement. “While it would be New York’s loss, Commissioner Kelly’s appointment as the head of DHS would be a great boon for the entire country.”

Schumer previously touted Kelly for the FBI director post, according to the New York Daily News.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said it was too early to talk about a nominee for the DHS post.

“I think it is far too premature on the day that Secretary Napolitano announced that she’s leaving in a month and a half to speculate about successors,” Carney said. “The president will be very deliberate in examining his options.”

To say Napolitano’s been no favorite of conservatives would be an understatement. At times, she became the person through which Republicans such as Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama expressed opposition to Obama administration immigration policies, including deferred action for undocumented young people.

“Secretary Napolitano’s tenure at the Department of Homeland Security was defined by a consistent disrespect for the rule of law,” Sessions said in a statement. “The most significant obstacle to immigration reform remains President Obama’s selective enforcement of the law. Any selection — interim or permanent — to replace Secretary Napolitano must disavow these aggressive non-enforcement directives or there is very little hope for successful immigration reform.”

Matt Fuller contributed to this report.

Comments (31)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. bittman

    July 13, 2013
    9:29 a.m.

    Payback could really be Hell! With the disaster that Obamacare is turning out to be, Reid could lose his job after the 2014 election. Of course, that depends upon the FEC, IRS, DOJ, many other Federal agencies, and the Administration’s media being unsuccessful in their efforts to preserve the Democrat’s leadership.

    • Charles Wolf

      July 16, 2013
      11:25 p.m.

      Reid could lose his job after the 2014 election.
      Ummm, baloney…his term runs till 2016.
      Reid will go only if he retires, dies or gets impeached.

      OTOH, the turtle’s term (Mcconnell) is up in 2014 & he is getting a pretty good challenge considering its KY.

      • bittman

        July 17, 2013
        9:40 a.m.

        Reid’s term as Senator ends in 2016; OTOH unless the Democrats retain its Majority, Reid will no longer hold his position there.

  2. Goldenah

    July 13, 2013
    11:36 a.m.

    Would be a great time for Congress to restructure Homeland Security and the entire apparatus out of existence.

  3. iconoclast

    July 13, 2013
    3:53 p.m.

    So Obama can appoint another marginal apparatchik without objection by the GOP?

    Ok, go for it. The worst thing that can happen to this administration is to get their way. The inevitable outcome of that will be more scandal, incompetence, graft, abuse of power, and cronyism. Which will come out despite the efforts of the mainstream media.

    And, as we all know, what goes around comes around. The next GOP administration will have the same privileges as the Obama administration. I wonder how much Democrats will enjoy that?

    • Minicapt

      July 13, 2013
      9:20 p.m.

      Not a problem, because if the Dems lose the Senate in Nov 2014, they will have six sitting weeks in which to reintroduce the filibuster, before the the handover in Jan 2017. Because the political circumstances will have changed and the filibuster is again vital for the survival of the Republic. Just ask Harry.


  4. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    6:28 a.m.

    When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

  5. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    11:16 a.m.

    I don’t ordinarily comment but I gotta say appreciate it for the post on this one : D.

  6. Anonymous

    July 6, 2015
    7:28 p.m.

    Thanks , I’ve just been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?

  7. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    8:37 a.m.

    Absolutely composed subject matter, Really enjoyed looking through.

  8. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    5:45 p.m.

    Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Thanks

  9. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    11:37 p.m.

    Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch as I found it for him smile Thus let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

  10. Anonymous

    July 11, 2015
    9:10 a.m.

    Hiya, I’m really glad I have found this information. Today bloggers publish just about gossips and web and this is really irritating. A good website with interesting content, this is what I need. Thanks for keeping this site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  11. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    1:08 p.m.

    Great goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too fantastic. I actually like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it smart. I can not wait to read much more from you. This is really a great web site.

  12. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    3:26 p.m.

    I truly appreciate this post. I’ve been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thanks again!

  13. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    8:03 p.m.

    I was just searching for this information for a while. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, at last I got it in your site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this kind of informative websites in top of the list. Normally the top sites are full of garbage.

  14. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    8:55 p.m.

    Great write-up, I?¦m regular visitor of one?¦s blog, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  15. Anonymous

    July 14, 2015
    12:22 a.m.

    Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I get actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly.

  16. Anonymous

    July 14, 2015
    12:46 a.m.

    A person essentially help to make seriously posts I would state. This is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I surprised with the research you made to create this particular publish extraordinary. Fantastic job!

  17. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    6:29 a.m.

    Together with almost everything that appears to be developing within this particular subject matter, your perspectives are generally somewhat stimulating. On the other hand, I appologize, but I can not give credence to your whole strategy, all be it exciting none the less. It would seem to everybody that your comments are generally not totally rationalized and in fact you are your self not even fully convinced of your assertion. In any event I did enjoy reading it.

  18. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    6:58 a.m.

    You have brought up a very fantastic points, thankyou for the post.

  19. Anonymous

    July 18, 2015
    1:59 a.m.

    Hey very nice website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds also…I’m happy to find a lot of useful information here in the post, we need develop more strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  20. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    1:36 p.m.

    My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page again.

  21. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    6:41 p.m.

    F*ckin’ amazing things here. I’m very glad to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i am taking a look ahead to contact you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?

  22. Anonymous

    July 21, 2015
    4:28 a.m.

    I am not sure the place you’re getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend a while learning much more or figuring out more. Thanks for great information I used to be searching for this info for my mission.

  23. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    9:35 a.m.

    I just could not depart your site prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standard information a person provide for your visitors? Is gonna be back often to check up on new posts

  24. Anonymous

    July 24, 2015
    5:01 p.m.

    I have been exploring for a little bit for any high-quality articles or weblog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this site. Reading this info So i’m happy to exhibit that I have an incredibly good uncanny feeling I discovered just what I needed. I such a lot indubitably will make sure to do not put out of your mind this site and give it a glance on a continuing basis.

  25. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:31 a.m.

    It¦s actually a cool and useful piece of info. I¦m glad that you simply shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  26. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    5:02 p.m.

    Fantastic site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you in your sweat!

  27. Anonymous

    July 28, 2015
    1:51 p.m.

    I am really loving the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems? A number of my blog visitors have complained about my website not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera. Do you have any advice to help fix this problem?

  28. Anonymous

    Aug. 3, 2015
    12:52 p.m.

    Very interesting topic, regards for putting up. “Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm.” by George Ellis.

Sign In

Forgot password?



Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...