Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 28, 2015

What’s Really Behind the Boxer-Lautenberg Feud

Forget about the unseemliness of questioning a dead man’s ability to sign off on a piece of legislation. The real issue at hand in the dustup between Sen. Barbara Boxer and supporters of the late Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg’s chemical safety bill is Senate protocol.

As CQ Roll Call’s Meredith Shiner has been reporting all week, Boxer began an aggressive lobbying campaign against Lautenberg’s bipartisan bill in the days after his June 3 death; in doing so, the Environment and Public Works chairwoman raised the issue of whether the New Jersey Democrat knew what he was supporting when he crafted a deal with the panel’s ranking member, Republican David Vitter of Louisiana.

But the larger problem was articulated by Boxer herself when she angrily told Shiner that she had no clue Lautenberg was even working on a bipartisan proposal. “I have no idea about how this bill was written because I wasn’t involved and only knew about it when I read about it in the papers,” she said.

It’s hard to believe that Lautenberg, before his death, didn’t think to alert the chairwoman of his committee about a major rewrite of toxic chemical laws. He served in the Senate for almost 30 years; he was undoubtedly familiar with the standard protocol of letting higher-ranking members of your party know what you’re doing.

And even if Lautenberg was guilty of an oversight in this instance, his staff should have surely known it would be a problem when they unveiled the bill, which they did just two weeks before their boss died.

It’s possible, of course, that Lautenberg didn’t want Boxer to know because he feared interference from the chairwoman might upset the compromise with the conservative Vitter. Still, he and his staff should have anticipated her reaction when she found out.

Plus, as an expert on toxic chemical laws, Lautenberg and his staff must have known that the bill would present a serious problem for Boxer, given it would pre-empt strict chemical safety laws in her home state of California.

The reason Shiner’s stories are so compellling, however, is because Lautenberg is no longer around to defend himself against the accusations and because Boxer and her staff seem to have gone about opposing the measure in a way that appears insensitive to the late senator’s legacy.

The issue came to head Thursday, when Boxer convened a meeting of EPW Democrats and argued against the bill. During that meeting, she also accused Lautenberg’s supporters of not knowing what was in the bill. That, too, seems an unwise way of battling your opponents.

She has a compelling argument to make to Democrats on the merits of the bill, without impugning senators’ judgement. The majority of environmental groups oppose the bill. A dozen organizations sent a letter to Boxer, Vitter and their House counterparts on June 12 to lay out their concerns:

Some of our concerns with the bill include a weak safety standard, which on its face allows for “reasonable” injuries to public health from toxic chemicals. The bill contains no clear deadlines for EPA action on or assessment of chemicals, few safeguards for vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women, and no minimum testing requirements for old or new chemicals. We are also troubled that [the bill] does not seem to provide fast action on and special protections from persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals and does not protect workers or communities disproportionately affected by
chemical exposures.
Furthermore, the broad language on state-level preemption could tie California’s hands and prevent the state from continuing to be a leader on toxic chemical issues. … For these and other reasons, the Chemical Safety Improvement Act is not acceptable in its current form.
It seems that both sides could have used better judgment in crafting the bill and opposing it.

Comments (19)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. BJ

    June 21, 2013
    2:43 p.m.

    The real issue is that the bill is branded wrong, it is the Vitter Bill, not a “Lautenberg Bill” and the bill is an attempt to improve chemical safety. Some of the proposed measures are a step forward, but the bill does not fix the problem. The problem being chemical safety is still subsidized by tax payers via the EPA, and the industry who produces the chemicals, and suggest a “trust us” approach. The industry does not provide proof that the chemicals they produce are safe.
    So later, when we (CDC, EPA, or universities and research institutions) find that a chemical is toxic and harmful, we have to play “policy catch-up” to ban toxic chemicals and pesticides that are linked to cancer, reproductive harm and other disease.
    Lautenberg was a champion, and this bill is not that, its a Vitter Bill. Vitter is asking, on behalf of the chemical industry for tax payers to subsidize the chemical industry, and role back efforts in States that are holding the chemical industry more accountable.

    Everyone is getting caught up in branding of “bi-partisan” or using Lautenburg’s to sign on. Read the details, it should be called the Vitter Bill.
    This article suggests Boxer is upset about protocol, when actually she read the bill, the Vitter Bill.

