Roll Call: Latest News on Capitol Hill, Congress, Politics and Elections
July 3, 2015

What Happens in the Senate When No One’s Looking? A Lot

(Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

While all eyes were on the House, the Senate actually got some work done. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call File Photo)

While everyone was focused on events in the House, the Senate had a sudden burst of productivity this week.

On Wednesday the chamber swiftly approved a Veterans Administration bill and quietly cleared an intelligence authorization by voice vote without any fanfare.

The Senate action came as the spotlight was on the House where the fallout of Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s Republican primary loss the night before was rippling through the chamber.

Action on the VA bill — passed so fast the CBO hasn’t finished analyzing it — had been spurred by the long wait times for medical attention across the country at VA facilities.

Sen. Bernard Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., quickly negotiated the measure, which would allow veterans to seek medical attention from private providers rather than suffer unreasonably long wait times. The bill also provided funds for hiring new doctors and authorized the leasing on new facilities. The measure will be reconciled with a House-passed bill.

McCain said the rapid response was spurred by the emergency situation that exists at the agency.

“It shows I think the impact of this terrible situation at the VA,” McCain said.

But it also showed that veterans’ issues could still have a unifying effect despite the currently hyper-partisan atmosphere in Congress.

The bill passed 93-3 with Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.; Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; and Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., opposing the bill over its potential costs, which the CBO estimated could cost a stunning $50 billion a year.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., who will likely be named as a member of the conference committee, pledged to find offsets for the bill.

However, Coburn didn’t think the bipartisanship on the veterans issue would lead to further passage of legislation.

“If we had the same … intensity about our budget, our deficits and our debt, we’d do something on them too,” Coburn said. “But the fact is that this is so out-of-the-park” bad at the VA.

Conservative firebrand Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, also warned not to read too much into the bipartisanship and blamed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., for the poor prospects of further legislative activity.

“Unfortunately not,” said Cruz when asked if the prospects have improved for other bills. “Harry Reid has made clear his intention to do nothing of consequence in the Senate this year.”

The Senate will this week continue to test its tolerance for bipartisanship in an election year by taking up a package of three appropriations bills including the Commerce-Justice-Science, Transportation-HUD and Agriculture bills.

The issue of amendments will be the most difficult hurdle. Reid has been reluctant to allow many amendments to be offered charging that Republicans are only interested in scoring political points rather than legislating.

Republicans argue that Reid also uses the Senate to make political points, including with a student loan bill, which Republicans blocked, in part, over the fact that the proposal was offset by a new minimum tax on millionaires. Republicans also argue that Reid’s lockdown on amendments limits their ability to represent their constituents, which gives the GOP no incentive to help move legislation through the chamber.

The standoff has killed many bills this Congress, even bipartisan legislation, including an energy efficiency package and a spate of about 50 expired tax breaks.

But Appropriations Committee Chairman Barbara A. Mikulski, D-Md., said she hopes an agreement can be worked out where relevant amendments can be offered.

“There will be amendments on the floor,” Mikulski said, adding that Reid is sorting out the process with Republicans.

“First of all, what we want is amendments germane to the bill, so the bills that we’re moving next week are not foreign policy bills, they’re bread-and-butter bills,” Mikulski said. “Amendments will be allowed. We want relevant amendments to the bill.”

Coburn, a fiscal hawk who has thwarted the appropriations process in the past, said Mikulski has reached out to him to try to smooth the process.

“I’ve taken a little bit of a different approach,” Coburn said. “I have worked with Barbara; I am going to try to help her pass bills.

However, Coburn said he has issues with the C-J-S bill, which uses “changes in mandatory spending programs” also known as “chimps,” which he claims are used to falsely claim savings.

“But on the bills that have chimps in them, I am going to oppose them,” Coburn.

He pointed to the chimp used in connection with the Crime Victims Fund in the measure. The fund is supposed to collect fines and penalties imposed on criminals to help pay for the needs of crime victims such as lost wages, funerals, and health care costs.

The fund typically has a higher balance that is spent in the year for victim aid and counts the rest as savings.

“I think it’s morally reprehensible that you would steal money year after year that is not there, its nonexistent, and say because we didn’t give victims of crime their money, and we are not going to spend it, therefore it’s a savings,” Coburn said.

Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., who is also chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, said he was cautiously optimistic that the package could get through the chamber.

“It’s been so long since we tried to get up on this bicycle, I don’t know if we can keep it moving; I think we can,” Durbin said.

Niels Lesniewski and Tamar Hallerman contributed to this report.

Comments (12)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

author email

  1. Jazzy

    June 13, 2014
    7:27 p.m.

    Humberto, next time you see Boehner tell him 3 million Americans are still waiting for RENEWUI w/ retro

    • kekemom

      June 14, 2014
      6:17 p.m.

      Maybe they should get jobs.There are actually plenty out there.

  2. Denise_in_georgia

    June 14, 2014
    7:19 a.m.

    Once again it is only republicans voting against taking care of the vets – they made tens of thousands of new vets who need services and refuse to pay for taking care of them.

    I wonder how many republicans will vote against the vets needs in the House?

  3. kekemom

    June 14, 2014
    6:16 p.m.

    It is about time. Harry Reid has blocked all kinds of legislation for years.

  4. Amanda Nevada

    June 15, 2014
    9:25 a.m.

    To justify and wield arbitrary power, those who preach from collectivism’s altar often attempt to hijack democracy’s ideal by claiming that majority rule is absolute.

  5. Arthur Istook

    June 15, 2014
    9:33 p.m.

    Since we have no way to know what gadgets and gizmos will be most useful in the future, we should recognize that the best way to prepare for the unknown is to maintain the most liberty, and therefore the most flexibility, to adapt.

  6. derek

    June 16, 2014
    1:50 a.m.

    Who doesn’t need an extra income? Do it from the comfort of your own home. Sounds good? NO BS! Google onlineautoincome.

  7. Liberalism is Nonsense

    June 18, 2014
    9:04 a.m.

    The most ardent advocates of democratic majorities’ unlimited power also tend to be the very administrators who know that once authority is assumed in the name of the majority, it will be they who command it.

  8. Wise words ...

    June 19, 2014
    12:54 a.m.

    Those who harbor utopian delusions work very hard to undermine the institutions and traditions, such as private property, upon which civilization depends.

  9. Fiji's Best

    June 19, 2014
    2:55 a.m.

    The knowledge unleashed through citizens’ liberty is far superior to that which could ever be available to centralized state administrators.

  10. Anonymous

    June 27, 2015
    4:30 a.m.

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

    http://www.sdorttuiiplmnr.com/

  11. Anonymous

    July 2, 2015
    2:54 p.m.

    Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

    http://terbaik4u.weebly.com/

Sign In

Forgot password?

Or

Subscribe

Receive daily coverage of the people, politics and personality of Capitol Hill.

Subscription | Free Trial

Logging you in. One moment, please...