  2. Charles Wolf

    June 22, 2013
    1:19 p.m.

    If the fed wants to set minimum national standards, that is a good idea.
    The plan to preempt stricter state standards is a corporate giveaway and will serve only to shorten our lifespans. I do not want hillbilly legislators from a bunch of bought off states (WV comes to mind) telling real states like NY or CA how to govern themselves.

  3. Anonymous

    July 4, 2015
    5:44 p.m.

    Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues. When I look at your website in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, fantastic blog!

    http://www.furtdsolinopv.com/

  4. Anonymous

    July 6, 2015
    5:32 p.m.

    Thank you, I’ve just been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours is the best I have found out so far. However, what about the conclusion? Are you positive in regards to the supply?

    http://topcheapinsurance.com/homeowners-insurance.html

  5. Anonymous

    July 7, 2015
    4:04 p.m.

    I am delighted that I discovered this blog, precisely the right information that I was searching for! .

  6. Anonymous

    July 8, 2015
    midnight

    Hello! I just would like to give a huge thumbs up for the great info you have here on this post. I will be coming back to your blog for more soon.

    http://raisingchildren.net.au/forum/UserInfo93255.aspx

  7. Anonymous

    July 9, 2015
    5:54 a.m.

    I have been browsing online more than three hours as of late, but I never discovered any fascinating article like yours. It’s lovely value enough for me. In my view, if all webmasters and bloggers made just right content as you did, the net will probably be a lot more helpful than ever before. “Dignity is not negotiable. Dignity is the honor of the family.” by Vartan Gregorian.

    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Profile/Infoasistencia

  8. Anonymous

    July 11, 2015
    10:23 a.m.

    Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage? My blog site is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would definitely benefit from a lot of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this okay with you. Cheers!

    https://www.scribd.com/haskell6borg

  9. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    12:47 p.m.

    hi!,I like your writing very much! share we communicate more about your article on AOL? I need a specialist on this area to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

    http://homeownersinsurancem.com/amica-car-and-home-insurance.html

  10. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    5:36 p.m.

    I have been reading out many of your articles and i can claim pretty nice stuff. I will make sure to bookmark your site.

    http://www.wat.tv/video/salon-massage-naturiste-massage-79q5z_79q5x_.html

  11. Anonymous

    July 13, 2015
    10:32 p.m.

    I want assembling utile info, this post has got me even more info! .

    http://vimeo.com/126527913

  12. Anonymous

    July 17, 2015
    5:19 a.m.

    It’s actually a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

    http://www.sharemaza.com/index.php/blogs/28281/304219/florida-car-insurance-rates-by-z

  13. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    3:06 p.m.

    Wow! This could be one particular of the most useful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Excellent. I am also an expert in this topic therefore I can understand your effort.

    http://brookereviews.com/product/stdcheck-com-review/

  14. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    6:41 p.m.

    Hi there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

    http://quotesautoinsurance.org/auto-insurance-quotes-nationwide.html

  15. Anonymous

    July 20, 2015
    11:46 p.m.

    I really prize your work, Great post.

    http://lowcostautoquotes.com/lowest-auto-insurance.html

  16. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    6:31 a.m.

    I truly wanted to type a remark to be able to thank you for all the fantastic items you are showing here. My extended internet look up has now been compensated with sensible knowledge to exchange with my visitors. I ‘d suppose that most of us visitors actually are unquestionably fortunate to dwell in a great network with very many marvellous individuals with useful tips and hints. I feel quite privileged to have come across your web pages and look forward to so many more pleasurable moments reading here. Thank you again for everything.

    http://bathmatehydromax-x30.weebly.com/blog/5-tips-untuk-besarkan-kemaluan

  17. Anonymous

    July 25, 2015
    4:27 p.m.

    I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You are wonderful! Thanks!

    https://www.zotero.org/bat59word

  18. Anonymous

    today
    5:03 a.m.

    I?¦m no longer positive where you are getting your info, however good topic. I must spend a while studying more or working out more. Thank you for fantastic info I used to be searching for this information for my mission.

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  19. Anonymous

    today
    3:37 p.m.

    Good day! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

    http://www.warriorforum.com/showthread.php?t=1094532

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...